Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2011.12.4.424

The Adverse Events and Hemodynamic Effects of Adenosine-Based Cardiac MRI  

Voigtlander, Thomas (Cardiovascular Center Bethanien (CCB))
Schmermund, Axel (Cardiovascular Center Bethanien (CCB))
Bramlage, Peter (Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Technical University of Dresden)
Elsaasser, Amelie (Institute of Biostatistics, University of Mainz)
Magedanz, Annett (Cardiovascular Center Bethanien (CCB))
Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich (Department of Radiology, University of Heidelberg)
Mohrs, Oliver K. (Department of Radiology, University of Heidelberg)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.12, no.4, 2011 , pp. 424-430 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: We wanted to prospectively assess the adverse events and hemodynamic effects associated with an intravenous adenosine infusion in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease and who were undergoing cardiac MRI. Materials and Methods: One hundred and sixty-eight patients ($64{\pm}9$ years) received adenosine (140${\mu}g$/kg/min) during cardiac MRI. Before and during the administration, the heart rate, systemic blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were monitored using a MRI-compatible system. We documented any signs and symptoms of potential adverse events. Results: In total, 47 out of 168 patients (28%) experienced adverse effects, which were mostly mild or moderate. In 13 patients (8%), the adenosine infusion was discontinued due to intolerable dyspnea or chest pain. No high grade atrioventricular block, bronchospasm or other life-threatening adverse events occurred. The hemodynamic measurements showed a significant increase in the heart rate during adenosine infusion ($69.3{\pm}11.7$ versus $82.4{\pm}13.0$ beats/min, respectively; p < 0.001). A significant but clinically irrelevant increase in oxygen saturation occurred during adenosine infusion ($96{\pm}1.9$% versus $97{\pm}1.3$%, respectively; p < 0.001). The blood pressure did not significantly change during adenosine infusion (systolic: $142.8{\pm}24.0$ versus $140.9{\pm}25.7$ mmHg; diastolic: $80.2{\pm}12.5$ mmHg versus $78.9{\pm}15.6$, respectively). Conclusion: This study confirms the safety of adenosine infusion during cardiac MRI. A considerable proportion of all patients will experience minor adverse effects and some patients will not tolerate adenosine infusion. However, all adverse events can be successfully managed by a radiologist. The increased heart rate during adenosine infusion highlights the need to individually adjust the settings according to the patient, e.g., the number of slices of myocardial perfusion imaging.
Keywords
MRI; Adenosine; Coronary artery disease; Hemodynamics; Adverse events;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 3  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 2
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Budoff MJ, Cohen MC, Garcia MJ, Hodgson JM, Hundley WG, Lima JA, et al. ACCF/AHA clinical competence statement on cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance. Circulation 2005;112:598-617   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Constantine G, Shan K, Flamm SD, Sivananthan MU. Role of MRI in clinical cardiology. Lancet 2004;363:2162-2171   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Gould KL. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. I. Physiologic basis and experimental validation. Am J Cardiol 1978;41:267-278   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Gould KL, Westcott RJ, Albro PC, Hamilton GW. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. II. Clinical methodology and feasibility. Am J Cardiol 1978;41:279-287   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Rossen JD, Quillen JE, Lopez AG, Stenberg RG, Talman CL, Winniford MD. Comparison of coronary vasodilation with intravenous dipyridamole and adenosine. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:485-491   DOI
6 Belardinelli L, Linden J, Berne RM. The cardiac effects of adenosine. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1989;32:73-97   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Schreiber WG, Schmitt M, Kalden P, Horstick G, Gumbrich T, Petersen S, et al. Perfusion MR imaging of the heart with TrueFISP. Rofo 2001;173:205-210   DOI
8 Spies C, Mohrs OK, Madison JR, Fach A, Nowak B, Voigtlander T. Limited flow reserve in non-obstructed bypass grafts supplying infarcted myocardium: implications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging protocols. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8:373-379   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Wilke NM, Jerosch-Herold M, Zenovich A, Stillman AE. Magnetic resonance first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: clinical validation and future applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:676-685   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, Bertschinger K, Buchi M, Knusel PR, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103:2230-2235   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, de Roos A, Zwinderman AH, Jukema JW, Kunz P, et al. Detection of vein graft disease using highresolution magnetic resonance angiography. Circulation 2002;105:328-333   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Voigtlander T, Kreitner KF, Wittlinger T, Petersen S, Horstick G, Kalden P, et al. MR angiography and flow measurement in coronary arteries and coronary bypass grafts. Z Kardiol 2001;90:929-938   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Ali Raza J, Reeves WC, Movahed A. Pharmacological stress agents for evaluation of ischemic heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2001;81:157-167   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Biaggioni I, Killian TJ, Mosqueda-Garcia R, Robertson RM, Robertson D. Adenosine increases sympathetic nerve traffic in humans. Circulation 1991;83:1668-1675   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Karamitsos TD, Arnold JR, Pegg TJ, Cheng AS, van Gaal WJ, Francis JM, et al. Tolerance and safety of adenosine stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:277-283   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Cerqueira MD, Verani MS, Schwaiger M, Heo J, Iskandrian AS. Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:384-389   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Bernhardt P, Steffens M, Kleinertz K, Morell R, Budde R, Leischik R, et al. Safety of adenosine stress magnetic resonance imaging using a mobile cardiac magnetic resonance system. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8:475-478   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Greenwood JP, Younger JF, Ridgway JP, Sivananthan MU, Ball SG, Plein S. Safety and diagnostic accuracy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs exercise tolerance testing early after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Heart 2007;93:1363-1368   DOI   ScienceOn