Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2005.18.2.487

A Suggestion on Instruction Service Quality Assessment Tool  

Choi Kyoung-Ho (Department of Public Opinion Poll, Jeonju University)
Lee Seung-Joo (Division of Life Science-Genetic Engineering Statistics, Cheongju University)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics / v.18, no.2, 2005 , pp. 487-497 More about this Journal
Abstract
The instruction assessment, which can be a tool to realize a class of high quality, evaluates instruction system and process. The result data of the instruction assessment is analysed and used to reorganize lecture contents or to improve teaching method. It enhances qualitative level of university education. The goal of the instruction assessment is to be a tool that provides high qualitative education to raise students' satisfaction. It is important to improve education service quality through instruction assessment as a useful tool for measuring service quality. The suggestion of valid tool for improving instruction service quality is described in this paper.
Keywords
Service quality; Service quality index; Instruction evaluation; Validity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 차수련, 채연수 (1999). 교육 서버스품질의 측정에 관한 연구, <경상논총>, 20, 81-110
2 유춘호 . 이정호 (2003). 대학의 강의평가에 영향을 미치는 학생관련 요인에 관한 연구, <경영학연구>, 32, 789-807
3 이유재 (2004). 서비스마케팅(제 3판), 학현사, 서울
4 조선배 (2000). 서비스품질을 어떻게 바라볼 것인가?, <품질경영웹진>, 133-137
5 Berry, L. L., A. Parasuraman and V. A. Zeithaml(1988). The service quality puzzle, Business Horizon, September-October, 31, 35-43   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Buzzell, R. D. and B. T. Gale(1987). The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance, New York, Free Press
7 Cohen, P. A.(1980). Effectiveness of student rating feedback for improving college instruction : a meta-analysis of findings, Research in Higher Education, 13, 321-341   DOI
8 Gale, T. B.(1992). Monitoring Customer Satisfaction and Marketing-Perceived Quality, Chicago, AMA
9 Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml and L. L. Berry(1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research, Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-50
10 Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml and L. L. Berry(1988). SERVQUAL : A multi-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality, Journal of Retailing, 64, 2-40
11 신용식 (1999). 품질기능전개를 이용한 대학 강의서비스 품질평가 모형 설계, 아주대학교 산업대학원 석사학위논문
12 유춘호 (2001). 강의 평가 설문문항의 개 발에 관한 연구, <경영연구>, 26, 339-389
13 Zeithaml, V. A., L. L. Berry and A. Parasuraman(1996), The behavioral consequences of service quality, Journal of Marketing, 60, 31-46
14 김명화 (2002). 강의명가 자료분석을 통한 강의 평가지 개선방안, <교육문제연구>, 16, 81-101
15 김수선 (2001). 대학강의평가 구성요소에 대한 이론적 고찰 및 강의평가 도구의 양호도에 대한 실증적 분석, 성균관대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
16 김종태 . 이재만 (2004). A study on reliability of lecture evaluation by students, Journal of Korean Data & Information Science Society, 15, 183-191
17 김혜연 (2003). 강의평가와 관련된 요인들의 관련성에 관한 연구, 단국대학교 대학원 석사학위논문