1 |
Barone, S. and Lombardo, A. (2004). Service quality design through a smart use of conjoint analysis, The Asian Journal of Quality, 5, 34-42.
DOI
|
2 |
Berkson, J. (1955). Maximum likelihood and minimum chi-square estimates of the logistic function, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 130-162.
|
3 |
Berkson, J. (1980). Minimum chi-square, not maximum likelihood, The Annals of Statistics, 8, 457-487.
DOI
|
4 |
Chakraborty, G., Ball, D., Gaeth, G. J. and Jun, S. (2002). The ability of rating and choice conjoint to predict market shares: A Monte Carlo simulation, Journal of Business Research, 55, 237-249.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Desarbo, W. S., Ramaswamy, V. and Cohen, S. H. (1995). Market segmentation with choice-based conjoint analysis, Marketing Letters, 6, 137-147.
DOI
|
6 |
Elrod, T., Louviere, J. J. and Davey, K. S. (1992). An empirical comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint models, Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 368-377.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Giancristofaro, R. A. (2003). A new conjoint analysis procedure with application to marketing research, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 32, 2271-2283.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Green, P. E., Carroll, D. and Goldberg, S. M. (1981). A general approach to product design optimization via conjoint analysis, Journal of Marketing, 45, 17-37.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Green, P. E. and Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice, Journal of Marketing, 54, 3-19.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Haaijer, R., Kamakura, W. and Wedel, M. (2001). The no-choice alternative in conjoint choice experiments, International Journal of Market Research, 43, 93-106.
|
11 |
ohnson, R. M. and Orme, B. K. (1996). How many questions should you ask in choice-based conjoint studies?, Research Paper Series, Sawtooth Software, Inc.
|
12 |
Kamakura, W. A. (1988). A least squares procedure for benefit segmentation with conjoint experiments, Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 157-167.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Kim, B. Y. (2005). Conjoint analysis for the development of new cellular phone, Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 33, 103-110.
|
14 |
Kuhfeld, W. F. and Tobias, R. D. (2005). Large factorial designs for product engineering and marketing research applications, Technometrics, 47, 132-141.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Kuhfeld, W. F., Tobias, R. D. and Garratt, M. (1994). Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications, Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 545-557.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J. and Li, W. (2005). Applied Linear Statistical Models, McGraw Hill.
|
17 |
Lazari, A. G. and Anderson, D. A. (1994). Designs of discrete choice set experiments for estimating both attribute and availability cross effects, Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 375-383.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Lim, B., Ahn, K. and Park, U. (2006). A study on the comparison of the predictability among traditional and choice-based conjoint analysis in the choice of service products, Journal of Global Scholars Marketing Science, 16, 37-52.
|
19 |
Marshall, P. and Bradlow, E. T. (2002). A unified approach to conjoint analysis models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 674-682.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Moore, W. L. (2004). A cross-validity comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 299-312.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Orme, B. (2010). Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research, Madison, Research Publishers LLC, Wisconsin.
|
22 |
Shin, Y. J., Kim, B. Y. and Hyun, Y. J. (2007). Conjoint analysis for the effects of cigarette warning label and packaging on intention to quit, Journal of Health and Social Affairs, 27, 27-51.
|