Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/smm.2017.4.1.053

Sensor selection approach for damage identification based on response sensitivity  

Wang, Juan (Beijing's Key Laboratory of Structural Wind Engineering and Urban Wind Environment, School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University)
Yang, Qing-Shan (Beijing's Key Laboratory of Structural Wind Engineering and Urban Wind Environment, School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University)
Publication Information
Structural Monitoring and Maintenance / v.4, no.1, 2017 , pp. 53-68 More about this Journal
Abstract
The response sensitivity method in time domain has been applied extensively for damage identification. In this paper, the relationship between the error of damage identification and the sensitivity matrix is investigated through perturbation analysis. An index is defined according to the perturbation amplify effect and an optimal sensor placement method is proposed based on the minimization of that index. A sequential sub-optimal algorithm is presented which results in consistently good location selection. Numerical simulations with a two-dimensional high truss structure are conducted to validate the proposed method. Results reveal that the damage identification using the optimal sensor placement determined by the proposed method can identify multiple damages of the structure more accurately.
Keywords
sensor selection; damage identification; response sensitivity; perturbation amplify effect; sequential algorithm;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Agbabian, M.S., Masri, S.F. and Caughey, T.K. (1991), "System identification approach to detection of structural changes", J. Eng. Mech., 117(2), 370-390.   DOI
2 Cobb, R.G. and Liebst, B.S. (1997), "Sensor placement and structural damage identification from minimal sensor information", AIAA J., 35(2), 369-374.   DOI
3 Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B. and Shevitz, D.W. (1996), "Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review", Report LA-13070-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory.
4 Golub, G.H. and Van Loan, C.F. (1996), Matrix Computation. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA.
5 Hansen, P.C. (1987), "The truncated SVD as a method for regularization", BIT. Num. Math., 27(4), 534-553.   DOI
6 Hansen, P.C. (1992), "Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve", SIAM. Rew., 34(4), 561-580.   DOI
7 Heo, G., Wang, M.L. and Satpathi, D. (1997), "Optimal transducer placement for health monitoring of long span bridge", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 16(7), 495-502.   DOI
8 Kammer, D.C. (1992), "Effects of noise on sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification of large space structures", J. Dyn. Syst.-T, ASME, 144(3), 436-443.
9 Kripakaran, P. and Smith, L.F.C. (2009), "Configuring and enhancing measurement systems for damage identification", Adv. Eng. Inform., 23(4), 424-432.   DOI
10 Law, S.S. and Ding, Y. (2011), "Substructure methods for structural condition assessment", J. Sound Vib., 330(15), 3606-3619.   DOI
11 Li, X.Y. and Law, S.S. (2010), "Adaptive Tikhonov regularization for damage detection based on nonlinear model updating", Mech. Syst. Sign. Proc., 24(6), 1646-1664.   DOI
12 Lu, Z.R. and Law, S.S. (2007a), "Features of dynamic response sensitivity and its application in damage detection", J. Sound Vib., 303(1-2), 305-329.   DOI
13 Lu, Z.R. and Law, S.S. (2007b), "Identification of system parameters and input force from output only", Mech. Syst. Sign. Proc., 21(5), 2099-2111.   DOI
14 Meo, M. and Zumpano, G. (2005), "On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure", Eng. Struct., 27(10), 1488-1497.   DOI
15 Nagarajaiah, S. and Basu, B. (2009), "Output only modal identification and structural damage detection using time frequency & wavelet techniques", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 8(4), 583-605.   DOI
16 Padey, A.K., Biswas, M. and Samman, M.M. (1991), "Damage detection from changes in curvature shapes", J. Sound Vib., 145(2), 121-132.
17 Padey, A.K. and Biswas, M. (1994), "Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility", J. Sound Vib., 169(1), 3-17   DOI
18 Papadimitriou, C., Beck J.L. and Au S.K. (2000), "Entropy-based optimal sensor location for structural model updating", J. Vib. Control, 6(5), 781-800.   DOI
19 Shi, Z.Y., Law, S.S. and Zhang, L.M. (2000a), "Optimal sensor placement for structural damage detection", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 126(11), 1173-1179.   DOI
20 Sanayei, M. and Salethik, M.J. (1996), "Parameter estimation of structures from static strain measurements Part II: error sensitivity analysis", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 122(5), 563-572.   DOI
21 Shi, Z.Y., Law, S.S and Zhang, L.M. (2000b), "Structural damage detection from modal strain energy change", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 126(12), 1216-1223.   DOI
22 Tikhonov, A.N. (1995), Numerical Methods for the solution of Ill-posed problems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, USA.
23 Udwadia, F.E. (1994), "Methodology for optimum sensor locations for parameter identification in dynamic systems", J. Eng. Mech., 120(2), 368-390.   DOI
24 Wang, J. and Yang, Q.S. (2012), "Modified Tikhonov Regularization in model updating for damage identification", Struct. Eng. Mech., 44(5), 585-600.   DOI
25 Weber, B., Paultre, P. and Proulx, J. (2009), "Consistent regularization of nonlinear model updating for damage identification", Mech. Syst. Sign. Proc., 23(6), 1965-1985.   DOI
26 Xia, Y. and Hao, H. (2000), "Measurement selection for vibration-based structural damage identification", J. Sound Vib., 236(1), 89-104.   DOI
27 Yuen, K.V., Katafygiotis, L.S., Papadimitriou, C. and Mickleborough, N.C. (2001), "Optimal Sensor Placement Methodology for Identification with Unmeasured Excitation", J. Dyn. Syst-T, 123(4), 677-686.   DOI
28 Yuen, K.V. and Kuok, S.C. (2015), "Efficient Bayesian sensor placement algorithm for structural identification: a general approach for multi-type sensory systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 44(5), 757-774.   DOI