Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2015.22.3.318

Comparison of Confidence in Practice and Satisfaction by Feedback Types Following Objective Structured Clinical Examination(OSCE) among Nursing Students - Focus on Intermittent Gavage Tube Feeding -  

Gil, Eunha (The Graduate School of Eulji University College of Nursing)
Oh, Heeyoung (Eulji University College of Nursing)
Shin, Seonkyoung (Daejeon Institute of Science And Technology College of Nursing)
Park, Yeonhee (Jungwon University College of Nursing)
Lee, Yeeun (Wonkwang Health Science University College of Nursing)
Park, Jeong Ah (The Graduate School of Eulji University College of Nursing)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing / v.22, no.3, 2015 , pp. 318-327 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purposes of this study were to compare confidence in practice of intermittent gavage tube feeding and participants' satisfaction by three types of feedback; professor verbal feedback, professor feedback with smartphone video, and peer feedback with smartphone video. In addition, frequently failed items in the intermittent gavage tube feeding procedure were analyzed. Methods: Data were collected from a convenience sample of 78 nursing college students in November 2014. Students were randomly assigned to the control group, experimental group I (smartphone video with professor feedback) or group II (smartphone video with peer feedback). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics including chi-square test, ANOVA, and Scheffe test with SPSS 21.0. Results: Confidence in practice of intermittent gavage tube feeding and satisfaction with feedback were highest in experimental group I that had professor feedback with smartphone video. For the procedure, the most frequently failed item was giving an explanation to patients about the purpose and the procedure of tube feeding. Conclusion: The results indicate that professor verbal feedback with smartphone video is the most benefit to the nursing students in acquiring core nursing practice skills.
Keywords
Feedback; Smartphone; Tube feeding; Satisfaction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 10  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kown IS, Seo YM. Nursing students' needs for clinical nursing education. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2012;18(1):25-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.1.025   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Cho MH, Kwon IS. A study on the clinical practice experiences on nursing activities of nursing students. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2007;13(2):143-154.
3 Barrows HS, Abrahamson S. The programmed patient: A technique for appraising student performance in clinical neurology. Journal of Medical Education. 1964;39(8):802-805.
4 Yoon J, Kim KJ, Choi MS. The effects of OSCE application before clinical practice for nursing students. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2013;19(2):273-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.2.273   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Park JY. Self-assessment, self-efficacy and satisfaction after OSCE using smart phone. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2012;18(1):120-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.1.120   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Cheung NY, Song YS. Clinical application of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for novice nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2006;13(3):334-342.
7 Yoo MS, Yoo IY. Effect of OSCE method on performance of clinical skills of students in fundamentals of nursing course. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2003;33(2):228-235.   DOI
8 Han MH. A clinical skill test using OSCE modules developed by nursing students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2006;12(3):365-372.
9 Han MH, Park SG. Analysis of trends in self-assessment of performance of clinical skills in nursing students after OSCE. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2011;18(2):210-216.
10 Kim YH. Satisfaction with evaluation method for fundamental nursing practical skill education through cell phone animation self-monitoring and feedback-Focus on foley catheterization-. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2008;15(2):134-142.
11 Im SJ, Yune SJ, Kang SY, Lee SY, Kim HK, Jeong HJ. The effect of direct feedback in teaching endotracheal intubation. Korean Journal of Medical Education. 2007;19(4):325-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2007.19.4.325   DOI
12 Kovacs G, Bullock G, Ackroyd-Stolarz S, Cain E, Petrie D. A randomized controlled trial on the effect of educational interventions in promoting airway management skill maintenance. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2000;36(4):301-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mem.2000.109339   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Wulf G, Shea CH. Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2002;9(2):185-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03196276   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Edwards A, Tzelepis A, Klingbeil C, Melgar T, Speece M, Schubiner H, et al. Fifteen years of a videotape review program for internal medicine and medicine-pediatrics residents. Academic Medicine. 1996;71(7):744-748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199607000-00006   DOI
15 Cheon EY. The effects of video-aided peer feedback on enhancing nursing students' understanding of foley catheterization. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2013;19(1):43-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.1.43   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Cowin LS, Hengstberger-Sims C. New graduate nurse self-concept and retention: A longitudinal survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2006;43(1):59-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Violato C, Lockyer J. Self and peer assessment of pediatricians, psychiatrists and medicine specialists: Implications for self-directed learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2006;11(3):235-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-005-5639-0   DOI
18 Mendonca CO, Johnson KE. Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly. 1994;28(4):745-769. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587558   DOI
19 Fesler-Birch DM. Critical thinking and patient outcomes: A review. Nursing Outlook. 2005;53(2):59-65.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Sung MH. Correlations between motivation to achieve, clinical competency and satisfaction in clinical practice for diploma and baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2010;17(1):90-98.
21 Kim YH, Hwang SY, Lee AY. Perceived confidence in practice of core basic nursing skills of new graduate nurses. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2014;20(1):37-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2014.20.1.37   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education. Nursing education accreditation-Essential of fundamental nursing skills evaluation items protocol revision (The third edition) [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education; 2014 [cited 2014 September 01]. Avaliable from: http://kabone.or.kr/HyAdmin/upload/goodFile/120140117153430.pdf.
23 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlation: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin. 1979;86(2):420-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420   DOI
24 Wood BP. Feedback: A key feature of medical training. Radiology. 2000;215(1):17-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap5917   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Park YR. Knowledge, attitude and self-confidence of student nurses regarding nosocomial infection control. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2007;14(4):429-436.
26 NAVER. NAVER a Korean language dictionary [Internet]. Seoul: NAVER; 2014 [cited 2014 September 01]. Avaliable from: http://krdic.naver.com/detail.nhn?docid=12720700.
27 Torre DM, Sebastian JL, Simpson DE. Learning activities and high-quality teaching: Perceptions of third-year IM clerkship students. Academic Medicine. 2003;78(8):812-814.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Bienstock JL, Katz NT, Cox SM, Hueppchen N, Erickson S, Puscheck EE. To the point: Medical education reviews-Providing feedback. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;196(6):508-513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.021   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Topping KJ. Peer assisted learning: A practical guide for teachers. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books; 2001.