Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.430

Digital Tomosynthesis for Evaluating Metastatic Lung Nodules: Nodule Visibility, Learning Curves, and Reading Times  

Lee, Kyung Hee (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center)
Goo, Jin Mo (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center)
Lee, Sang Min (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center)
Park, Chang Min (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center)
Bahn, Young Eun (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center)
Kim, Hyungjin (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center)
Song, Yong Sub (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center)
Hwang, Eui Jin (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.16, no.2, 2015 , pp. 430-439 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate nodule visibility, learning curves, and reading times for digital tomosynthesis (DT). Materials and Methods: We included 80 patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) and DT before pulmonary metastasectomy. One experienced chest radiologist annotated all visible nodules on thin-section CT scans using computeraided detection software. Two radiologists used CT as the reference standard and retrospectively graded the visibility of nodules on DT. Nodule detection performance was evaluated in four sessions of 20 cases each by six readers. After each session, readers were unblinded to the DT images by revealing the true-positive markings and were instructed to self-analyze their own misreads. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were determined. Results: Among 414 nodules on CT, 53.3% (221/414) were visible on DT. The main reason for not seeing a nodule on DT was small size (93.3%, ${\leq}5mm$). DT revealed a substantial number of malignant nodules (84.1%, 143/170). The proportion of malignant nodules among visible nodules on DT was significantly higher (64.7%, 143/221) than that on CT (41.1%, 170/414) (p < 0.001). Area under the curve (AUC) values at the initial session were > 0.8, and the average detection rate for malignant nodules was 85% (210/246). The inter-session analysis of the AUC showed no significant differences among the readers, and the detection rate for malignant nodules did not differ across sessions. A slight improvement in reading times was observed. Conclusion: Most malignant nodules > 5 mm were visible on DT. As nodule detection performance was high from the initial session, DT may be readily applicable for radiology residents and board-certified radiologists.
Keywords
Pulmonary nodules; Tomography; X-ray; Learning curve;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Monnier-Cholley L, Carrat F, Cholley BP, Tubiana JM, Arrive L. Detection of lung cancer on radiographs: receiver operating characteristic analyses of radiologists', pulmonologists', and anesthesiologists' performance. Radiology 2004;233:799-805   DOI
2 Kakeda S, Moriya J, Sato H, Aoki T, Watanabe H, Nakata H, et al. Improved detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs using a commercial computer-aided diagnosis system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:505-510   DOI
3 Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839-843   DOI
4 Goo JM. A computer-aided diagnosis for evaluating lung nodules on chest CT: the current status and perspective. Korean J Radiol 2011;12:145-155   DOI
5 Park EA, Goo JM, Lee JW, Kang CH, Lee HJ, Lee CH, et al. Efficacy of computer-aided detection system and thin-slab maximum intensity projection technique in the detection of pulmonary nodules in patients with resected metastases. Invest Radiol 2009;44:105-113   DOI
6 Quaia E, Baratella E, Cioffi V, Bregant P, Cernic S, Cuttin R, et al. The value of digital tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary lesions on chest radiography: analysis of diagnostic accuracy and confidence. Acad Radiol 2010;17:1267-1274   DOI
7 Quaia E, Baratella E, Poillucci G, Kus S, Cioffi V, Cova MA. Digital tomosynthesis as a problem-solving imaging technique to confirm or exclude potential thoracic lesions based on chest X-ray radiography. Acad Radiol 2013;20:546-553   DOI
8 Rose SL, Tidwell AL, Bujnoch LJ, Kushwaha AC, Nordmann AS, Sexton R Jr. Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:1401-1408   DOI
9 Lee G, Jeong YJ, Kim KI, Song JW, Kang DM, Kim YD, et al. Comparison of chest digital tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of asbestos-related pleuropulmonary disease. Clin Radiol 2013;68:376-382   DOI
10 Quaia E, Baratella E, Cernic S, Lorusso A, Casagrande F, Cioffi V, et al. Analysis of the impact of digital tomosynthesis on the radiological investigation of patients with suspected pulmonary lesions on chest radiography. Eur Radiol 2012;22:1912-1922   DOI
11 Terzi A, Bertolaccini L, Viti A, Comello L, Ghirardo D, Priotto R, et al. Lung cancer detection with digital chest tomosynthesis: baseline results from the observational study SOS. J Thorac Oncol 2013;8:685-692   DOI
12 Kim EY, Chung MJ, Lee HY, Koh WJ, Jung HN, Lee KS. Pulmonary mycobacterial disease: diagnostic performance of low-dose digital tomosynthesis as compared with chest radiography. Radiology 2010;257:269-277   DOI
13 Potchen EJ, Cooper TG, Sierra AE, Aben GR, Potchen MJ, Potter MG, et al. Measuring performance in chest radiography. Radiology 2000;217:456-459   DOI
14 Jung HN, Chung MJ, Koo JH, Kim HC, Lee KS. Digital tomosynthesis of the chest: utility for detection of lung metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer. Clin Radiol 2012;67:232-238   DOI
15 Dobbins JT 3rd, McAdams HP. Chest tomosynthesis: technical principles and clinical update. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:244-251   DOI
16 Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Hasegawa I, Shiomi E, Sugiura H, Abe T, et al. Fast scanning tomosynthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules: diagnostic performance compared with chest radiography, using multidetector-row computed tomography as the reference. Invest Radiol 2011;46:471-477   DOI
17 James TD, McAdams HP, Song JW, Li CM, Godfrey DJ, DeLong DM, et al. Digital tomosynthesis of the chest for lung nodule detection: interim sensitivity results from an ongoing NIH-sponsored trial. Med Phys 2008;35:2554-2557   DOI
18 Vikgren J, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A, Johnsson AA, Boijsen M, Flinck A, et al. Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases. Radiology 2008;249:1034-1041   DOI
19 Asplund S, Johnsson AA, Vikgren J, Svalkvist A, Boijsen M, Fisichella V, et al. Learning aspects and potential pitfalls regarding detection of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis and proposed related quality criteria. Acta Radiol 2011;52:503-512   DOI
20 Dachman AH, Kelly KB, Zintsmaster MP, Rana R, Khankari S, Novak JD, et al. Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonographic image interpretation by novice readers. Radiology 2008;249:167-177   DOI
21 Hock D, Ouhadi R, Materne R, Aouchria AS, Mancini I, Broussaud T, et al. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection. Radiology 2008;248:860-868   DOI
22 Fischbach F, Knollmann F, Griesshaber V, Freund T, Akkol E, Felix R. Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2378-2383   DOI
23 Kim EY, Chung MJ, Choe YH, Lee KS. Digital tomosynthesis for aortic arch calcification evaluation: performance comparison with chest radiography with CT as the reference standard. Acta Radiol 2012;53:17-22   DOI
24 Otani H, Nitta N, Ikeda M, Nagatani Y, Tanaka T, Kitahara H, et al. Flat-panel detector computed tomography imaging: observer performance in detecting pulmonary nodules in comparison with conventional chest radiography and multidetector computed tomography. J Thorac Imaging 2012;27:51-57   DOI