Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.1.80

CT-Guided Sclerotherapy for Simple Renal Cysts: Value of Ethanol Concentration Monitoring  

Yu, Jin Hong (Department of Ultrasound, the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College)
Du, Yong (Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College)
Li, Yang (Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College)
Yang, Han Feng (Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College)
Xu, Xiao Xue (Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College)
Zheng, Hou Jun (Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.15, no.1, 2014 , pp. 80-86 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the differences between sclerotherapy with and without ethanol concentration monitoring for the treatment of simple renal cysts. Materials and Methods: Sixty-seven patients with 70 simple renal cysts were randomly assigned to two groups in a 12-month prospective controlled trial. One group (group A) was treated with computed tomography (CT)-guided sclerotherapy without ethanol concentration monitoring (33 patients with 35 cysts), whereas the other group (group B) had ethanol concentration monitoring (34 patients with 35 cysts) during the procedure. Treatment outcomes between the two groups were compared 12 months later with follow-up ultrasound examination. Results: After the 12-month follow-up period, the overall success rate was 74.3% in group A and 94.3% in group B (p = 0.022). The mean cyst size before and after treatment was $8.6{\pm}2.0cm$ and $2.3{\pm}2.9cm$, respectively, in group A, and $8.4{\pm}1.7cm$ and $0.8{\pm}1.9cm$, respectively, in group B. The final size of the cysts in group B was significantly smaller than that in group A (p = 0.015). The likelihood of treatment with ethanol concentration monitoring being successful was approximately 16 times higher than without ethanol concentration monitoring (p = 0.026; odds ratio = 15.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.38-179.49). There were no major complications in either group. Conclusion: Monitoring of Hounsfield units (HU) of ethanol by CT is an effective method in the treatment of simple renal cysts with ethanol sclerotherapy. The ethanol sclerotherapy procedure can be terminated at the point of clear fluid aspiration because the HU (-190) of CT scan corresponds to it.
Keywords
Simple renal cyst; Ethanol-Sclerotherapy; Computed tomography; Interventional radiology;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Yamamoto K, Sakaguchi H, Anai H, Tanaka T, Morimoto K, Kichikawa K, et al. Sclerotherapy for simple cysts with use of ethanolamine oleate: preliminary experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2005;28:751-755   DOI
2 Egilmez H, Gok V, Oztoprak I, Atalar M, Cetin A, Arslan M, et al. Comparison of CT-guided sclerotherapy with using 95% ethanol and 20% hypertonic saline for managing simple renal cyst. Korean J Radiol 2007;8:512-519   DOI
3 Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 1986;158:1-10   DOI
4 Zerem E, Imamovic G, Omerovic S. Symptomatic simple renal cyst: comparison of continuous negative-pressure catheter drainage and single-session alcohol sclerotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1193-1197   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Stevenson JJ, Sherwood T. Conservative management of renal masses. Br J Urol 1971;43:646-647   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Lin YH, Pan HB, Liang HL, Chung HM, Chen CY, Huang JS, et al. Single-session alcohol-retention sclerotherapy for simple renal cysts: comparison of 2- and 4-hr retention techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:860-866   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Chung BH, Kim JH, Hong CH, Yang SC, Lee MS. Comparison of single and multiple sessions of percutaneous sclerotherapy for simple renal cyst. BJU Int 2000;85:626-627
8 Agarwal M, Agrawal MS, Mittal R, Sachan V. A randomized study of aspiration and sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic deroofing in management of symptomatic simple renal cysts. J Endourol 2012;26:561-565   DOI
9 Hanna RM, Dahniya MH. Aspiration and sclerotherapy of symptomatic simple renal cysts: value of two injections of a sclerosing agent. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:781-783   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Okeke AA, Mitchelmore AE, Keeley FX, Timoney AG. A comparison of aspiration and sclerotherapy with laparoscopic de-roofing in the management of symptomatic simple renal cysts. BJU Int 2003;92:610-613   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Sandler CM, Houston GK, Hall JT, Morettin LB. Guided cyst puncture and aspiration. Radiol Clin North Am 1986;24:527-537
12 Xu XX, Du Y, Yang HF, Zhang Q, Li Y, Zee CS. CT-guided sclerotherapy with ethanol concentration monitoring for treatment of renal cysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:W78-W82   DOI
13 Akinci D, Akhan O, Ozmen M, Gumus B, Ozkan O, Karcaaltincaba M, et al. Long-term results of single-session percutaneous drainage and ethanol scleroth erapy in simple renal cysts. Eur J Radiol 2005;54:298-302   DOI
14 Demir E, Alan C, Kilciler M, Bedir S. Comparison of ethanol and sodium tetradecyl sulfate in the sclerotherapy of renal cyst. J Endourol 2007;21:903-905   DOI
15 Cho DS, Ahn HS, Kim SI, Kim YS, Kim SJ, Jeon GS. Sclerotherapy of renal cysts using acetic acid: a comparison with ethanol sclerotherapy. Br J Radiol 2008;81:946-949   DOI
16 Ham WS, Lee JH, Kim WT, Yu HS, Choi Y. Comparison of multiple session 99% ethanol and single session OK-432 sclerotherapy for the treatment of simple renal cysts. J Urol 2008;180:2552-2556   DOI