Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2021.04.005

The Factors Affecting Unsafe Behaviors of Iranian Workers: A Qualitative Study Based on Grounded Theory  

Malakoutikhah, Mahdi (Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences)
Jahangiri, Mehdi (Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Research Center for Health Sciences, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences)
Alimohammadlou, Moslem (Department of Management, Faculty of Economic, Management and Social Science, Shiraz University)
Faghihi, Seyed Aliakbar (School of Medicine, Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences)
Kamalinia, Mojtaba (Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences)
Publication Information
Safety and Health at Work / v.12, no.3, 2021 , pp. 339-345 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Some researchers state that they are not yet able to provide a deep understanding of the underlying causes of unsafe behaviors (UBs). Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the attitudes and experiences of Iranian workers of UBs. Methods: This present study was conducted in 35 industries using a semistructured interview based on grounded theory. Forty participants were interviewed, including 13 industrial safety and health experts and 27 workers and supervisors. The analysis of the present study consisted of a three-step coding process including open, axial, and selective coding. Results: The results showed that the factors affecting UBs could be classified into three categories: organizational, individual, and socioeconomic factors. Organizational factors were divided into 6 parts: procedure and environmental conditions, communications, monitoring, organizational safety culture, resource allocation, and human resources. Socioeconomic factors had three subcategories: community safety culture, type of organizational ownership, and economic problems. Finally, the individual factors were classified into two categories of personality traits and individual competence. Conclusion: The results showed that organizational factors were the most categorized, and it is estimated that this factor has a more important role in the UBs. Of course, to better understand the close relationship between these factors and find the weight and importance of each factor, it needs to measure it with multicriteria decision systems.
Keywords
Grounded theory; Individual factors; Organizational factors; Socio-economic factors; Unsafe behaviors;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 DeNorre B. 8.6% of workers in the EU experienced work related health problems. Eurosta; 2009.
2 Malakoutikhah M, Rabiei H, Hassanipour S, Jahangiri M. The prevalence of unsafe behaviors in Iranian workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iranian J Public Health 2021;50(2):257.
3 Starks H, Brown Trinidad S. Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Res 2007;17(10):1372-80.   DOI
4 Mullen J. Investigating factors that influence individual safety behavior at work. J Saf Res 2004;35(3):275-85.   DOI
5 Petersen D. Safety management: a human approach. Amer Society of Safety Engineers; 2001.
6 Dababneh A, Fouad RH, Majeed AJH. Assessment of occupational safety and health performance indicators for Jordan. J Fund Appl Sci 2018;10:162-9.
7 Arghami S, Pouya Kian M, Mohammadfam I. Effects of safety signs on the modification of unsafe behaviours. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2009;17(68):93-8.
8 Chi S, Han S, Kim DY. Relationship between unsafe working conditions and workers' behavior and impact of working conditions on injury severity in US construction industry. J Constr Eng Manage 2013;139(7):826-38.   DOI
9 Seo D-C. An explicative model of unsafe work behavior. Saf Sci 2005;43(3):187-211.   DOI
10 Golmohammadi R, Damyar N, Mohammadfam I, Fardmal J. Evaluation of the relation between noise exposure and occupational stress with unsafe acts and accidents in city bus drivers. Iran Occup Health 2014;11(1).
11 Hashemi Nejad N, Mohammad Fam I, Jafari Nodoshan R, Dortaj Rabori E, Kakaei H. Assessment of unsafe behavior types by safety behavior sampling method in oil refinery workers in 2009 and suggestions for control. Occup Med Quarterly J 2012;4(1):25-33.
12 Choudhry RM, Fang D. Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: investigating factors on construction sites. Saf Sci 2008;46(4):566-84.   DOI
13 Draucker CB, Martsolf DS, Ross R, Rusk TB. Theoretical sampling and category development in grounded theory. Qualitative Health Res 2007;17(8):1137-48.   DOI
14 Shin M, Lee H-S, Park M, Moon M, Han S. A system dynamics approach for modeling construction workers' safety attitudes and behaviors. Accident Analysis Prevention 2014;68:95-105.   DOI
15 Mason M, editor. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research; 2010.
16 Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications; 2014.
17 Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications; 1990.
18 Alruqi WM, Hallowell MR, Techera U. Safety climate dimensions and their relationship to construction safety performance: a meta-analytic review. Saf Sci 2018;109:165-73.   DOI
19 Beus JM, Dhanani LY, McCord MA. A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: addressing unanswered questions. J Appl Psychol 2015;100(2):481.   DOI
20 Sawacha E, Naoum S, Fong D. Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites. Inter J Pro Manage 1999;17(5):309-15.   DOI
21 Clarke S. An integrative model of safety climate: linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta-analysis. J Occup Org Psychol 2010;83(3):553-78.   DOI
22 Yu K, Cao Q, Xie C, Qu N, Zhou L. Analysis of intervention strategies for coal miners' unsafe behaviors based on analytic network process and system dynamics. Saf Sci 2019;118:145-57.   DOI
23 Hinze J, Harrison C. Safety programs in large construction firms. J Constr Division 1981;107(3):455-67.   DOI
24 Asadi Z, Akbari H, Ghiyasi S, Dehdashti A, Kashani M. Survey of unsafe acts and its influencing factors in metal smelting industry workers in Kashan in 2016. Iran Occup Health 2018;15(1):55-64.
25 Khosravi Y, Asilian-Mahabadi H, Hajizadeh E, Hassanzadeh-Rangi N, Bastani H, Behzadan AH. Factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents on construction sites: a review. Inter J Occup Saf Ergonomics 2014;20(1):111-25.   DOI
26 Fassinger RE. Paradigms, praxis, problems, and promise: grounded theory in counseling psychology research. J Counseling Psychol 2005;52(2):156.   DOI
27 Darvishi E, Maleki A, Dehestaniathar S, Ebrahemzadih M. Effect of STOP Technique on safety climate in a construction company. J Res Health Sci 2015;15(2):109-12.
28 Seo H-C, Lee Y-S, Kim J-J, Jee N-Y. Analyzing safety behaviors of temporary construction workers using structural equation modeling. Saf Sci 2015;77:160-8.   DOI
29 Strauss A, Corbin JM. Grounded theory in practice. Sage; 1997.
30 Van Manen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Routledge; 2016.
31 Melia JL, Mearns K, Silva SA, Lima ML. Safety climate responses and the perceived risk of accidents in the construction industry. Saf Sci 2008;46(6):949-58.   DOI
32 Man S, Chan AH, Wong H. Risk-taking behaviors of Hong Kong construction Workers-A thematic study. Safety Sci 2017;98:25-36.   DOI
33 Cutcliffe JR. Methodological issues in grounded theory. J Adv Nursing 2000;31(6):1476-84.   DOI
34 Barkhordari A, Malmir B, Malakoutikhah M. An analysis of individual and social factors affecting occupational accidents. Saf Health Work 2019;10(2):205-12.   DOI
35 Oliver A, Cheyne A, Tomas JM, Cox S. The effects of organizational and individual factors on occupational accidents. J Occup Org Psychol 2002;75(4):473-88.   DOI
36 Torner M, Pousette A. Safety in constructionea comprehensive description of the characteristics of high safety standards in construction work, from the combined perspective of supervisors and experienced workers. J Saf Res 2009;40(6):399-409.   DOI
37 Guldenmund FW. The use of questionnaires in safety culture research-an evaluation. Saf Sci 2007;45(6):723-43.   DOI
38 Fang D, Chen Y, Wong L. Safety climate in construction industry: a case study in Hong Kong. J Constr Eng Manage 2006;132(6):573-84.   DOI