Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5351/CKSS.2011.18.1.047

Doubly Robust Imputation Using Auxiliary Information  

Park, Hyeon-Ah (Department of Statistics, Seoul National University)
Jeon, Jong-Woo (Department of Statistics, Seoul National University)
Na, Seong-Ryong (Department of Information and Statistics, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods / v.18, no.1, 2011 , pp. 47-55 More about this Journal
Abstract
Ratio and regression imputations depend on the model of a survey variable and the relation between the survey variable and auxiliary variables. If the model is not true, the unbiasedness of the estimator using the ratio or regression imputation cannot be guaranteed. In this paper, we develop the doubly robust imputation, which satisfies the approximate unbiasedness of the estimator, whether the model assumption is valid or not. The proposed imputation increases the efficiency of estimation by using the population information of the auxiliary variables. The simulation study establishes the theoretical results of this paper.
Keywords
Imputation; doubly robust; ratio imputation; auxiliary variable;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Rao, J. N. K. and Sitter, R. R. (1995). Variance estimation under two-phase sampling with application to imputation for missing data, Biometrika, 82, 453-460.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Robins, J. M., Rotnitzky, A. and Zhao, L. P. (1994). Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 846-66.   DOI
3 Rosenbaum, P. R. (1987). Model-based direct adjustment, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 387-394.   DOI
4 Cao, W., Tsiatis, A. A. and Davidian, M. (2009). Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data, Biometrika, 96, 723-734.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Carpenter, J. R. and Kenward, M. G. (2006). A comparison of multiple imputation and doubly robust estimation for analyses with missing data, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A), 169, 571-584.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Fay, R. E. (1991). A design-based perspective on missing data variance, The ASA Proceedings of Bureau of the Census Annual Research Conference, US Bureau of the Census, Washington, D. C., 429-440.
7 Groves, R., Dillman, D., Eltinge, J. and Little, R. J. A. (2002). Survey Nonresponse, Wiley, New York.
8 Isaki, C. T. and Fuller, W. A. (1982). Survey design under the regression superpopulation model, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 89-96.   DOI
9 Kim, J. K. and Park, H. (2006). Imputation using response probability, Canadian Journal of Statistics, 34, 171-182.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Kalton, G. (1983). Compensating for Missing Survey Data, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
11 Qin, J., Shao, J. and Zhang, B. (2008). Efficient and doubly robust imputation for covariate-dependent missing responses, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 797-810.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Rao, J. N. K. (1996). On variance estimation with imputed survey data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 499-506.   DOI