Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4313/TEEM.2017.18.5.287

Applying TID-PSS to Enhance Dynamic Stability of Multi-Machine Power Systems  

Mohammadi, Ramin Shir (Department of Electrical Engineering, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University)
Mehdizadeh, Ali (Department of Electrical Engineering, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University)
Kalantari, Navid Taghizadegan (Department of Electrical Engineering, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University)
Publication Information
Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Materials / v.18, no.5, 2017 , pp. 287-297 More about this Journal
Abstract
Novel power system stabilizers (PSSs) have been proposed to effectively dampen low frequency oscillations (LFOs) in multi-machine power systems and have attracted increasing research interest in recent years. Due to this attention, recently, fractional order controllers (FOCs) have found new applications in power system stability issues. Here, a tilt-integral-derivative power system stabilizer (TID-PSS) is proposed to enhance the dynamic stability of a multi-machine power system by providing additional damping to the LFOs. The TID is an extended version of the classical proportional-integral-derivative (PID) applying fractional calculus. The design of the proposed three-parameter tunable TID-PSS is systematized as a nonlinear time domain optimization problem in which the tunable parameters are adjusted concurrently using a modified group search optimization (MGSO) algorithm. An integral of the time multiplied squared error (ITSE) performance index is considered as the objective function. The proposed stabilizer is simulated in the MATLAB/SIMULINK environment using the FOMCON toolbox and the dynamic performance is evaluated on a 3-machine 6-bus power system. The TID-PSS is compared with both classical PID-PSS (PID-PSS) and conventional PSS (CPSS) using eigenvalue analysis and time domain simulations. Sensitivity analyses are performed to assess the robustness of the proposed controller against large changes in system loading conditions and parameters. The results indicate that the proposed TID-PSS provides the better dynamic performance and robustness compared with the PID-PSS and CPSS.
Keywords
TID-PSS; ITSE; MGSO; Multi-machine power system; FOMCON toolbox; Dynamic stability; Sensitivity analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 B. J. Lurie, U. S. 5371670, Dee. 6, 1994.
2 I. Chathoth, S. K. Ramdas, and S. T. Krishnan, Electr. Pow. Compo. Sys., 43, 1931 (2015). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2015.1072256]   DOI
3 R. K. Sahu, S. Panda, A. Biswal, and G. C. Sekhar, ISA Transactions, 61, 251 (2016). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2015.12.001]   DOI
4 I. Pan and S. Das, Electr. Power Energy Syst., 51, 106 (2013). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.02.021]   DOI
5 Y. Tang, M. Cui, C., Hua, L. Li, and Y. Yang, Expert Syst. Appl., 39, 6887 (2012). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.007]   DOI
6 I. Pan and S. Das, Electr. Power Energy Syst., 43, 393 (2012). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.06.034]   DOI
7 S. Das and I. Pan, IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., 10, 1982 (2014). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2014.2322812]   DOI
8 M. Zamani, M. Karimi-Ghartemani, N. Sadati, and M. Parniani, Control Eng. Pract., 17, 1380 (2009). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac. 2009.07.005]   DOI
9 F. Merrikh-Bayat, ISA Transactions, 50, 170 (2011). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2011.01.002]   DOI
10 A. Oustaloup, P. Melchior, P. Lanusse, O. Cois, and F. Dancla, Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design (Cat. No.00TH8537) (IEEE, Anchorage, AK, USA, 2000) p. 190. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CACSD.2000.900210]
11 D. Valerio and J. S. da Costa, Proc. the First IFAC Workshop on Fractional Differentiation and Applications (Hohai University, Bordeaux, France, 2004) p. 208.
12 A. Tepljakov, E. Petlenkov, and J. Belikov, Proc. the 18th International Conference Mixed Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems - MIXDES 2011 (IEEE, Gliwice, Poland , 2011) p. 684.
13 A. Tepljakov, Fractional-order Calculus Based Identification and Control of Linear Dynamic Systems, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia (2011).
14 A. Tepljakov, E. Petlenkov, J. Belikov, and J. Finajev, Proc. 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Aided Control System Design (CACSD) (IEEE, Hyderabad, India, 2013) p. 340.
15 A. Tepljakov, E. Petlenkov, J. Belikov, and S. Astapov, International Journal of Microelectronics and Computer Science, 4, 116 (2013).
16 J. Jannati and D. Nazarpour, Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater., 17, 341. [DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4313/TEEM.2016.17.6.341]
17 A. Khodabakhshian and R. Hemmati, Electr. Power Energy Syst., 44, 571 (2013). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.07.049]   DOI
18 S. Abd-Elazim and E. Ali, Electr. Power Energy Syst., 46, 334 (2013). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.10.047]   DOI
19 H. Bevrani, T. Hiyama, and H. Bevrani, Electr. Power Energy Syst., 33, 179 (2011). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.08.013]   DOI
20 H. A. Shayanfar, A. Ghasemi, O. Abedinia, H. R. Izadfar, and N. Amjady, International Journal on Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering (IJTPE), 4, 75 (2012).
21 D. G. Varghese, International Journal of Engineering, 2, 535 (2013).
22 J. Morsali, K. Zare, and M. T. Hagh, IET Gener. Transm. Dis., 11, 193 (2016). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0828]
23 J. Morsali, R. Kazemzadeh, M. Azizian, and A. Parhizkar, Proc. 2014 22nd Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE) (IEEE, Tehran, Iran, 2014) p. 836. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IranianCEE.2014.6999652]
24 IEEE Power Engineering Society, IEEE Std 421.5, April 21, 2005.
25 C. A. Monje, Y. Chen, B. M. Vinagre, D. Xue, and V. Feliu-Batlle, Fractionalorder Systems and Controls: Fundamentals and Applications (Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2010).
26 D. Baleanu, J.A.T. Machado, and A. C. Luo, Fractional dynamics and control (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2012).
27 C. A. Monje, B. M. Vinagre, V. Feliu, and Y. Chen, Control Eng. Pract., 16, 798 (2008). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2007.08.006]   DOI
28 S. Debbarma, L. C. Saikia, and N. Sinha, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 95, 175 (2013). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2012.09.008]   DOI
29 I. Pan and S. Das, Appl. Soft Comput., 29, 328 (2015). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.12.032]   DOI
30 A. Tepljakov, E. Petlenkov, and J. Belikov, International Journal of Microelectronics and Computer Science, 2, 51 (2011).
31 K. Zare, M. T. Haque, and E. Davoodi, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 84, 83 (2012). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2011.10.004]   DOI
32 J. Morsali, K. Zare, and M. T. Hagh, Engineering Science and Technology, 20, 1 (2016). [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.06.002]
33 D. Xue and Y. Chen, Proc. the 4th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (Cat. No.02EX527) (IEEE, Shanghai, China, 2002) p. 3228. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WCICA.2002.1020131]
34 J. Morsali, R. Kazemzadeh, and M. Azizian, Proc. 2015 23rd Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (IEEE, Tehran, Iran, 2015) p. 1510. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IranianCEE.2015.7146459]