1 |
Redner, R. (1981). Note on the consistency of the maximum likelihood estimate for nonidentifiable distributions, Annals of Statistics, 9, 225-228.
DOI
|
2 |
Roeder, K. and Wasserman, L. (1997). Practical Bayesian density estimation using mixtures of normals, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 894-902.
DOI
|
3 |
Solka, J. L., Poston, W. L. and Wegman, E. J. (1995). A visualization technique for studying the iterative estimation of mixture densities, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 4, 180-198.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Titterington, D. M., Smith, A. F. M. and Makov, U. E. (1985). Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distributions, Wiley.
|
5 |
Wald, A. (1949). Note on the consistency of the maximum likelihood estimate, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 20, 595-601.
DOI
|
6 |
Alexandridis, R., Lin, S. and Irwin, M. (2004). Class discovery and classification of tumor samples using mixture modeling of gene expression data-A unified approach, Biominfomatics, 20, 2545-2552.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Chen, K. and Tan, X. (2009). Inference for multivariate normal mixtures, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100, 1367-1383.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Ciuperca, G., Ridolfi, A. and Idier, J. (2003). Penalized maximum likelihood estimator for normal Mixtures, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 30, 45-59.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M. and Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, Journal of Royal Statistical Society(B), 39, 1-38.
|
10 |
Hathaway, R. J. (1985). A constrained formulation of maximum likelihood estimation for normal mixture distributions, Annals of Statistics, 13, 795-800.
DOI
|
11 |
Ingrassia, S. (2004). A likelihood-based constrained algorithm for multivariate normal mixture models, Statistical Methods & Applications, 13, 151-166.
|
12 |
Raftery, A. E. and Dean, N. (1998). Variable selection for model-based clustering, Journal of American Statistical Association, 101, 168-178.
|
13 |
Priebe, C. E. (1994). Adaptive mixtures, Journal of American Statistical Association, 89, 796-806.
DOI
|