Browse > Article

AN INTEGRATED PROCESS CONTROL PROCEDURE WITH REPEATED ADJUSTMENTS AND EWMA MONITORING UNDER AN IMA(1,1) DISTURBANCE WITH A STEP SHIFT  

Park, Chang-Soon (Department of Statistics, Chung-Ang University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Statistical Society / v.33, no.4, 2004 , pp. 381-399 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statistical process control (SPC) and engineering process control (EPC) are based on different strategies for process quality improvement. SPC re-duces process variability by detecting and eliminating special causes of process variation, while EPC reduces process variability by adjusting compensatory variables to keep the quality variable close to target. Recently there has been need for an integrated process control (IPC) procedure which combines the two strategies. This paper considers a scheme that simultaneously applies SPC and EPC techniques to reduce the variation of a process. The process model under consideration is an IMA(1,1) model with a step shift. The EPC part of the scheme adjusts the process, while the SPC part of the scheme detects the occurrence of a special cause. For adjusting the process repeated adjustment is applied according to the predicted deviation from target. For detecting special causes the exponentially weighted moving average control chart is applied to the observed deviations. It was assumed that the adjustment under the presence of a special cause may increase the process variability or change the system gain. Reasonable choices of parameters for the IPC procedure are considered in the context of the mean squared deviation as well as the average run length.
Keywords
SPC; EPC; IMA(1,1); EWMA; observed deviation; predicted deviation; system gain; mean squared deviation; average run length;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Box, G. E. P. AND LUCE$\~{N}$O, A. (1997). Statistical Control by Monitoring and Feedback Adjustment, John Wiley & Sons, New York
2 JANAKIRAM, M. AND KEATS, J. B. (1998). 'Combining SPC and EPC in a hybrid industry', Journal of Quality Technology, 30, 189-200
3 MACGREGOR, J. F. (1987). 'Interfaces between process control and on-line statistical process control', Computing and Systems Technology Division Communications, 10, 9-20
4 MONTGOMERY, D. C. (1999). 'A perspective on models and the quality sciences: Some challenges and future directions', ASQ Statistics Division Newsletter, 18, 8-13
5 RUHHAL, N. H., RUNGER, G. C. AND DUMITRESCU, M. (2000). 'Control charts and feedback adjustments for a jump disturbance model', Journal of Quality Technology, 32, 379-394
6 Box, G. E. P., COLEMAN, D. E. AND BAXLEY, R. V. JR. (1997). 'A comparison of statistical process control and engineering process control', Journal of Quality Technology, 29, 128-130
7 Box, G. E. P. AND LUCE$\~{N}$O, A. (1994). 'Selection of sampling interval and action limit for discrete feedback adjustment', Technometrics, 36, 369-378   DOI   ScienceOn
8 VANDER WIEL, S. A., TUCKER, W. T., FALTIN, F. W. AND DOGANAKSOY, N. (1992). 'Algorithmic statistical process control: Concepts and an application', Technometrics, 34, 286-297   DOI   ScienceOn
9 NEMBHARD, H. B. AND MASTRANGELO, C. M. (1998). 'Integrated process control for startup operations', Journal of Quality Technology, 30, 201-211
10 Box, G. E. P. AND KRAMER, T. (1992). 'Statistical process monitoring and feedback adjustment-A discussion', Technometrics, 34, 251-267   DOI   ScienceOn
11 MONTGOMERY, D. C., KEATS, J. B., RUNGER, G. C. AND MESSINA, W. S. (1994). 'Integrating statistical process control and engineering process control', Journal of Quality Technology, 26, 79-87
12 VANDER WIEL, S. A. (1996). 'Monitoring processes that wander using integrated moving average models', Technometrics, 38, 139-151   DOI   ScienceOn
13 MASTRANGELO, C. M. AND BROWN, E. C. (2000). 'Shift detection properties of moving centerline control chart schemes', Journal of Quality Technology, 32, 67-74