Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2016.04.006

An Investigation of Health and Safety Measures in a Hydroelectric Power Plant  

Acakpovi, Amevi (Electrical/Electronic Department, Accra Polytechnic)
Dzamikumah, Lucky (Open University of Malaysia/Accra Institute of Technology)
Publication Information
Safety and Health at Work / v.7, no.4, 2016 , pp. 331-339 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Occupational risk management is known as a catalyst in generating superior returns for all stakeholders on a sustainable basis. A number of companies in Ghana implemented health and safety measures adopted from international companies to ensure the safety of their employees. However, there exist great threats to employees' safety in these companies. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the level of compliance of Occupational Health and Safety management systems and standards set by international and local legislation in power producing companies in Ghana. Methods: The methodology is conducted by administering questionnaires and in-depth interviews as measuring instruments. A random sampling technique was applied to 60 respondents; only 50 respondents returned their responses. The questionnaire was developed from a literature review and contained questions and items relevant to the initial research problem. A factor analysis was also carried out to investigate the influence of some variables on safety in general. Results: Results showed that the significant factors that influence the safety of employees at the hydroelectric power plant stations are: lack of training and supervision, non-observance of safe work procedures, lack of management commitment, and lack of periodical check on machine operations. The study pointed out the safety loopholes and therefore helped improve the health and safety measures of employees in the selected company by providing effective recommendations. Conclusion: The implementation of the proposed recommendations in this paper, would lead to the prevention of work-related injuries and illnesses of employees as well as property damage and incidents in hydroelectric power plants. The recommendations may equally be considered as benchmark for the Safety and Health Management System with international standards.
Keywords
health and safety; prevention of injuries; risk management; safety standard; work musculoskeletal disorder;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Quinlan M, Bohle P, Lamm F. Managing occupational health and safety: a multidisciplinary approach. 3rd ed. South Yarra (Australia): Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. 704 p.
2 Dawson P, Zanko M. Social innovation at work: sustainable OHS in HRM. Prahran (Australia): Tilde University Press; 2011. p. 82-9.
3 Nichols T, Walters D, Tasiran AC. Trade unions, industrial mediation and industrial safety. Evidence from the UK. J Ind Relat 2007;49:211-25.   DOI
4 Hirtenlehner ZT. Risk management, principles, and guidelines. Germany: Klaus Hirtenlehner; 2012. Report No.: ONORM ISO 31000; 2012. 11 p.
5 Gwandure C, Thatcher A. The impact of voluntary withdrawal from antiepileptic medication on job performance and workplace safety. Ergon S Afr 2006;18:30-43.
6 Baer M, Frese M. Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovation and firm performance. J Organ Behav 2002;11:961-86.
7 Gillen M, Baltz D, Gassel M, Kirsch L, Vaccaro D. Perceived safety climate job demand and worker support among union and nonunion injured construction workers. J Saf Res 2002;11:33-51.
8 Valent F, McGwin G, Bovenzi M, Barbone F. Fatal work-related inhalation of harmful substances in the United States. Chest 2002;121:969-75.   DOI
9 Hatch-Maillette MA, Scalora MJ. Gender, sexual harassment, workplace violence, and risk assessment: Convergence around psychiatric staff's perceptions of personal safety. Aggress Violent Beh 2002;7:271-91.   DOI
10 Profumo A, Spini G, Cucca L, Pesavento M. Determination of inorganic nickel compounds in the particulate matter of emissions and workplace air by selective sequential dissolutions. Talanta 2003;61:465-72.   DOI
11 Mehta PK, Burrows RW. Building durable structures in the 21st century. Concr Int 2001;23:57-63.
12 Naymushin I. Russian dam disaster kills 10, scores missing [Internet]. Reuters. 2009 [cited 2009 Aug 17]. Available from: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLH339111._CH_.2400.
13 Tan GA, Fitzgerald MCB. Chemical-biological-radiological (CBR) response: a template for hospital emergency departments. Med J Aust 2002;177:196-9.
14 Henshaw JL, Gaffney SH, Madl AK, Paustenback D. The employer's responsibility to maintain a safe and healthful work environment: an historical review of societal expectations and industrial practices. Employ Respons Rights J 2007;19:173-92.   DOI
15 Mearns K, Whittaker MS, Flin R. Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments. Saf Sci 2002;41:641-80.
16 Ehasz JL, Paul K. The 2005 Upper Taum Sauk Dam Failure: A Case History [Internet]. Missouri University of Science & Technology. 2005 [cited 2005 Dec 14]. Available from: http://www.bpa.gov/power/PG/NW-HydroOperators-Forum/Materials/CaseStudyT-Sauk_Ehasz-Paul.pdf.
17 Bennet D. Health and safety management systems. J Oper Manag 2002;14:157-71.
18 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Project Dam Breach Incident [Internet]. Taum Sauk (Missouri); 2006 [cited 2006 Apr 28]. Report No. P2277. Available from: http://www.ferc.gov/industries/hydropower/safety/projects/taum-sauk/staff-rpt.asp.
19 Theophilus E. Uttarakhand Floods of June 2013: Curtain Raiser on the events at NHPC's 280 MW Dhauliganga HEP [Internet]. South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People. 2013 [cited 2013 Sep 27]. Available from: http://sandrp.in/CurtainRaiserontheeventsatNHPCs280MWDhauligangaHEP.pdf.
20 Antonsen S. Safety culture assessment: A mission impossible? J Conting Crisis Man 2009;17:242-54.   DOI
21 Child D. The essentials of factor analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group; 2006. 192p.