Which Phantom Is Better for Assessing the Image Quality in Full-Field Digital Mammography?: American College of Radiology Accreditation Phantom versus Digital Mammography Accreditation Phantom |
Song, Sung Eun
(Department of Radiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan Hospital)
Seo, Bo Kyoung (Department of Radiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan Hospital) Yie, An (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital) Ku, Bon Kyung (Department of Radiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan Hospital) Kim, Hee-Young (Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital) Cho, Kyu Ran (Department of Radiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital) Chung, Hwan Hoon (Department of Radiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan Hospital) Lee, Seung Hwa (Department of Radiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan Hospital) Hwang, Kyu-Won (Department of Radiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital) |
1 | Feig SA, Yaffe MJ. Digital mammography. Radiographics 1998;18:893-901 DOI |
2 | Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-1783 DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Setoguchi T, Sakai S, Okafuji T, et al. Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor. Clin Imaging 2011;35:341-345 DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Chon KS, Park JG, Son HH, Kang SH, Park SH, Kim HW, et al. Usefulness of a small-field digital mammographic imaging system using parabolic polycapillary optics as a diagnostic imaging tool: a preliminary study. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:604-612 DOI ScienceOn |
5 | American College of Radiology, Committee on Quality Assurance in Mammography. Mammography quality control manual: radiologist's section, clinical image quality, radiologic technologist's section, medical physicist's section, Rev. ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1999 |
6 | Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Cormack JB, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 2008;246:376-383 DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Fischmann A, Siegmann KC, Wersebe A, Claussen CD, Muller-Schimpfle M. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection. Br J Radiol 2005;78:312-315 DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Krug KB, Stutzer H, Girnus R, Zahringer M, Gossmann A, Winnekendonk G, et al. Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a phantom model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:399-407 DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Butler PF. MQSA and accreditation for full-field digital mammography: everything you need to know in 1/2 hour. In: ACR Breast Imaging Accreditation Programs. Available at: http://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Documents/Accreditation/Mammography/MQSA%20and%20Accreditation%20RSNA07.pdf. Accessed September 28, 2012 |
10 | McLean D, Eckert M, Heard R, Chan W. Review of the first 50 cases completed by the RACR mammography QA programme: phantom image quality, processor control and dose considerations. Australas Radiol 1997;41:387-391 DOI |
11 | Huda W, Sajewicz AM, Ogden KM, Scalzetti EM, Dance DR. How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography? Acad Radiol 2002;9:764-772 DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, Ries LA, Wu X, Jamison PM, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer 2004;101:3-27 DOI ScienceOn |
13 | Yamada T, Suzuki A, Uchiyama N, Ohuchi N, Takahashi S. Diagnostic performance of detecting breast cancer on computed radiographic (CR) mammograms: comparison of hard copy film, 3-megapixel liquid-crystal-display (LCD) monitor and 5-megapixel LCD monitor. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2363-2369 DOI ScienceOn |