Browse > Article

An Approximation Method in Collaborative Optimization for Engine Selection coupled with Propulsion Performance Prediction  

Jang, Beom-Seon (Structure/Shipbuilding & Plant R&D Institute, Samsung Heavy Industries)
Yang, Young-Soon (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University)
Suh, Jung-Chun (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Ship and Ocean Technology / v.8, no.2, 2004 , pp. 41-60 More about this Journal
Abstract
Ship design process requires lots of complicated analyses for determining a large number of design variables. Due to its complexity, the process is divided into several tractable designs or analysis problems. The interdependent relationship requires repetitive works. This paper employs collaborative optimization (CO), one of the multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) techniques, for treating such complex relationship. CO guarantees disciplinary autonomy while maintaining interdisciplinary compatibility due to its bi-level optimization structure. However, the considerably increased computational time and the slow convergence have been reported as its drawbacks. This paper proposes the use of an approximation model in place of the disciplinary optimization in the system-level optimization. Neural network classification is employed as a classifier to determine whether a design point is feasible or not. Kriging is also combined with the classification to make up for the weakness that the classification cannot estimate the degree of infeasibility. For the purpose of enhancing the accuracy of a predicted optimum and reducing the required number of disciplinary optimizations, an approximation management framework is also employed in the system-level optimization.
Keywords
collaborative optimization; neural network classification; approximation management framework; engine selection; propeller design;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Balling, R. J. and J. Sobieszcznski-Sobieski. 1996. Optimization of coupled systems: a critical overview of approaches. AIAA Journal, 34, 1, 6-17
2 Booker, A. J., J.E. Dennis Jr., P.D. Frank, D.B. Serafini, V. Torczon and M.W. Trosset.1999. A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates. Struct. Optim., 17, 1-13
3 Kroo, I.M. and Y.M. Manning. 2000. Collaborative optimization: status and directions. Proc. 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symp. on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA-2000-4721
4 Sobieski, I.P., V.M. Manning and I.M. Kroo. 1998. Response surface estimation and refinement in collaborative optimization. Proc. 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symp. on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA 98-4753, 359-370
5 Yang, Y.S., B.S. Jang, Y.S. Yeun and H.S. Jung. 2000. A framework for managing approximation models in place of expensive simulations in optimization. Proc. 2nd ASMO UK/ISSMO Conference on Engineering Design Optimization, 249-256
6 Kroo, 1., S. Altus, R. Braun, P. Gage and I. Sobieski. 1994. Multidisciplinary optimization methods for aircraft preliminary design. Proc. 5th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA 94-4325, 1, 697-707
7 Holtrop, J. and G.G.J. Mennen. 1982. An approximate power prediction method. International Shipbuilding Process, 166-170
8 Alexandrov, N.M., and R.M. Lewis. 1999. Comparative properties of collaborative optimization and other approaches to MDO. Technical Report, 99-24, ICASE, Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA
9 Yang, Y.S., B.S. Jang, Y.S. Yeun and W.S. Ruy. 2002. Managing approximation models in multi-objective optimization. Struct. Optim., 24, 141-156
10 Alexandrov, N.M., and R.M. Lewis. 2000. Analytical and computational properties of distributed approaches to MDO. Proc. 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symp. on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA-2000-4718, 13-42
11 Braun, R.D. 1996. Collaborative Optimization: An Architecture for Large-Scale Distributed Design. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University
12 Holtrop, J. 1984. A statistical re-analysis of resistance and propulsion data. International Shipbuilding Progress, 272-276
13 Neu, W.L., W.H. Mason, S. Ni, Z. Lin, A. Dasgupta and Y. Chen. 2000. A multidisciplinary design optimization scheme for containerships. Proc. 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symp. on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA-2000-4791
14 Haykin, S. 1994. Neural Networks, A Comprehensive Foundation. Macmillian College Publishing Company
15 Sobieski, I.P., 1998. Multidisciplinary Design using Collaborative Optimization. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University
16 Kroo, I.M. 1997. MDO for large-scale design, In: N.M. Alexandrov and M.Y.Hussaini(ed.). Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State of the Art, SIAM, 22-44
17 Braun, R.D., A.A. Moore and I.M. Kroo. 1996. Use of the collaborative optimization architecture for launch vehicle design. Proc. 6th AIAA/USAF/NASN/ISSMO Symp. on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA Paper, 96-4018, 306-318
18 Carlton, J.S. 1944. Marine propellers and propulsion, Oxford, I.K. : Butterworth-Heinemann
19 Harvald, S.A. 1983. Resistance and Propulsion of Ships. John Wiley & Sons
20 Neu, W.L., W.H. Mason, S. Ni, Z. Lin, A. Dasgupta and Y. Chen. 2000. A multidisciplinary design optimization scheme for containerships. Proc. 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symp. on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA-2000-4791