Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.391

Influence of Signal Intensity Non-Uniformity on Brain Volumetry Using an Atlas-Based Method  

Goto, Masami (Department of Radiological Technology, University of Tokyo Hospital)
Abe, Osamu (Department of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine)
Miyati, Tosiaki (Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University)
Kabasawa, Hiroyuki (Japan Applied Science Laboratory, GE Healthcare)
Takao, Hidemasa (Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital)
Hayashi, Naoto (Department of Computational Diagnostic Radiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Tokyo Hospital)
Kurosu, Tomomi (Department of Radiological Technology, University of Tokyo Hospital)
Iwatsubo, Takeshi (Department of Neuropathology, University of Tokyo)
Yamashita, Fumio (Department of Radiology, National Center Hospital of Neurology and Psychiatry)
Matsuda, Hiroshi (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center)
Mori, Harushi (Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital)
Kunimatsu, Akira (Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital)
Aoki, Shigeki (Department of Radiology, Juntendo University)
Ino, Kenji (Department of Radiological Technology, University of Tokyo Hospital)
Yano, Keiichi (Department of Radiological Technology, University of Tokyo Hospital)
Ohtomo, Kuni (Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital)
Japanese Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Japanese Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (Japanese Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.13, no.4, 2012 , pp. 391-402 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: Many studies have reported pre-processing effects for brain volumetry; however, no study has investigated whether non-parametric non-uniform intensity normalization (N3) correction processing results in reduced system dependency when using an atlas-based method. To address this shortcoming, the present study assessed whether N3 correction processing provides reduced system dependency in atlas-based volumetry. Materials and Methods: Contiguous sagittal T1-weighted images of the brain were obtained from 21 healthy participants, by using five magnetic resonance protocols. After image preprocessing using the Statistical Parametric Mapping 5 software, we measured the structural volume of the segmented images with the WFU-PickAtlas software. We applied six different bias-correction levels (Regularization 10, Regularization 0.0001, Regularization 0, Regularization 10 with N3, Regularization 0.0001 with N3, and Regularization 0 with N3) to each set of images. The structural volume change ratio (%) was defined as the change ratio (%) = (100 ${\times}$ [measured volume - mean volume of five magnetic resonance protocols] / mean volume of five magnetic resonance protocols) for each bias-correction level. Results: A low change ratio was synonymous with lower system dependency. The results showed that the images with the N3 correction had a lower change ratio compared with those without the N3 correction. Conclusion: The present study is the first atlas-based volumetry study to show that the precision of atlas-based volumetry improves when using N3-corrected images. Therefore, correction for signal intensity non-uniformity is strongly advised for multi-scanner or multi-site imaging trials.
Keywords
Atlas-based; Bias correction; Brain volumetry; Intensity non-uniformity; Non-parametric non-uniform intensity normalization;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Fox NC, Cousens S, Scahill R, Harvey RJ, Rossor MN. Using serial registered brain magnetic resonance imaging to measure disease progression in Alzheimer disease: power calculations and estimates of sample size to detect treatment effects. Arch Neurol 2000;57:339-344   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Jack CR Jr, Shiung MM, Weigand SD, O'Brien PC, Gunter JL, Boeve BF, et al. Brain atrophy rates predict subsequent clinical conversion in normal elderly and amnestic MCI. Neurology 2005;65:1227-1231   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage 2003;19:1233-1239   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Gonoi W, Abe O, Yamasue H, Yamada H, Masutani Y, Takao H, et al. Age-related changes in regional brain volume evaluated by atlas-based method. Neuroradiology 2010;52:865-873   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Rojas R, Rodríguez AO. Numerical study of the SNR and SAR of MRI coil arrays. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007;2007:1196-1199
6 Simmons A, Tofts PS, Barker GJ, Arridge SR. Sources of intensity nonuniformity in spin echo images at 1.5 T. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:121-128   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Sled JG, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17:87-97   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Arnold JB, Liow JS, Schaper KA, Stern JJ, Sled JG, Shattuck DW, et al. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of six algorithms for correcting intensity nonuniformity effects. Neuroimage 2001;13:931-943
9 Leow AD, Klunder AD, Jack CR Jr, Toga AW, Dale AM, Bernstein MA, et al. Longitudinal stability of MRI for mapping brain change using tensor-based morphometry. Neuroimage 2006;31:627-640   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Vovk U, Pernus F, Likar B. A review of methods for correction of intensity inhomogeneity in MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007;26:405-421
11 Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 2005;26:839-851   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, Hurtig HI, Zimmerman RA. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:351-356   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Jack CR Jr, Bernstein MA, Fox NC, Thompson P, Alexander G, Harvey D, et al. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): MRI methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:685-691   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Schnack HG, van Haren NE, Hulshoff Pol HE, Picchioni M, Weisbrod M, Sauer H, et al. Reliability of brain volumes from multicenter MRI acquisition: a calibration study. Hum Brain Mapp 2004;22:312-320   DOI   ScienceOn
15 van Haren NE, Cahn W, Hulshoff Pol HE, Schnack HG, Caspers E, Lemstra A, et al. Brain volumes as predictor of outcome in recent-onset schizophrenia: a multi-center MRI study. Schizophr Res 2003;64:41-52   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Turner JA, Smyth P, Macciardi F, Fallon JH, Kennedy JL, Potkin SG. Imaging phenotypes and genotypes in schizophrenia. Neuroinformatics 2006;4:21-49   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Kruggel F, Turner J, Muftuler LT; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Impact of scanner hardware and imaging protocol on image quality and compartment volume precision in the ADNI cohort. Neuroimage 2010;49:2123-2133   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Fischl B, Salat DH, van der Kouwe AJ, Makris N, Segonne F, Quinn BT, et al. Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage 2004;23 Suppl 1:S69-S84
19 Kruggel F. MRI-based volumetry of head compartments: normative values of healthy adults. Neuroimage 2006;30:1-11   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Barnes J, Scahill RI, Boyes RG, Frost C, Lewis EB, Rossor CL, et al. Differentiating AD from aging using semiautomated measurement of hippocampal atrophy rates. Neuroimage 2004;23:574-581   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry--the methods. Neuroimage 2000;11:805-821   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Joo EY, Tae WS, Kim ST, Hong SB. Gray matter concentration abnormality in brains of narcolepsy patients. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:552-558   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Thompson PM, Giedd JN, Woods RP, MacDonald D, Evans AC, Toga AW. Growth patterns in the developing brain detected by using continuum mechanical tensor maps. Nature 2000;404:190-193   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Shuter B, Yeh IB, Graham S, Au C, Wang SC. Reproducibility of brain tissue volumes in longitudinal studies: effects of changes in signal-to-noise ratio and scanner software. Neuroimage 2008;41:371-379   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Ewers M, Teipel SJ, Dietrich O, Schönberg SO, Jessen F, Heun R, et al. Multicenter assessment of reliability of cranial MRI. Neurobiol Aging 2006;27:1051-1059   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Jovicich J, Czanner S, Han X, Salat D, van der Kouwe A, Quinn B, et al. MRI-derived measurements of human subcortical, ventricular and intracranial brain volumes: reliability effects of scan sessions, acquisition sequences, data analyses, scanner upgrade, scanner vendors and field strengths. Neuroimage 2009;46:177-192   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Han X, Jovicich J, Salat D, van der Kouwe A, Quinn B, Czanner S, et al. Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: the effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer. Neuroimage 2006;32:180- 194   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Boyes RG, Gunter JL, Frost C, Janke AL, Yeatman T, Hill DL, et al. Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils. Neuroimage 2008;39:1752-1762   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Jovicich J, Czanner S, Greve D, Haley E, van der Kouwe A, Gollub R, et al. Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data. Neuroimage 2006;30:436-443   DOI   ScienceOn