Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.210

Noninvasive Assessment of Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Viral Infection Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography  

Lee, Jeong Eun (Department of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital)
Lee, Jeong Min (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Lee, Kyung Bun (Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital)
Yoon, Jeong Hee (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Shin, Cheong Il (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Han, Joon Koo (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Choi, Byung Ihn (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.15, no.2, 2014 , pp. 210-217 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for staging hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Materials and Methods: Patients with chronic HBV infection who were suspected of having focal or diffuse liver diseases (n = 195) and living donor candidates (n = 166) underwent MRE as part of the routine liver MRI examination. We measured liver stiffness (LS) values on quantitative shear stiffness maps. The technical success rate of MRE was then determined. Liver cell necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis were assessed using histopathologic examinations as the reference. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) were calculated in order to predict the liver fibrosis stage. Results: The technical success rate of MRE was 92.5% (334/361). The causes of technical failure were poor wave propagation (n = 12), severe respiratory motion (n = 3), or the presence of iron deposits in the liver (n = 12). The mean LS values, as measured by MRE, increased significantly along with an increase in the fibrosis stage (r = 0.901, p < 0.001); however, the mean LS values did not increase significantly along with the degree of necroinflammatory activity. The cutoff values of LS for ${\geq}F1$, ${\geq}F2$, ${\geq}F3$, and F4 were 2.45 kPa, 2.69 kPa, 3.0 kPa, and 3.94 kPa, respectively, and with Az values of 0.987-0.988. Conclusion: MRE has a high technical success rate and excellent diagnostic accuracy for staging hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic HBV infection.
Keywords
Liver cirrhosis; Hepatitis B; MRE; Magnetic resonance imaging; Liver; Hepatic fibrosis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bensamoun SF, Wang L, Robert L, Charleux F, Latrive JP, Ho Ba Tho MC. Measurement of liver stiffness with two imaging techniques: magnetic resonance elastography and ultrasound elastometry. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:1287-1292   DOI
2 Taouli B, Ehman RL, Reeder SB. Advanced MRI methods for assessment of chronic liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:14-27   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Fung J, Lai CL, Seto WK, Yuen MF. The use of transient elastography in the management of chronic hepatitis B. Hepatol Int 2011 [Epub ahead of print]
4 Han KH, Yoon KT. New diagnostic method for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Intervirology 2008;51 Suppl 1:11-16   DOI   ScienceOn
5 McGill DB, Rakela J, Zinsmeister AR, Ott BJ. A 21-year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology 1990;99:1396-1400   DOI
6 Van Thiel DH, Gavaler JS, Wright H, Tzakis A. Liver biopsy. Its safety and complications as seen at a liver transplant center. Transplantation 1993;55:1087-1090   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Castera L, Negre I, Samii K, Buffet C. Pain experienced during percutaneous liver biopsy. Hepatology 1999;30:1529-1530   DOI
8 Choi YR, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Han JK, Choi BI. Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and gadoxetate disodiumenhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of hepatic fibrosis. Invest Radiol 2013;48:607-613   DOI
9 Annet L, Peeters F, Abarca-Quinones J, Leclercq I, Moulin P, Van Beers BE. Assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in liver fibrosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:122-128   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Huwart L, Sempoux C, Salameh N, Jamart J, Annet L, Sinkus R, et al. Liver fibrosis: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography versus aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index. Radiology 2007;245:458-466   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Fraquelli M, Rigamonti C, Casazza G, Conte D, Donato MF, Ronchi G, et al. Reproducibility of transient elastography in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut 2007;56:968-973   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Friedrich-Rust M, Nierhoff J, Lupsor M, Sporea I, Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Strobel D, et al. Performance of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis: a pooled meta-analysis. J Viral Hepat 2012;19:e212-e219   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Grimm RC, Rossman PJ, et al. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:1207-1213.e2   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Rouviere O, Yin M, Dresner MA, Rossman PJ, Burgart LJ, Fidler JL, et al. MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results. Radiology 2006;240:440-448   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Lee YJ, Lee JM, Lee JE, Lee KB, Lee ES, Yoon JH, et al. MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: Reproducibility of the examination and reproducibility and repeatability of the liver stiffness value measurement. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013 [Epub ahead of print]
16 Ziol M, Handra-Luca A, Kettaneh A, Christidis C, Mal F, Kazemi F, et al. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2005;41:48-54   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Glockner JF, Takahashi N, Araoz PA, Talwalkar JA, et al. MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1534-1540   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Kim SU, Han KH, Ahn SH. Transient elastography in chronic hepatitis B: an Asian perspective. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:5173-5180   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Pinzani M, Rombouts K, Colagrande S. Fibrosis in chronic liver diseases: diagnosis and management. J Hepatol 2005;42 Suppl:S22-S36   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Castera L, Forns X, Alberti A. Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis using transient elastography. J Hepatol 2008;48:835-847   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Kim BH, Lee JM, Lee YJ, Lee KB, Suh KS, Han JK, et al. MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: experience from a tertiary center in Asia. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:1110-1116   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Manduca A, Oliphant TE, Dresner MA, Mahowald JL, Kruse SA, Amromin E, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Med Image Anal 2001;5:237-254   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The French METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology 1994;20(1 Pt 1):15-20   DOI
24 Yoon JH, Lee JM, Woo HS, Yu MH, Joo I, Lee ES, et al. Staging of hepatic fibrosis: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and shear wave elastography in the same individuals. Korean J Radiol 2013;14:202-212   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Dzyubak B, Glaser K, Yin M, Talwalkar J, Chen J, Manduca A, et al. Automated liver stiffness measurements with magnetic resonance elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38:371-379   DOI
26 Bedossa P, Poynard T. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology 1996;24:289-293   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sano K, Morisaka H, Enomoto N, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Magn Reson Med Sci 2012;11:291-297   DOI
28 Park YN, Kim HG, Chon CY, Park JB, Sohn JH, Yang SH, et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis standardized guideline proposed by the Korean Study Group for the Pathology of Digestive Diseases. Korean J Pathol 1999;33:337-346
29 Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839-843   DOI
30 Kim D, Kim WR, Talwalkar JA, Kim HJ, Ehman RL. Advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography. Radiology 2013;268:411-419   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Huwart L, Sempoux C, Vicaut E, Salameh N, Annet L, Danse E, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology 2008;135:32-40   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Poynard T, Munteanu M, Imbert-Bismut F, Charlotte F, Thabut D, Le Calvez S, et al. Prospective analysis of discordant results between biochemical markers and biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Clin Chem 2004;50:1344-1355   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Oliveri F, Coco B, Ciccorossi P, Colombatto P, Romagnoli V, Cherubini B, et al. Liver stiffness in the hepatitis B virus carrier: a non-invasive marker of liver disease influenced by the pattern of transaminases. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:6154-6162   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2001;34:1225-1241   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Wang Y, Ganger DR, Levitsky J, Sternick LA, McCarthy RJ, Chen ZE, et al. Assessment of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis: comparison of MR elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:553-561   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Scheuer PJ, Davies SE, Dhillon AP. Histopathological aspects of viral hepatitis. J Viral Hepat 1996;3:277-283   DOI
37 Marcellin P, Ziol M, Bedossa P, Douvin C, Poupon R, de Ledinghen V, et al. Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis by stiffness measurement in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int 2009;29:242-247   DOI   ScienceOn