Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5351/CKSS.2012.19.4.571

Software Taskset Processing Evaluation Based on a Mixed Debugging Process  

Kim, U-Jung (College of General Education, Hallym University)
Lee, Chong-Hyung (Department of Hospital Management, Konyang University)
Publication Information
Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods / v.19, no.4, 2012 , pp. 571-577 More about this Journal
Abstract
Modules that consist of software are respectively coded in the early development phase and the modules are unified as a software. After unification, the software is repeatedly tested with a given taskset (the set of module tasks that are tested simultaneously) until a required performance level is satisfied. In this paper, we expand the one-module software debugging model of Jang and Lee (2011) to a multi-module debugging model and derive the taskset completion probability and the mean of the completed tasksets under the assumption that the processing times of module tasks given in a taskset are mutually dependent.
Keywords
Multi-module software; mixed debugging; taskset completion probability;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Tokuno, K. and Yamada, S. (2006). Stochastic performance evaluation for multi-tasking processing system with software availability model, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 12, 412-424.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Barlow, R. E. and Proschan, F. (1981). Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing: Reliability Models, Silver Spring, Maryland.
3 Jang, K. B. and Lee, C. H. (2011). A software performance evaluation model with mixed Debugging process, Communications of the Korean Statistical Society, 18, 741-750.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Kim, U. J. and Lee, C. H. (2010). Evaluation of software task processing based on Markovian imperfect debugging model and its release policy, Communications of the Korean Statistical Society, 17, 891-898.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Laprie, J. C. and Kanoun, K. (1992). X-ware reliability and availability modeling, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18, 130-147.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Lee, C. H., Kim, Y.-H. and Park, D. H. (2011). Evaluation of multi-tasking software system performance with consideration of module dependency, Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practices, 23, 361-374.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Lee, C. H., Nam, K. H. and Park, D. H. (2001). Optimal software release policy based on Markovian perfect debugging model, Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 30, 2329-2342.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A. and Boes, D. C. (1974). Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, McGraw-Hill.
9 Moranda, P. B. (1979). Event-altered rate models for general reliability analysis, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-28(5), 376-381.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Shooman, M. L. and Trivedi, A. K. (1976). A many-state Markov model for computer software performance parameters, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-25, 66-68.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Tokuno, K. and Yamada, S. (2004). Performance evaluation for multi-task processing system with software availability model, Proceedings of the 2004 Asian International Workshop(AIWARM 2004), 539-546.