Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1294

A New MRI Grading System for Cervical Foraminal Stenosis Based on Axial T2-Weighted Images  

Kim, Sujin (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center)
Lee, Joon Woo (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center)
Chai, Jee Won (Department of Radiology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center)
Yoo, Hye Jin (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Kang, Yusuhn (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Seo, Jiwoon (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center)
Ahn, Joong Mo (Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center)
Kang, Heung Sik (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.16, no.6, 2015 , pp. 1294-1302 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) grading system for cervical neural foraminal stenosis (NFS). Materials and Methods: Cervical NFS at bilateral C4/5, C5/6, and C6/7 was classified into the following three grades based on the T2-weighted axial images: Grade 0 = absence of NFS, with the narrowest width of the neural foramen greater than the width of the extraforaminal nerve root (EFNR); Grade 1 = the narrowest width of the neural foramen the same or less than (but more than 50% of) the width of the EFNR; Grade 2 = the width of the neural foramen the same or less than 50% of the width of the EFNR. The MRIs of 96 patients who were over 60 years old (M:F = 50:46; mean age 68.4 years; range 61-86 years) were independently analyzed by seven radiologists. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were analyzed using the percentage agreement, kappa statistics, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: For the distinction among the three individual grades at all six neural foramina, the ICC ranged from 0.68 to 0.73, indicating fair to good reproducibility. The percentage agreement ranged from 60.2% to 70.6%, and the kappa values (${\kappa}$ = 0.50-0.58) indicated fair to moderate agreement. The percentages of intraobserver agreement ranged from 85.4% to 93.8% (${\kappa}$ = 0.80-0.92), indicating near perfect agreement. Conclusion: The new MRI grading system shows sufficient interobserver and intraobserver agreement to reliably assess cervical NFS.
Keywords
Cervical spine; Neural foraminal stenosis; Severity grading system; Classification;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Wainner RS, Gill H. Diagnosis and nonoperative management of cervical radiculopathy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2000;30:728-744   DOI
2 Yousem DM, Atlas SW, Goldberg HI, Grossman RI. Degenerative narrowing of the cervical spine neural foramina: evaluation with high-resolution 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:229-236
3 Abbed KM, Coumans JV. Cervical radiculopathy: pathophysiology, presentation, and clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery 2007;60(1 Supp1 1):S28-S34
4 Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Mulopulos GP, Bundschuh C, Han JS, Bohlman H. Cervical radiculopathy: prospective evaluation with surface coil MR imaging, CT with metrizamide, and metrizamide myelography. Radiology 1986;161:753-759   DOI
5 Russell EJ. Cervical disk disease. Radiology 1990;177:313-325   DOI
6 Jahnke RW, Hart BL. Cervical stenosis, spondylosis, and herniated disc disease. Radiol Clin North Am 1991;29:777-791
7 Yousem DM, Atlas SW, Hackney DB. Cervical spine disk herniation: comparison of CT and 3DFT gradient echo MR scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:345-351   DOI
8 Ryan AG, Morrissey BM, Newcombe RG, Halpin SF, Hourihan MD. Are T1 weighted images helpful in MRI of cervical radiculopathy? Br J Radiol 2004;77:189-196   DOI
9 Bartlett RJ, Hill CR, Gardiner E. A comparison of T2 and gadolinium enhanced MRI with CT myelography in cervical radiculopathy. Br J Radiol 1998;71:11-19   DOI
10 Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Mulopulos GP, Bundschuh CV, Bohlman H. Cervical radiculopathy: value of oblique MR imaging. Radiology 1987;163:227-231   DOI
11 Shim JH, Park CK, Lee JH, Choi JW, Lee DC, Kim DH, et al. A comparison of angled sagittal MRI and conventional MRI in the diagnosis of herniated disc and stenosis in the cervical foramen. Eur Spine J 2009;18:1109-1116   DOI
12 Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee SY, Park NH, Chung EC, Rho MH, et al. A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images. Br J Radiol 2013;86:20120515   DOI
13 Park HJ, Kim SS, Han CH, Lee SY, Chung EC, Kim MS, et al. The clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for grading cervical neural foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:412-417   DOI
14 Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, An HS, Ikuta Y, Yasuda M. The anatomic relation among the nerve roots, intervertebral foramina, and intervertebral discs of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:286-291   DOI
15 Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS, Wiesel S. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:1178-1184   DOI
16 Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan A, Eck JC, Covington LA, Sartori M. The natural history of the cervical foramen in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals aged 20-60 years as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. A descriptive approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:2180-2184   DOI
17 Lee MJ, Riew KD. The prevalence cervical facet arthrosis: an osseous study in a cadveric population. Spine J 2009;9:711-714   DOI
18 Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005;85:257-268
19 Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 2003;228:303-308   DOI
20 Kang Y, Lee JW, Koh YH, Hur S, Kim SJ, Chai JW, et al. New MRI grading system for the cervical canal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:W134-W140   DOI
21 Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee YJ, Lee SY, Park NH, Choi YJ, et al. Clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for assessing central lumbar spinal stenosis. Br J Radiol 2013;86:20120180   DOI
22 Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 7th ed. Canada: Cengage Learning, 2010
23 Song KJ, Choi BW, Kim GH, Kim JR. Clinical usefulness of CTmyelogram comparing with the MRI in degenerative cervical spinal disorders: is CTM still useful for primary diagnostic tool? J Spinal Disord Tech 2009;22:353-357   DOI
24 Park MS, Moon SH, Lee HM, Kim TH, Oh JK, Lee SY, et al. Diagnostic value of oblique magnetic resonance images for evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis. Spine J 2015;15:607-611   DOI
25 Shin HY, Park JK, Park SK, Jung GS, Choi YS. Variations in Entrance of Vertebral Artery in Korean Cervical Spine: MDCTbased Analysis. Korean J Pain 2014;27:266-270   DOI
26 Bruneau M, Cornelius JF, Marneffe V, Triffaux M, George B. Anatomical variations of the V2 segment of the vertebral artery. Neurosurgery 2006;59(1 Suppl 1):ONS20-ONS24; discussion ONS20-ONS24
27 Rawal JD, Jadav HR. Anatomical study of variation of vertebral artery entering the foramen transversarium of cervical vertebrae. Natl J Med Res 2012;2:199-201
28 Kitagawa T, Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, Tamai K, Saotome K. Morphologic changes in the cervical neural foramen due to flexion and extension: in vivo imaging study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:2821-2825   DOI
29 Vitaz TW, Shields CB, Raque GH, Hushek SG, Moser R, Hoerter N, et al. Dynamic weight-bearing cervical magnetic resonance imaging: technical review and preliminary results. South Med J 2004;97:456-461   DOI
30 Jinkins JR, Dworkin JS, Damadian RV. Upright, weightbearing, dynamic-kinetic MRI of the spine: initial results. Eur Radiol 2005;15:1815-1825   DOI