Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5351/CKSS.2011.18.3.287

The Method of Improvement in Fairness on Peer Assessment - Based on Convenience Analysis  

Choi, Kyoung-Ho (Department of Basic Medical Science, Jeonju University)
Publication Information
Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods / v.18, no.3, 2011 , pp. 287-294 More about this Journal
Abstract
Peer assessment is an educational valuation system that involves studying with a colleague and granting value to the progress made by the colleague. Although this method has many merits, there is also a drawback pertaining to calculating the mean of the scores that were granted to the levels of contribution. However, this has been improved upon by a diversified study. However, the concept of the chi-square test and p-value used in the preceding study is not easy individuals engaged in the industrial engineering field or education when using peer assessment. This study uses simple statistics like standard deviation, in addition to, investigating the availability of a suggested method as well as examples of utility and application. This study can contribute to increase the convenience of users through the use of convenience analysis and with this method.
Keywords
Convenience analysis; standard deviation; peer assessment; chi-square test; p-value;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 강정은 (2010). <동료평가를 이용한 개인 기여도 평가에 관한 연구>, 건국대학교대학원 석사학위논문.
2 고성석, 조미연 (2010). <통계적 기법을 이용한 효율적 동료 평가법>, 2010년 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 춘계공동학술대회.
3 김달호, 이경은, 손중권, 송재기, 박병구 (2008). <생활속의 통계>, 자유아카데미.
4 김민정 (2008). 웹기반 형성적 동료평가 시스템 개발을 위한 설계기반 연구, The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 14, 85-114.
5 박성현, 박영현 (1995). <통계적 품질관리>, 민영사.
6 이경미 (2010). <쓰기과업에서 동료평가가 자기평가에 미치는 영향>, 중앙대학교 교육대학원, 석사학위논문.
7 Green, M. (1994). Children as evaluators: Understanding evaluation from the inside, In Responsive Evaluation, Brain Cambourne and Jan Tubil(eds.), Portmouth, NH: Heinemann, 83-103.
8 Herbet, N. (2006). Peer assessment: Is it fair?, In Uniserve science assessment symposium proceeding, Sydney.
9 Kennedy, G. J. (2005). Peer-assessment in group projects: Is it worth it?, Australian Computer Society, 42, 59-65.
10 Parsons, D. (2004). Justice in the Classroom: Peer Assessment of Contributions in Group Projects, Proceedings of the 17th NACCQ, 145-151.