Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.226

Differentiating between Adenomyomatosis and Gallbladder Cancer: Revisiting a Comparative Study of High-Resolution Ultrasound, Multidetector CT, and MR Imaging  

Bang, Sang Heum (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital)
Lee, Jae Young (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital)
Woo, Hyunsik (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital)
Joo, Ijin (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital)
Lee, Eun Sun (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital)
Han, Joon Koo (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital)
Choi, Byung Ihn (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.15, no.2, 2014 , pp. 226-234 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) with contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) to differentiate between adenomyomatosis (ADM) and gallbladder cancer (GBCA). Materials and Methods: Forty patients with surgically proven ADM (n = 13) or GBCA at stage T2 or lower (n = 27) who previously underwent preoperative HRUS, contrast-enhanced CT, and contrast-enhanced MRI with MRCP were retrospectively included in this study. According to the well-known diagnostic criteria, two reviewers independently analyzed the images from each modality separately with a five-point confidence scale. The interobserver agreement was calculated using weighted ${\kappa}$ statistics. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each modality when scores of 1 or 2 indicated ADM. Results: The interobserver agreement between the two reviewers was good to excellent. The mean Az values for HRUS, multidetector CT (MDCT), and MRI were 0.959, 0.898, and 0.935, respectively, without any statistically significant differences between any of the modalities (p > 0.05). The mean sensitivity of MRI with MRCP (80.8%) was significantly higher than that of MDCT (50.0%) (p = 0.0215). However, the mean sensitivity of MRI with MRCP (80.8%) was not significantly different from that of HRUS (73.1%) (p > 0.05). The mean specificities and accuracies among the three modalities were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Conclusion: High-resolution ultrasound and MRI with MRCP have comparable sensitivity and accuracy and MDCT has the lowest sensitivity and accuracy for the differentiation of ADM and GBCA.
Keywords
Gallbladder; Adenomyomatosis; Gallbladder cancer; High-resolution ultrasound; CT; MRI;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Williams I, Slavin G, Cox A, Simpson P, de Lacey G. Diverticular disease (adenomyomatosis) of the gallbladder: a radiological-pathological survey. Br J Radiol 1986;59:29-34   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Jutras JA. Hyperplastic cholecystoses; Hickey lecture, 1960. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1960;83:795-827
3 Colquhoun J. Adenomyomatosis of the gall-bladder (intramural diverticulosis). Br J Radiol 1961;34:101-112   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Fotopoulos JP, Crampton AR. Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Med Clin North Am 1964;48:9-36   DOI
5 Gerard PS, Berman D, Zafaranloo S. CT and ultrasound of gallbladder adenomyomatosis mimicking carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:490-491
6 Ching BH, Yeh BM, Westphalen AC, Joe BN, Qayyum A, Coakley FV. CT differentiation of adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:62-66   DOI
7 Yen CL, Jeng CM, Yang SS. The benefits of comparing conventional sonography, real-time spatial compound sonography, tissue harmonic sonography, and tissue harmonic compound sonography of hepatic lesions. Clin Imaging 2008;32:11-15   DOI
8 Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Aibe H, Shinozaki K, Kuroiwa T, Irie H, et al. Radiologic diagnosis of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder: comparative study among MRI, helical CT, and transabdominal US. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:843-850   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Oktar SO, Yucel C, Ozdemir H, Uluturk A, Isik S. Comparison of conventional sonography, real-time compound sonography, tissue harmonic sonography, and tissue harmonic compound sonography of abdominal and pelvic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1341-1347   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Dahl JJ, Soo MS, Trahey GE. Clinical evaluation of combined spatial compounding and adaptive imaging in breast tissue. Ultrason Imaging 2004;26:203-216   DOI
11 Jang JY, Kim SW, Lee SE, Hwang DW, Kim EJ, Lee JY, et al. Differential diagnostic and staging accuracies of high resolution ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography, and multidetector computed tomography for gallbladder polypoid lesions and gallbladder cancer. Ann Surg 2009;250:943-949   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Yoon SH, Lee JM, So YH, Hong SH, Kim SJ, Han JK, et al. Multiphasic MDCT enhancement pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma smaller than 3 cm in diameter: tumor size and cellular differentiation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:W482-W489   DOI
13 Rice J, Sauerbrei EE, Semogas P, Cooperberg PL, Burhenne HJ. Sonographic appearance of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. J Clin Ultrasound 1981;9:336-337   DOI
14 Raghavendra BN, Subramanyam BR, Balthazar EJ, Horii SC, Megibow AJ, Hilton S. Sonography of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1983;146:747-752   DOI
15 Clouston JE, Thorpe RJ. Case report--CT findings in adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Australas Radiol 1991;35:86-87   DOI
16 Brambs HJ, Wrazidlo W, Schilling H. [The sonographic image of gallbladder adenomyomatosis]. Rofo 1990;153:633-636   DOI
17 Hwang JI, Chou YH, Tsay SH, Chiang JH, Chang CY, Boland GW, et al. Radiologic and pathologic correlation of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Abdom Imaging 1998;23:73-77   DOI
18 Boscak AR, Al-Hawary M, Ramsburgh SR. Best cases from the AFIP: adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Radiographics 2006;26:941-946   DOI
19 Chao C, Hsiao HC, Wu CS, Wang KC. Computed tomographic finding in adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. J Formos Med Assoc 1992;91:467-469
20 Stunell H, Buckley O, Geoghegan T, O'Brien J, Ward E, Torreggiani W. Imaging of adenomyomatosis of the gall bladder. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2008;52:109-117   DOI
21 Levy AD, Murakata LA, Rohrmann CA Jr. Gallbladder carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2001;21:295-314; questionnaire, 549-555   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame T, Yamamoto H, Urata J, Takahashi M. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:1297-1303   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Jimi M, Kuroiwa T, Hanada K, Irie H, et al. MR diagnosis of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder and differentiation from gallbladder carcinoma: importance of showing Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1535-1540   DOI
24 Haradome H, Ichikawa T, Sou H, Yoshikawa T, Nakamura A, Araki T, et al. The pearl necklace sign: an imaging sign of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder at MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 2003;227:80-88   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Liasis N, Klonaris C, Katsargyris A, Georgopoulos S, Labropoulos N, Tsigris C, et al. The use of Speckle Reduction Imaging (SRI) Ultrasound in the characterization of carotid artery plaques. Eur J Radiol 2008;65:427-433   DOI
26 Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989;24:234-245   DOI
27 Gore RM, Yaghmai V, Newmark GM, Berlin JW, Miller FH. Imaging benign and malignant disease of the gallbladder. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:1307-1323, vi   DOI
28 Lee JY, Choi BI, Han JK, Lee JM, Kim SH, Choi JY, et al. High resolution ultrasonographic evaluation of the gallbladder: value of advanced imaging techniques. J Korean Soc Ultrasound Med 2005;24:169-175   DOI
29 Oria HE. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of gallbladder disease in clinically severe obesity. Obes Surg 1998;8:444-451   DOI