Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.23895/kdijep.2022.44.1.1

Political Economy of Immigration and Fiscal Sustainability  

HUR, JINWOOK (Korea Development Institute)
Publication Information
KDI Journal of Economic Policy / v.44, no.1, 2022 , pp. 1-47 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper introduces a politico-economic model with a welfare state and immigration. In this model, policies on taxes and immigration are determined through a plurality voting system. While many studies of fiscal implications of immigration argue that relaxing immigration policies can substitute for tax reforms in an aging economy, I show that the democratic voting procedure can dampen the effect of relaxing immigration policies as desired policy reforms are not always implemented by the winner of an election. This political economy results in three types of social welfare losses. First, the skill composition is not balanced at a socially efficient level because workers are motivated to maximize their wages. Second, older retirees implement excessive taxes to maximize the size of the welfare state. Third, the volume of immigration is lower than the optimal level given the incentive by young workers to regain political power in the future.
Keywords
Immigration; Political Economy; Fiscal Sustainability;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Boldrin, Michele and Aldo Rustichini. 2000. "Political equilibria with social security," Review of Economic Dynamics, 3(1): 41-78.   DOI
2 Besley, Timothy and Stephen Coate. 1998. "Sources of inefficiency in a representative democracy: a dynamic analysis," American Economic Review, 88(1): 139-156.
3 Dolmas, Jim and Gregory W. Huffman. 2004. "On the political economy of immigration and income redistribution," International Economic Review, 45(4): 1129-1168.   DOI
4 Grossman, Gene and Elhanan Helpman. 1998. "Intergenerational redistribution with short-lived governments," The Economic Journal, 108(450): 1299-1329.   DOI
5 Peri, Giovanni. 2012. "The effect of immigration on productivity: Evidence from US states," Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(1): 348-358.   DOI
6 Storesletten, Kjetil. 2000. "Sustaining Fiscal Policy through Immigration," Journal of Political Economy, 108(2): 300-323.   DOI
7 Suwankiri, Benjarong, Assaf Razin, and Efraim Sadka. 2016. "The welfare State and migration: a dynamic analysis of political coalitions," Research in Economics, 70(1): 122-142.   DOI
8 Besley, Timothy and Stephen Coate. 1997. "An economic model of representative democracy," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1): 85-114.   DOI
9 Benhabib, Jess. 1996. "On the political economy of immigration." European Economic Review, 40(9): 1737-1743.   DOI
10 Galasso, Vincenzo and Paola Profeta. 2002. "The political economy of social security: a survey," European Journal of Political Economy, 18(1): 1-29.   DOI
11 Hassler, John, et al. 2003. "The survival of the welfare state," American Economic Review, 93(1): 87-112.   DOI
12 Ortega, Francesc. 2005. "Immigration quotas and skill upgrading," Journal of Public Economics, 89(9-10): 1841-1863.   DOI
13 Krusell, Per and Jose-Victor Rios-Rull. 1996. "Vested interests in a positive theory of stagnation and growth," The Review of Economic Studies, 63(2): 301-329.   DOI
14 Hunt, Jennifer and Marjolaine Gauthier-Loiselle. 2010. "How much does immigration boost innovation?" American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(2): 31-56.   DOI
15 Monte, Lindsay M. and Renee Ellis. 2014. Fertility of women in the United States: 2012, US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.
16 Auerbach, Alan J. and Philip Oreopoulos. 1999. "Analyzing the Fiscal Impact of US Immigration," The American Economic Review, 89(2): 176-180.   DOI