Browse > Article

Matched Field Processing: Ocean Experimental Data Analysis Using Feature Extraction Method  

Kim Kyung Seop (Dept. of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University)
Seong Woo Jae (Dept. of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University)
Song Hee Chun (Marine Physical Lab., UCSD)
Abstract
Environmental mismatch has been one of important issues discussed in matched field processing for underwater source detection problem. To overcome this mismatch many algorithms professing robustness have been suggested. Feature extraction method (FEM) [Seong and Byun, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 27(3), 642-652 (2002)] is one of robust matched field processing algorithms, which is based on the eigenvector estimation. Excluding eigenvectors of replica covariance matrix corresponding to large eigenvalues and forming an incoherent subspace of the replica field, the processor is formulated similarly to MUSIC algorithm. In this paper, by using the ocean experimental data, processing results of FEM and MVDR with white noise constraint (WNC) are presented for two levels of multi-tone source. Analysis of eigen-space of CSDM and FEM performance are also presented.
Keywords
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 A. Tolstoy, Matched Field Processing for Underwater Acoustics, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993)
2 H. Schmidt, A. B. Baggeroer, W. A. Kuperman, and E. K. Scheer, 'Environmentally tolerant beamforming for high-resolution matched field processing: Deterministic mismatch,' J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 88 (4), 1851-1862, 1990   DOI
3 W. Seong and S. Byun, 'Robust matched field processing algorithm based on feature extraction,' IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 27 (3), 642-652, July 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
4 E. K. Westwood, ORCA version 1.0 user's guide, Applied Research Laboratory, (Univ. of Texas, 1998)
5 SR-113, H. Schmidt, SAFARI: Seismo-Acoustic Fast field Algorithm for Range-Independent environments, User's Guide, (SACLANT Undersea Research Center, La Spezia, Italy, 1987)
6 P. Hursky, W. S. Hodgkiss, and W. A. Kuperman, 'Matched field processing with data-derived modes,' J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 109 (4), 1355-1366, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
7 H. Cox, R. M. Zeskind, and M. M. Owen, 'Robust adaptive beamforming,' IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. ASSP-35 (10), 1365-1376, Oct. 1987
8 A. B. Baggeroer, W. A. Kuperman, and P. N. Mikhalevsky, 'An overview of matched field methods in ocean acoustics,' IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 18, 401-423, Oct. 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
9 R. A. Gramann, ABF algorithm implemented at ARL:UT, Applied Research Laboratory, (Univ. of Texas, May 1992)
10 A. M. Richardson and L. W. Nolte, 'A posteriori probability source localization in an uncertain sound speed, deep ocean environment,' J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 89 (5), 2280-2284, 1991   DOI
11 J. A. Shorey, L. W. Nolte, and J. L. Krolik, 'Computationally efficient Monte Carlo estimation algorithms for matched field processing in uncertain ocean environments,' J. Comput. Acoust. 2 (3), 285-314, 1994   DOI