1 |
Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol 2010;20:734-742
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, Burke W, Costanza ME, Evans WP 3rd, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:141-169
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Berg WA. Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 2004;42:845-851
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Bassett LW, Jackson VP, Fu KL, Fu YS. The medical audit. In: Ross A, Pontee E, eds. Diagnosis of diseases of the breast, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, 2005:135-148
|
5 |
Gordon PB. Ultrasound for breast cancer screening and staging. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:431-441
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology 2006;241:355-365
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Kuhl CK. The "coming of age" of nonmammographic screening for breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299:2203-2205
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Berg WA. Tailored supplemental screening for breast cancer: what now and what next? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:390- 399
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Philpotts LE, Smith RA. Screening for breast cancer. Semin Roentgenol 2003;38:19-33
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Dunser M. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000;21:325-336
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz MJ. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:177-182
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Tabar L, Gad A, Parsons WC, Neeland DB. Mammographic appearances of in situ carcinomas. In: Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios MD, eds. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002:87-104
|
13 |
Stavros AT. Breast anatomy: the basis for understanding sonography. In: McAllister L, Donnellan K, Martin SP, Rothschild R, eds. Breast ultrasound. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004:56-108
|
14 |
Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Bohm-Ve′lez M, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299:2151-2163
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Bevers TB. Ultrasound for the screening of breast cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2008;10:527-528
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Merritt CR. Future directions in breast ultrasonography. Semin Breast Dis 1999;2:89-96
|
17 |
Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:941-948
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, Berlie`re M, Berg BV, D'Hoore W, et al. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1675-1679
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Feig SA. Current status of screening US. In: Feig SA, ed. 2005 Syllabus: categorical course in diagnostic radiology-breast imaging. Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America, 2005:143-154
|
20 |
Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review. Cancer 1995;76:626-630
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001;221:641-649
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M, Bellarosa S, Angelini O, et al. Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. Eur J Cancer 2008;44:539-544
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Nothacker M, Duda V, Hahn M, Warm M, Degenhardt F, Madjar H, et al. Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review. BMC Cancer 2009;9:335
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Houssami N, Lord SJ, Ciatto S. Breast cancer screening: emerging role of new imaging techniques as adjuncts to mammography. Med J Aust 2009;190:493-497
|
25 |
Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1081-1087
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225:165-175
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:168-175
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Kolb TM. Breast US for screening diagnosing, and staging breast cancer: issues and controversies. In: Karellas A, ed. RSNA Categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics: advances in breast imaging-physics, technology, and clinical applications. Oakbrook, IL: Radiological Society of North America, 2004:247-257
|
29 |
Berg WA. Beyond standard mammographic screening: mammography at age extremes, ultrasound, and MR imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2007;45:895-906
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Berg WA. Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1225-1228
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998;207:191-199
|
32 |
Ciatto S, Visioli C, Paci E, Zappa M. Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening. Br J Cancer 2004;90:393-396
DOI
ScienceOn
|