Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography: Comparison with Conventional Mammography and Histopathology in 152 Women |
Luczynska, Elzbieta
(Department of Radiology, Centre of Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute)
Heinze-Paluchowska, Sylwia (Department of Radiology, Centre of Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute) Dyczek, Sonia (Department of Radiology, Centre of Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute) Blecharz, Pawel (Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre of Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute) Rys, Janusz (Department of Tumour Pathology, Centre of Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute) Reinfuss, Marian (Department of Radiotherapy, Centre of Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute) |
1 | Jochelson M. Advanced imaging techniques for the detection of breast cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2012:65-69 |
2 | Burhenne HJ, Burhenne LW, Goldberg F, Hislop TG, Worth AJ, Rebbeck PM, et al. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:1067-1071; discussion 1072-1075 DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Robertson CL. A private breast imaging practice: medical audit of 25,788 screening and 1,077 diagnostic examinations. Radiology 1993;187:75-79 DOI |
4 | Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1081-1087 DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225:165-175 DOI ScienceOn |
6 | Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Cormack JB, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 2008;246:376-383 DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-1783 DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, et al. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2679-2683 |
9 | Smith A. Fundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerations. Radiol Manage 2003;25:18-24, 26-31; quiz 32-34 |
10 | Knopp MV, Giesel FL, Marcos H, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Choyke P. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12:301-308 DOI |
11 | Padhani AR, Dzik-Jurasz A. Perfusion MR imaging of extracranial tumor angiogenesis. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:41-57 DOI |
12 | Jeswani T, Padhani AR. Imaging tumour angiogenesis. Cancer Imaging 2005;5:131-138 DOI |
13 | Schäfer AO, Langer M. [MRI mammography screening in women with lobular carcinoma in situ]. Strahlenther Onkol 2012;188:716-717 DOI |
14 | Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD, Sung JS, Heerdt AS, Thornton C, Moskowitz CS, et al. Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology 2013;266:743-751 DOI |
15 | Berg WA. Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1225-1228 DOI ScienceOn |
16 | Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Muller S, Mathieu MC, Rochard F, Opolon P, et al. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:W528-W537 DOI |
17 | Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 1995;197:743-747 DOI |
18 | Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F, Fallenberg EM, Jong RA, Koomen M, et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14:R94 DOI |
19 | Puong S, Bouchevreau X, Patoureaux F, Iordache R, Muller S. Dual-energy contrast enhanced digital mammography using a new approach for breast tissue canceling. Proc SPIE 2007;6510:65102H DOI |
20 | Diekmann F, Freyer M, Diekmann S, Fallenberg EM, Fischer T, Bick U, et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 2011;78:112-121 DOI |
21 | Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001;220:13-30 DOI ScienceOn |
22 | Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996;276:33-38 DOI ScienceOn |
23 | Lewin JM, Niklason L. Advanced applications of digital mammography: tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Semin Roentgenol 2007;42:243-252 DOI ScienceOn |