Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2017.24.1.51

Nursing Students' Perceptions of Meaning, Response, and Effective Methods for Debriefing in Simulation-based Education  

Kim, Eun Jung (Division of Nursing, Hallym University)
Kim, Young-Ju (College of Nursing, Sungshin Women's University)
Moon, Seongmi (Department of Nursing, University of Ulsan)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing / v.24, no.1, 2017 , pp. 51-59 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study in which an exploration was done of how nursing students perceive debriefing and what they think are the most effective debriefing methods for simulation-based nursing education. Methods: A convenience sample of 296 sophomore, junior and senior nursing students from three universities and who had attended simulation classes participated in this study. Survey data garnered was analyzed using descriptive analysis and $x^2$ test. Results: A high majority of the participants (98.3%) saw debriefing as "learning from mistakes", while 62.8% considered it more important than simulations/scenarios. They also perceived debriefing to be effective when they analyzed their colleagues' and their own performances and received feedback. Sophomore students preferred writing a reflection paper as an effective debriefing method compared to junior and senior students. Conclusion: The study findings indicate that debriefing is an important component of simulation-based education and should be considered part of the teaching strategies with debriefing methods dependent on themes and scenarios and what is needed to achieve learning outcomes.
Keywords
Debriefing; Nursing students; Patient simulation; Perceptions;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lasater K. Clinical judgment: The last frontier for evaluation. Nurse Education in Practice. 2011;11(2):86-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.11.013   DOI
2 Arafeh JM, Hansen SS, Nichols A. Debriefing in simulatedbased learning: Facilitating a reflective discussion. Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing. 2010;24(4):302-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181f6b5ec   DOI
3 Kim HJ. The effects of suction care self video-based debriefing- assisted learning in the fundamentals of nursing practice. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Home Care Nursing. 2015;22(1):88-97.
4 Choi EH, Lee EJ. Clinical practice and debriefing satisfaction after simulation debriefing with video. Journal of Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing. 2015;3(2):23-33.
5 Kim J, Heo N. Learner's debriefing experience on team-based nursing simulation. Journal of Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing. 2015;3(2):35-44.
6 Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulationbased learning. Simulation in Healthcare. 2007;2(2):115-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539   DOI
7 Dreifuerst KT. The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: A concept analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2009; 30(2):109-114.
8 Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich WJ. Debriefing as formative assessment: Closing performance gaps in medical education. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2008;15(11):1010- 1016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00248.x   DOI
9 Ha EH. Attitudes toward video-assisted debriefing after simulation in undergraduate nursing students: An application of Q methodology. Nurse Education Today. 2014;34(6):978-984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.01.003   DOI
10 Palaganas JC, Flanagan B. Simon R. Debriefing: Theory and techniques. In: Riley RH, editor. Manual of simulation in healthcare, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008 p. 155-170.
11 Bond WF, Deitrick LM, Arnold DC, Kostenbader M, Barr GC, Kimmel SR, et al. Using simulation to instruct emergency medicine residents in cognitive forcing strategies. Academic Medicine. 2004;79(5):438-446.   DOI
12 Cantrell MA. The importance of debriefing in clinical simulations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2008;4(2):e19-e23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2008.06.006   DOI
13 Durham CF. The international nursing association for clinical simulation and learning (INACSL), a community of practice for simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2013;9(8):e275- e276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.06.005   DOI
14 Dreifuerst KT. Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation. Journal of Nursing Education. 2012;51(6):326-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20120409-02   DOI
15 Mariani B, Cantrell MA, Meakim C, Prieto P, Dreifuerst KT. Structured debriefing and students' clinical judgment abilities in simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2013;9(5):e147-e155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2011.11.009   DOI
16 Shinnick MA, Woo M, Horwich TB, Steadman R. Debriefing: The most important component in simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2011;7(3):e105-e111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.11.005   DOI
17 Waznonis AR. Methods and evaluations for simulation debriefing in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education. 2014; 53(8):459-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140722-13   DOI
18 Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee GD, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher. 2005;27(1):10-28.   DOI
19 Gordon CJ, Buckley T. The effect of high-fidelity simulation training on medical-surgical graduate nurses' perceived ability to respond to patient clinical emergencies. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 2009;40(11):491-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20091023-06   DOI
20 O'Donnell J, Rodgers D, Lee W, Edelson D, Haag J, Hamilton M, et al. Structured and supported debriefing. Dallas, Tex: American Heart Association; 2009.
21 Mariani B, Cantrell MA, Meakim C. Nurse educators' perceptions about structured debriefing in clinical simulation. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2014;35(5):330-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.5480/13-1190.1   DOI