1 |
Brockhoff PB, Schlich P. Handling replications in discrimination tests. Food Qual. Prefer. 9: 303-312 (1998)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Harries JM, Smith GL. The two-factor triangle test. J. Food Technol. 17: 153-162 (1982)
DOI
|
3 |
Bi J, Ennis DM. The power of sensory discrimination methods used in replicated difference and preference tests. J. Sens. Stud. 14: 289-302 (1999a)
DOI
|
4 |
O'Mahony M. Sensory Evaluation of Food. Statistical Methods and Procedures. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, USA. pp.408-413 (1986)
|
5 |
Braun V, Rogeaux M, Schneid N, O'Mahony M, Rousseau B. Corroborating the 2-AFC and 2-AC Thurstonian models using both a model system and sparkling water. Food Qual. Prefer. 15: 501-507 (2004)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Delwiche J, Ligget R. Accounting for between-subject variance in discrimination and preference tasks. J. Sens. Stud. 20: 48-61 (2005)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Ennis DM, Bi J. The beta-binomial model: accounting for inter-trial variation in replicated difference and preference tests. J. Sens. Stud. 13: 389-412 (1998)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Brockhoff PB. The statistical power of replications in difference tests. Food Qual. Prefer. 14: 405-417 (2003)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Angulo O, Lee HS, O'Mahony M. Sensory difference tests: Over-dispersion and warm-up. Food Qual. Prefer. 17: in press (2006)
|
10 |
O'Mahony M, Thieme U, Goldstein LR. The warm-up effect as a measure of increasing the discriminability of sensory difference tests. J. Food Sci. 53: 1848-1850 (1988)
DOI
|
11 |
Thieme U, O'Mahony M. Modifications to sensory difference test protocols: the warmed up paired comparison, the single standard duo-trio and the A-not A test modified for response bias. J. Sens. Stud. 5: 159-176 (1990)
DOI
|
12 |
Bi J, Ennis DM. Beta-binomial tables for replicated difference and preference tests. J. Sens. Stud. 14: 347-368 (1999b)
DOI
|
13 |
Lee H-S, O'Mahony M. Sensory difference testing: Thurstonian models. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 13: 841-847 (2004)
|
14 |
Dacremont C, Sauvageot F, Duyen TH. Effect of assessors expertise on efficiency of warm-up for triangle tests. J. Sens. Stud. 15: 151-152 (2000)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Bi J, Templeton-Janik L, Ennis JM, Ennis DM. Replicated difference and preference tests: how to account for inter-trial variation. Food Qual. Prefer. 11: 269-273 (2000)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Rousseau B, O'Mahony M. Investigation of the effect within-trial retasting and comparison of the dual-pair, same-different, and triangle paradigms. Food Qual. Prefer. 11: 457-464 (2000)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Rousseau B, O'Mahony M. Investigation of the dual pair method as a possible alternative to the triangle and same-different tests. J. Sens. Stud. 16: 161-178 (2001)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Hautus MJ, Irwin RJ. Two models for estimating the discriminability of foods and beverages. J. Sens. Stud. 10: 203-215 (1995)
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Bi J. Ennis DM. A Thurstonian variant of the beta-binomial model for replicated difference tests. J. Sens. Stud. 13: 461-466 (1998)
DOI
ScienceOn
|