Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.692

Is It Better to Enter a Volume CT Dose Index Value before or after Scan Range Adjustment for Radiation Dose Optimization of Pediatric Cardiothoracic CT with Tube Current Modulation?  

Goo, Hyun Woo (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.19, no.4, 2018 , pp. 692-703 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the body size-adapted volume computed tomography (CT) dose index ($CTD_{vol}$) in pediatric cardiothoracic CT with tube current modulation is better to be entered before or after scan range adjustment for radiation dose optimization. Materials and Methods: In 83 patients, cardiothoracic CT with tube current modulation was performed with the body sizeadapted $CTDI_{vol}$ entered after (group 1, n = 42) or before (group 2, n = 41) scan range adjustment. Patient-related, radiation dose, and image quality parameters were compared and correlated between the two groups. Results: The $CTDI_{vol}$ after the CT scan in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 ($1.7{\pm}0.1mGy$ vs. $1.4{\pm}0.3mGy$; p < 0.0001). Image noise ($4.6{\pm}0.5$ Hounsfield units [HU] vs. $4.5{\pm}0.7HU$) and image quality ($1.5{\pm}0.6$ vs. $1.5{\pm}0.6$) showed no significant differences between the two (p > 0.05). In both groups, all patient-related parameters, except body density, showed positive correlations (r = 0.49-0.94; p < 0.01) with the $CTDI_{vol}$ before and after the CT scan. The $CTDI_{vol}$ after CT scan showed modest positive correlation (r = 0.49; $p{\leq}0.001$) with image noise in group 1 but no significant correlation (p > 0.05) in group 2. Conclusion: In pediatric cardiothoracic CT with tube current modulation, the $CTDI_{vol}$ entered before scan range adjustment provides a significant dose reduction (18%) with comparable image quality compared with that entered after scan range adjustment.
Keywords
Radiation dose optimization; Cardiac CT; Tube current modulation; Child; Image quality evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Greenwood TJ, Lopez-Costa RI, Rhoades PD, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Starr M, Street M, et al. CT dose optimization in pediatric radiology: a multiyear effort to preserve the benefits of imaging while reducing the risks. Radiographics 2015;35:1539-1554   DOI
2 Goo HW. CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 2012;13:1-11   DOI
3 Goo HW. State-of-the-art CT imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol 2010;11:4-18   DOI
4 Goo HW, Suh DS. The influences of tube voltage and scan direction on combined tube current modulation: a phantom study. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:833-840   DOI
5 Israel GM, Herlihy S, Rubinowitz AN, Cornfeld D, Brink J. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:140-144   DOI
6 Hui PKT, Goo HW, Du J, Ip JJK, Kanzaki S, Kim YJ, et al. Asian consortium on radiation dose of pediatric cardiac CT (ASCIREDCARD). Pediatr Radiol 2017;47:899-910   DOI
7 Toth T, Ge Z, Daly MP. The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise. Med Phys 2007;34:3093-3101   DOI
8 Goo HW, Suh DS. Tube current reduction in pediatric non-ECGgated heart CT by combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:344-351   DOI
9 Kuo F, Plaza M, Saigal G. Inappropriate arm positioning during scout image acquisition resulting in increased radiation dose while performing a chest CT. Pediatr Radiol 2012;42:508-509   DOI
10 Greess H, Lutze J, Nomayr A, Wolf H, Hothorn T, Kalender WA, et al. Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2004;14:995-999   DOI
11 Cody DD. Management of auto exposure control during pediatric computed tomography. Pediatr Radiol 2014;44 Suppl 3:427-430   DOI
12 Soderberg M. Overview, practical tips and potential pitfalls of using automatic exposure control in CT: Siemens CARE Dose 4D. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2016;169:84-91   DOI
13 Solomon JB, Li X, Samei E. Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:592-600   DOI
14 Jung YY, Goo HW. The optimal parameter for radiation dose in pediatric low dose abdominal CT: cross-sectional dimensions versus body weight. J Korean Radiol Soc 2008;58:169-175   DOI
15 Dong F, Davros W, Pozzuto J, Reid J. Optimization of kilovoltage and tube current-exposure time product based on abdominal circumference: an oval phantom study for pediatric abdominal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:670-676   DOI
16 Menke J. Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. Radiology 2005;236:565-571   DOI
17 Wang J, Duan X, Christner JA, Leng S, Yu L, McCollough CH. Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part I. Development and validation of methods using the CT image. Med Phys 2012;39:6764-6771
18 Goo HW, Allmendinger T. Combined electrocardiography- and respiratory-triggered CT of the lung to reduce respiratory misregistration artifacts between imaging slabs in freebreathing children: initial experience. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:860-866   DOI
19 Wang J, Christner JA, Duan X, Leng S, Yu L, McCollough CH. Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part II. Implementation on abdomen and thorax phantoms using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph images. Med Phys 2012;39:6772-6778
20 Goo HW. Individualized volume CT dose index determined by cross-sectional area and mean density of the body to achieve uniform image noise of contrast-enhanced pediatric chest CT obtained at variable kV levels and with combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol 2011;41:839-847   DOI
21 Kaasalainen T, Palmu K, Reijonen V, Kortesniemi M. Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:123-130   DOI
22 Larson DB, Wang LL, Podberesky DJ, Goske MJ. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model. Radiology 2013;269:167-176   DOI
23 Larson DB, Malarik RJ, Hall SM, Podberesky DJ. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part II. Process control system. Radiology 2013;269:177-185   DOI
24 Li B, Behrman RH, Norbash AM. Comparison of topogrambased body size indices for CT dose consideration and scan protocol optimization. Med Phys 2012;39:3456-3465   DOI
25 Ikuta I, Warden GI, Andriole KP, Khorasani R, Sodickson A. Estimating patient dose from x-ray tube output metrics: automated measurement of patient size from CT images enables large-scale size-specific dose estimates. Radiology 2014;270:472-480   DOI