Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.803

Radiological Report of Pilot Study for the Korean Lung Cancer Screening (K-LUCAS) Project: Feasibility of Implementing Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System  

Lee, Ji Won (Department of Radiology, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital)
Kim, Hyae Young (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center)
Goo, Jin Mo (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Kim, Eun Young (Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center)
Lee, Soo Jung (Department of Radiology, Chungbuk National University Hospital)
Kim, Tae Jung (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Kim, Yeol (Cancer Early Detection Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center)
Lim, Juntae (Cancer Early Detection Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.19, no.4, 2018 , pp. 803-808 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: To report the radiological results of a pilot study for the Korean Lung Cancer Screening project conducted to evaluate the feasibility of lung cancer screening using low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) in Korea. Materials and Methods: The National Cancer Center and three regional cancer centers participated in this study. Asymptomatic current or ex-smokers aged 55-74 years with a smoking history of at least 30 pack-years who had used tobacco within the last 15 years were considered eligible. In total, 256 participants underwent LDCT November 2016 through March 2017. The American College of Radiology Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) was used to categorize the LDCT findings. Results: In total, 57%, 35.5%, 3.9%, and 3.5% participants belonged to Lung-RADS categories 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Accordingly, 7.4% participants exhibited positive findings (category 3 or 4). Lung cancer was diagnosed in one participant (stage IA, small cell lung cancer). Other LDCT findings included pulmonary emphysema (32.8%), coronary artery calcification (30.9%), old pulmonary tuberculosis (11.7%), bronchiectasis (12.9%), interstitial lung disease with a usual interstitial pneumonia pattern (1.2%), and pleural effusion (0.8%). Conclusion: Even though the size of our study population was small, the positive rate of 7.4% was like or lower than those in other lung cancer screening studies. Early lung cancer was detected using LDCT screening in one participant. Lung-RADS may be applicable to participants in Korea, where pulmonary tuberculosis is endemic.
Keywords
Lung cancer; Screening; Low dose; Computed tomography; Lung-RADS;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Jung KW, Won YJ, Oh CM, Kong HJ, Lee DH, Lee KH: Community of Population-Based Regional Cancer Registries. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2014. Cancer Res Treat 2017;49:292-305   DOI
2 Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Shin A, Lee JS. Survival of korean adult cancer patients by stage at diagnosis, 2006-2010: national cancer registry study. Cancer Res Treat 2013;45:162-171   DOI
3 National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365:395-409   DOI
4 Jang SS, Sheen S, Kim HY, Yim HW, Park BY, Kim KW, et al. The Korean guideline for lung cancer screening. J Korean Med Assoc 2015;58:291-301   DOI
5 Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System. American College of Radiology. Web site. https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/Lung-Rads. Published April 28, 2014. Accessed November 1, 2016
6 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AAPM Report No. 96. The measurement, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT. Report of AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee. Web site. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_96.pdf. Published January 2008. Accessed November 1, 2016
7 Global tuberculosis report 2016. World Health Organization. Web site. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js23098en. Accessed June 3, 2017
8 Ahn MI. Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT: current issues. Cancer Res Treat 2004;36:163-166   DOI
9 Roberts HC, Patsios D, Paul NS, McGregor M, Weisbrod G, Chung T, et al. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: Canadian experience. Can Assoc Radiol J 2007;58:225-235
10 Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M, Thomas M, Lenzen H, Roos N, et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 2002;222:773-781   DOI
11 McWilliams A, Mayo J, MacDonald S, leRiche JC, Palcic B, Szabo E, et al. Lung cancer screening: a different paradigm. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168:1167-1173   DOI
12 Pinsky PF, Gierada DS, Black W, Munden R, Nath H, Aberle D, et al. Performance of Lung-RADS in the national lung screening trial: a retrospective assessment. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:485-491   DOI
13 Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP, McGuinness G, Miettinen OS, et al. Early lung cancer action project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999;354:99-105   DOI
14 Han DH, Goo JM, Chong S, Ahn MI. Are lung imaging reporting and data system categories clear to radiologists? A survey of the Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology members on ten difficult-to-Classify scenarios. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:402-407   DOI
15 Miller AT, Kruger P, Conner K, Robertson T, Rowley B, Sause W, et al. Initial outcomes of a Lung Cancer Screening Program in an integrated community health system. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:733-737   DOI
16 Lanni TB Jr, Stevens C, Farah M, Boyer A, Davis J, Welsh R, et al. Early results from the implementation of a Lung Cancer Screening Program: the Beaumont Health system experience. Am J Clin Oncol 2018;41:218-222