Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.777

Inter-Vendor and Inter-Session Reliability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Implications for Multicenter Clinical Imaging Studies  

Min, Jeeyoung (Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
Park, Mina (Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
Choi, Jin Woo (Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
Jahng, Geon-Ho (Department of Radiology, Kyunghee University)
Moon, Won-Jin (Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.19, no.4, 2018 , pp. 777-782 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the inter-vendor and inter-session reliability of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and relevant parameters. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 10 healthy subjects (5 women and 5 men; age range, 25-33 years). Each subject was scanned twice using 3T magnetic resonance scanners from three different vendors at two different sites. A voxel-wise statistical analysis of diffusion data was performed using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and radial diffusivity (RD) values were calculated for each brain voxel using FMRIB's Diffusion Toolbox. Results: A repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that there were no significant differences in FA values across the vendors or between sessions; however, there were significant differences in MD values between the vendors (p = 0.020). Although there were no significant differences in inter-session MD and inter-session/inter-vendor RD values, a significant group x factor interaction revealed differences in MD and RD values between the 1st and 2nd sessions conducted by the vendors (p = 0.004 and 0.006, respectively). Conclusion: Although FA values exhibited good inter-vendor and inter-session reliability, MD and RD values did not show consistent results. Researchers using DTI should be aware of these limitations, especially when implementing DTI in multicenter studies.
Keywords
Brain; Diffusion tensor imaging; Magnetic resonance; Reliability; Reproducibility;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Jovicich J, Marizzoni M, Bosch B, Bartres-Faz D, Arnold J, Benninghoff J, et al. Multisite longitudinal reliability of tractbased spatial statistics in diffusion tensor imaging of healthy elderly subjects. Neuroimage 2014;101:390-403   DOI
2 Lagana M, Rovaris M, Ceccarelli A, Venturelli C, Marini S, Baselli G. DTI parameter optimisation for acquisition at 1.5T: SNR analysis and clinical application. Comput Intell Neurosci 2010:254032
3 Teipel SJ, Reuter S, Stieltjes B, Acosta-Cabronero J, Ernemann U, Fellgiebel A, et al. Multicenter stability of diffusion tensor imaging measures: a European clinical and physical phantom study. Psychiatry Res 2011;194:363-371   DOI
4 Grech-Sollars M, Hales PW, Miyazaki K, Raschke F, Rodriguez D, Wilson M, et al. Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain. MR Biomed 2015;28:468-485
5 Vollmar C, O'Muircheartaigh J, Barker GJ, Symms MR, Thompson P, Kumari V, et al. Identical, but not the same: intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0T scanners. Neuroimage 2010;51:1384-1394   DOI
6 Tofts PS, Collins DJ. Multicentre imaging measurements for oncology and in the brain. Br J Radiol 2011;84 Spec No 2:S213-S226   DOI
7 Kamagata K, Shimoji K, Hori M, Nishikori A, Tsuruta K, Yoshida M, et al. Intersite reliability of diffusion tensor imaging on two 3T scanners. Magn Reson Med Sci 2015;14:227-233   DOI
8 Pagani E, Hirsch JG, Pouwels PJ, Horsfield MA, Perego E, Gass A, et al. Intercenter differences in diffusion tensor MRI acquisition. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:1458-1468   DOI
9 Fox RJ, Sakaie K, Lee JC, Debbins JP, Liu Y, Arnold DL, et al. A validation study of multicenter diffusion tensor imaging: reliability of fractional anisotropy and diffusivity values. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:695-700   DOI
10 Oppenheim C, Rodrigo S, Poupon C, Dumas de la Roque A, Naggara O, Meder JF, et al. [Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain. Clinical applications]. J Radiol 2004;85:287-296   DOI
11 Minati L, Grisoli M, Bruzzone MG. MR spectroscopy, functional MRI, and diffusion-tensor imaging in the aging brain: a conceptual review. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2007;20:3-21   DOI
12 Nucifora PG, Verma R, Lee SK, Melhem ER. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging and tractography: exploring brain microstructure and connectivity. Radiology 2007;245:367-384   DOI
13 Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Nunes RG, Clare S, et al. Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:1077-1088   DOI
14 Magnotta VA, Matsui JT, Liu D, Johnson HJ, Long JD, Bolster BD Jr, et al. Multicenter reliability of diffusion tensor imaging. Brain Connect 2012;2:345-355   DOI
15 Villemagne VL, Kim SY, Rowe CC, Iwatsubo T. Imago mundi, imago AD, imago ADNI. Alzheimers Res Ther 2014;6:62   DOI
16 Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143-155   DOI
17 Jones RG, Payne RB. Clinical investigation and statistics in laboratory medicine. London: ACB Venture Publications, 1997
18 Anderson AW. Theoretical analysis of the effects of noise on diffusion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:1174-1188   DOI
19 Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 2006;31:1487-1505   DOI
20 Smith SM, Johansen-Berg H, Jenkinson M, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Miller KL, et al. Acquisition and voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data with tract-based spatial statistics. Nat Protoc 2007;2:499-503   DOI