Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.29220/CSAM.2022.29.4.487

Monitoring social networks based on transformation into categorical data  

Lee, Joo Weon (Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University)
Lee, Jaeheon (Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University)
Publication Information
Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods / v.29, no.4, 2022 , pp. 487-498 More about this Journal
Abstract
Social network analysis (SNA) techniques have recently been developed to monitor and detect abnormal behaviors in social networks. As a useful tool for process monitoring, control charts are also useful for network monitoring. In this paper, the degree and closeness centrality measures, in which each has global and local perspectives, respectively, are applied to an exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) chart and a multinomial cumulative sum (CUSUM) chart for monitoring undirected weighted networks. In general, EWMA charts monitor only one variable in a single chart, whereas multinomial CUSUM charts can monitor a categorical variable, in which several variables are transformed through classification rules, in a single chart. To monitor both degree centrality and closeness centrality simultaneously, we categorize them based on the average of each measure and then apply to the multinomial CUSUM chart. In this case, the global and local attributes of the network can be monitored simultaneously with a single chart. We also evaluate the performance of the proposed procedure through a simulation study.
Keywords
average run length; closeness centrality; degree centrality; exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) chart; multinomial cumulative sum (CUSUM) chart; social network monitoring;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Perry MB (2020). An EWMA control chart for categorical processes with applications to social network monitoring, Journal of Quality Technology, 52, 182-197.   DOI
2 Abbasi A and Hossain L (2013). Hybrid centrality measures for binary and weighted networks, Complex Networks, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
3 Dijkstra EW (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs, Numerische Mathematik, 269-271.
4 Scott J (1991). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, Sage Publications, Inc.
5 Hosseini SS and Noorossana R (2018). Performance evaluation of EWMA and CUSUM control charts to detect anomalies in social networks using average and standard deviation of degree measures, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 34, 477-500.   DOI
6 Opsahl T, Agneessens F, and Skvoretz J (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths, Social Networks, 32, 245-251.   DOI
7 Reynolds MR Jr and Stoumbos ZG (1999). A CUSUM chart for monitoring a proportion when inspecting continuously, Journal of Quality Technology, 31, 87-108.   DOI
8 Yu L, Zwetsloot IM, Stevens NT, Wilson JD, and Tsui KL (2021). Monitoring dynamic networks: A simulation-based strategy for comparing monitoring methods and a comparative study, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 39, 1226-1250.
9 Brandes U (2001). A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality, The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25, 163-177.   DOI
10 Barrat A, Barthelemy M, Pastor-Satorras R, and Vespignani A (2004). The architecture of complex weighted networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 3747-3752.   DOI
11 Freeman LC (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness, Sociometry, 40, 35-41.   DOI
12 Freeman LC (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification, Social Networks, 1, 215-239.   DOI
13 Abbasi A, Altmann J, and Hossain L (2011). Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars, Journal of Informetrics, 5, 594-607.   DOI
14 Knoth S (2021). R software package 'spc': Statistical process control- Calculation of ARL and other control chart performance measures.
15 Priebe CE, Conroy JM, Marchette DJ, and Park Y (2005). Scan statistics on Enron graphs, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 11, 229-247.   DOI
16 Roberts SW (1959). Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages,Technometrics, 1, 239-250.   DOI
17 Newman MEJ (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality, Physical Review E, 64, 016132.
18 Ryan AG, Wells LJ, and Woodall WH (2011). Methods for monitoring multiple proportions when inspecting continuously, Journal of Quality Technology, 43, 237-248.   DOI
19 Yu L, Woodall WH, and Tsui KL (2018). Detecting node propensity changes in the dynamic degree corrected stochastic block model, Social Networks, 54, 209-227.   DOI
20 Wilson JD, Stevens NT, and Woodall WH (2019). Modeling and detecting change in temporal networks via a dynamic degree corrected stochastic block model, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 35, 1363-1378.   DOI