Browse > Article

Comparison of Monte Carlo Simulation and Fuzzy Math Computation for Validation of Summation in Quantitative Risk Assessment  

Im, Myung-Nam (Department of Food Science and Technology, Dongguk University)
Lee, Seung-Ju (Department of Food Science and Technology, Dongguk University)
Publication Information
Food Science and Biotechnology / v.16, no.3, 2007 , pp. 361-366 More about this Journal
Abstract
As the application of quantitative risk assessment (QRA) to food safety becomes widespread, it is now being questioned whether experimental results and simulated results coincide. Therefore, this paper comparatively analyzed experimental data and simulated data of the cross contamination, which needs summation of the simplest calculations in QRA, of chicken by Monte Carlo simulation and fuzzy math computation. In order to verify summation, the following basic operation was performed. For the experiment, thigh, breast, and a mixture of both parts were preserved for 24 hr at $20^{\circ}C$, and then the cell number of Salmonella spp. was measured. In order to examine the differences between experimental results and simulated results, we applied the descriptive statistics. The result was that mean value by fuzzy math computation was more similar to the experimental than that by Monte Carlo simulation, whereas other statistical descriptors by Monte Carlo simulation were more similar.
Keywords
quantitative risk assessment (QRA); Monte Carlo simulation; fuzzy math computation; summation; Salmonella spp.;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Parsons DJ, Orton TG, D'Souza J, Moore A, Jones R, Dodd CER. A comparison of three modeling approaches for quantitative risk assessment using the case study of Salmonella spp. in poultry meat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 98: 35-51 (2005)   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Kim CR, Koh DH, Kim YJ, Kim KH, Choi IK, Eun JB. Microbiological evaluations of retail and refrigerated chickens in winter. Korean J. Food Nutr. 12: 109-112 (1999)
3 Kwak HJ, Lee SO, Jung IC. Irradiation of chicken for the improvement of hygiene. Korean J. Culinary Res. 8: 249-257 (2002)
4 Oscar TP. A quantitative risk assessment model for Salmonella and whole chickens. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 93: 231-247 (2004)   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Oscar TP. Development and validation of a tertiary simulation model for predicting the potential growth of Salmonella typhimurium on cooked chicken. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 76: 177-190 (2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Vose DJ. The application of quantitative risk assessment to microbial food safety. J. Food Protect. 61: 640-648 (1998)   DOI
7 Poschet F, Geeraerd AH, Van Loey AM, Hendrickx ME, Van Impe JF. Assessing the optimal experiment setup for first order kinetic studies by Monte Carlo analysis. Food Control 16: 873-882 (2005)   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Davidson VJ, Ryks J. Comparison of Monte Carlo and fuzzy math simulation methods for quantitative microbial risk assessment. J. Food Protect. 66: 1900-1910 (2003)   DOI
9 Lee SJ. Introduction to the fuzzy theory. Food Sci. Ind. 33: 20-26 (2000)
10 Poschet F, Geeraerd AB, Scheerlinck N, Nicolai BM, Van Impe JF. Monte Carlo analysis as a tool to incorporate variation on experimental data in predictive microbiology. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 20: 285-295 (2003)   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Zhang Q, Lichfield JB. Applying fuzzy mathematics to product development and comparison. Food Technol. -Chicago 45: 108-112 (1991)
12 Palisade Corp. Guide to Using @RISK: Risk Analysis and Simulation Add-in for Microsoft Excel, Vers. 4. Palisade Corp., Newfield, NY, USA (2000)
13 Klir GJ, Folger TA. Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty, and Information. Prentice-Hall International, Inc., London, UK. pp. 1-32 (1988)
14 Lammerding AM. An overview of microbial food safety risk assessment. J. Food Protect. 60: 1420-1425 (1997)   DOI
15 Hoornstra E, Northolt MD, Notermans S, Barendsz AW.The use of quantitative risk assessment in HACCP. Food Control 12: 229-234 (2001)   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Nauta MJ. Separation of uncertainty and variability in quantitative microbial risk assessment. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 57: 9-18 (2000)   DOI   ScienceOn