Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.5.610

National Survey of Radiation Doses of Pediatric Chest Radiography in Korea: Analysis of the Factors Affecting Radiation Doses  

Kim, Bo Hyun (Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
Do, Kyung-Hyun (Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
Goo, Hyun Woo (Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
Yang, Dong Hyun (Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
Oh, Sang Young (Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
Kim, Hyeog Ju (National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Radiation Safety Division)
Lee, Kwang Yong (National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Radiation Safety Division)
Lee, Jung Eun (National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Radiation Safety Division)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.13, no.5, 2012 , pp. 610-617 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: To investigate radiation doses in pediatric chest radiography in a national survey and to analyze the factors that affect radiation doses. Materials and Methods: The study was based on the results of 149 chest radiography machines in 135 hospitals nationwide. For each machine, a chest radiograph was obtained by using a phantom representing a 5-year-old child (ATOM$^{(R)}$ dosimetry phantom, model 705-D, CIRS, Norfolk, VA, USA) with each hospital's own protocol. Five glass dosimeters (M-GD352M, Asahi Techno Glass Corporation, Shizuoka, Japan) were horizontally installed at the center of the phantom to measure the dose. Other factors including machine's radiography system, presence of dedicated pediatric radiography machine, presence of an attending pediatric radiologist, and the use of automatic exposure control (AEC) were also evaluated. Results: The average protocol for pediatric chest radiography examination in Korea was 94.9 peak kilovoltage and 4.30 milliampere second. The mean entrance surface dose (ESD) during a single examination was 140.4 microgray (${\mu}$Gy). The third quartile, median, minimum and maximum value of ESD were 160.8 ${\mu}$Gy, 93.4 ${\mu}$Gy, 18.8 ${\mu}$Gy, and 2334.6 ${\mu}$Gy, respectively. There was no significant dose difference between digital and non-digital radiography systems. The use of AEC significantly reduced radiation doses of pediatric chest radiographs (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our nationwide survey shows that the third quartile, median, and mean ESD for pediatric chest radiograph is 160.8 ${\mu}$Gy, 93.4 ${\mu}$Gy, and 140.4 ${\mu}$Gy, respectively. No significant dose difference is noticed between digital and non-digital radiography systems, and the use of AEC helps significantly reduce radiation doses.
Keywords
Radiation protection; Pediatric chest radiograph; Diagnostic reference level;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Annals of the ICRP 21, No. 1-3. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1991
2 Radiological protection and safety in medicine. ICRP Publication 73. Annals of the ICRP 26, No. 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1996
3 Japanese Association of Radiological Technologists. "Guideline 2006". Available at: http://www.jart.jp/guideline/index.html
4 Doody MM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE. Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2052-2063   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Tanimura M, Matsui I, Abe J, Ikeda H, Kobayashi N, Ohira M, et al. Increased risk of hepatoblastoma among immature children with a lower birth weight. Cancer Res 1998;58:3032- 3035
6 Shu XO, Potter JD, Linet MS, Severson RK, Han D, Kersey JH, et al. Diagnostic X-rays and ultrasound exposure and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia by immunophenotype. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:177-185
7 Lee YJ, Chung YE, Lim JS, Kim JH, Kim YJ, Lee HJ, et al. Cumulative radiation exposure during follow-up after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Korean J Radiol 2012;13:144-151   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Goo HW. CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 2012;13:1-11   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Goo HW. Pediatric CT: understanding of radiation dose and optimization of imaging techniques. J Korean Radiol Soc 2005;52:1-5   DOI
10 Yang DH, Goo HW. Pediatric 16-slice CT protocols: radiation dose and image quality. J Korean Radiol Soc 2008;59:333-347   DOI
11 Brenner DJ. Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 2002;32:228-231; discussion 242-244   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Hart D, Wall BF, Shrimpton PC, Bungay DR, Dance CR. Reference doses and patient size in pediatric radiology. Chilton: National Radiological Protection Board Report 2000 R318, NRPB, 2003
13 EC Study Group. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in pediatrics. Luxemburg: 1996 EUR 16261, 1996
14 United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. New York: 2000 United Nations, 2000
15 Jung YY, Goo HW. The optimal parameter for radiation dose in pediatric low dose abdominal CT: cross-sectional dimensions versus body weight. J Korean Radiol Soc 2008;58:169-175   DOI
16 Don S. Radiosensitivity of children: potential for overexposure in CR and DR and magnitude of doses in ordinary radiographic examinations. Pediatr Radiol 2004;34 Suppl 3:S167-S172; discussion S234-S241   DOI
17 Huda W. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography. Pediatr Radiol 2004;34 Suppl 3:S173-S182; discussion S234-S241   DOI
18 Schaefer-Prokop C, Neitzel U, Venema HW, Uffmann M, Prokop M. Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1818-1830   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop C. Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:202-208   DOI   ScienceOn