Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.258

Are Spinal or Paraspinal Anatomic Markers Helpful for Vertebral Numbering and Diagnosing Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae?  

Tokgoz, Nil (Department of Radiology, Gazi University School of Medicine)
Ucar, Murat (Department of Radiology, Gazi University School of Medicine)
Erdogan, Aylin Billur (Department of Radiology, Gazi University School of Medicine)
Kilic, Koray (Department of Radiology, Gazi University School of Medicine)
Ozcan, Cahide (Department of Radiology, Gazi University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.15, no.2, 2014 , pp. 258-266 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the value of spinal and paraspinal anatomic markers in both the diagnosis of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTVs) and identification of vertebral levels on lumbar MRI. Materials and Methods: Lumbar MRI from 1049 adult patients were studied. By comparing with the whole-spine localizer, the diagnostic errors in numbering vertebral segments on lumbar MRI were evaluated. The morphology of S1-2 disc, L5 and S1 body, and lumbar spinous processes (SPs) were evaluated by using sagittal MRI. The positions of right renal artery (RRA), superior mesenteric artery, aortic bifurcation (AB) and conus medullaris (CM) were described. Results: The diagnostic error for evaluation of vertebral segmentation on lumbar MRI alone was 14.1%. In lumbarization, all patients revealed a well-formed S1-2 disc with squared S1 body. A rhombus-shaped L5 body in sacralization and a rectangular-shaped S1 body in lumbarization were found. The L3 had the longest SP. The most common sites of spinal and paraspinal structures were: RRA at L1 body (53.6%) and L1-2 disc (34.1%), superior mesenteric artery at L1 body (55.1%) and T12-L1 disc (31.6%), and AB at L4 body (71.1%). CM had variable locations, changing from the T12-L1 disc to L2 body. They were located at higher sacralization and lower lumbarization. Conclusion: The spinal morphologic features and locations of the spinal and paraspinal structures on lumbar MRI are not completely reliable for the diagnosis of LSTVs and identification on the vertebral levels.
Keywords
Spine; Lumbosacral vertebrae; Transitional vertebrae; MRI;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee CH, Park CM, Kim KA, Hong SJ, Seol HY, Kim BH, et al. Identification and prediction of transitional vertebrae on imaging studies: anatomical significance of paraspinal structures. Clin Anat 2007;20:905-914   DOI
2 Hughes RJ, Saifuddin A. Numbering of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae on MRI: role of the iliolumbar ligaments. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:W59-W65   DOI
3 Hughes RJ, Saifuddin A. Imaging of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae. Clin Radiol 2004;59:984-991   DOI
4 Konin GP, Walz DM. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: classification, imaging findings, and clinical relevance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1778-1786   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Carrino JA, Campbell PD Jr, Lin DC, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Flanders AE, et al. Effect of spinal segment variants on numbering vertebral levels at lumbar MR imaging. Radiology 2011;259:196-202   DOI
6 Lee CH, Seo BK, Choi YC, Shin HJ, Park JH, Jeon HJ, et al. Using MRI to evaluate anatomic significance of aortic bifurcation, right renal artery, and conus medullaris when locating lumbar vertebral segments. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1295-1300   DOI
7 Peh WC, Siu TH, Chan JH. Determining the lumbar vertebral segments on magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:1852-1855   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DP. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984;9:493-495   DOI   ScienceOn
9 MacGibbon B, Farfan HF. A radiologic survey of various configurations of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1979;4:258-266   DOI
10 Hahn PY, Strobel JJ, Hahn FJ. Verification of lumbosacral segments on MR images: identification of transitional vertebrae. Radiology 1992;182:580-581   DOI
11 Malanga GA, Cooke PM. Segmental anomaly leading to wrong level disc surgery in cauda equina syndrome. Pain Physician 2004;7:107-110
12 O'Driscoll CM, Irwin A, Saifuddin A. Variations in morphology of the lumbosacral junction on sagittal MRI: correlation with plain radiography. Skeletal Radiol 1996;25:225-230   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Byun WM, Kim JW, Lee JK. Differentiation between symptomatic and asymptomatic extraforaminal stenosis in lumbosacral transitional vertebra: role of three-dimensional magnetic resonance lumbosacral radiculography. Korean J Radiol 2012;13:403-411   DOI
14 Wigh RE, Anthony HF Jr. Transitional lumbosacral discs. probability of herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1981;6:168-171   DOI
15 Bron JL, van Royen BJ, Wuisman PI. The clinical significance of lumbosacral transitional anomalies. Acta Orthop Belg 2007;73:687-695
16 Wigh RE. The thoracolumbar and lumbosacral transitional junctions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1980;5:215-222   DOI
17 Wigh RE. Phylogeny and the herniated disc. South Med J 1979;72:1138-1143   DOI
18 Sobottke R, Koy T, Rollinghoff M, Siewe J, Kreitz T, Muller D, et al. Computed tomography measurements of the lumbar spinous processes and interspinous space. Surg Radiol Anat 2010;32:731-738   DOI
19 Tan SH, Teo EC, Chua H. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of lumbar vertebrae in Singaporean Asians. Eur Spine J 2002;11:152-158   DOI
20 Ralston MD, Dykes TA, Applebaum BI. Verification of lumbar vertebral bodies. Radiology 1992;185:615-616   DOI
21 Healy JC, Borley NR, Mundy AR, Collins P, Wigley C. True pelvis, pelvic floor and perineum. In: Standring S, ed. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 39th ed. New York: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2005:1360
22 Chithriki M, Jaibaji M, Steele RD. The anatomical relationship of the aortic bifurcation to the lumbar vertebrae: a MRI study. Surg Radiol Anat 2002;24:308-312   DOI
23 Kumar S, Neyaz Z, Gupta A. The utility of 64 channel multidetector CT angiography for evaluating the renal vascular anatomy and possible variations: a pictorial essay. Korean J Radiol 2010;11:346-354   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Williams A, Newell RLM, Collins P. Macroscopic anatomy of the spinal cord and spinal nerves. In: Standring S, ed. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 39th ed. New York: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2005:775