Browse > Article

A Methodology for the Development of NCO Effectiveness Analysis Model based on the Reference Model  

Lim, Nam-Kyu (아주대학교 일반대학원 NCW학과)
Lee, Tae-Gong (아주대학교 정보통신대학원)
Son, Hyun-Sik (아주대학교 일반대학원 NCW학과)
Park, Ji-Hyeon (국방과학연구소)
Kim, Jae-Won (국방과학연구소)
Publication Information
Journal of the military operations research society of Korea / v.36, no.3, 2010 , pp. 95-111 More about this Journal
Abstract
The NCO effectiveness analysis related elements and their relationship are more complicated than the PCW. However, Effectiveness analysis models provide single effectiveness element centric effective analysis method so far. Therefore, A model to provide unified view and common language about NCO effectiveness is required. EA use reference model as a common language to control complexity and change. The objective of this study is presenting a methodology to develop NCO effectiveness analysis model based on reference model and implementation model concept. To do this, First, the concept of EA based reference and implementation model is studied, Second, we study related effectiveness analysis method and model component and their relationship identification methodology, third, we propose methodology to develop NCO effectiveness analysis model. Finally, we prove the effectiveness of the methodology using case study.
Keywords
NCO;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Stanley M. Halpin The Army Command and Control Evaluation System (ACCES), Army Research Institute, 1996.
2 CCRP, NATO Code of Best Practice for C2 Assessment,2002.
3 OBM FEA Consolidated Reference Model Document Ver 2.3 2007.
4 정보통신부, .법정부 서비스컴포넌트 참조모형 1.0 2006.
5 정보통신부, 범정부 기술 참조모형 1.0, 2006
6 NATO C3 Board, Nato Architecture Framework Version 3.0, 2007
7 WaIter Perry, John Gordon, Michael Boito, Gina Kingston, Network-Based Operations for the Swedish Defence Forces An Assessment Methodology, RAND, 2004, TR-119-FOI.
8 John Garstka OFT, Network Centric Operations Conceptual Framework Version 2.0, Office of the Transformation, 2004.
9 DoD, Department of Defense Architecture Framework Version 2.0, 2009
10 MoD, Ministry of Defense Architecture Framework Version 1.2, 2008
11 TRADOC, Command and Control Measure of Effectiveness Handbook, 1993.
12 IDEFO, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDEFO 자료검색일 2010.10.01.
13 Alberts,Hayes,Understanding Information Age Warfare,CCRP, 2006.
14 T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierachy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York. 1980.
15 임남규, 이태공, 엔터프라이즈 아키텍처기반 시스템 상호운용성 향상방안, 제12차 통신전자 학술대회, 2008
16 Keeney, Ralph L. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
17 Keeney, Ralph L. "Creativity in Decision Making with Value-Focused Thinking," Sloan Management Review, 35: 33-41 Summer 1994.
18 Douglas E, Mason, Identitying Measures of Effectiveness for Marine Corps C4I systems, Naval Postgraduates School.
19 NATO, Exploring New Command and Contrlol Concepts and Capabilities, SAS-050 Report, 2006.
20 Federal CIO Council, Federal Segment Architecture Methodology Ver 1.0 2008.
21 Australian Government, DoD, NCW ROADMAP 2009, 2009.
22 임남규, 손현식 외, 국방아키텍처 경향 및 MND-AF 발전방향,JITA Vol.6. NO.2. 2009
23 이태공, NCW 이론과 응용, 흥릉과학출판사, 2007.
24 이태공, 정보기술아키텍처 편람, 국방대학교, 2003.
25 Dstl/IMD/SOS/500/2, NEC OUTLINE CONCEPT: PART 1 - BACKGROUND AND PROGRAMME OF WORK, 2003.
26 Mark.Unewisse, An Australian Approach to Assessing Force-Level Network-Centric Warfare (NCW) Readiness, 11th ICCRTS .2006.