Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2010.11.4.395

Utility of Postmortem Autopsy via Whole-Body Imaging: Initial Observations Comparing MDCT and 3.0T MRI Findings with Autopsy Findings  

Cha, Jang-Gyu (Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital)
Kim, Dong-Hun (Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital)
Kim, Dae-Ho (Department of Radiology, Konyang University Hospital)
Paik, Sang-Hyun (Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital)
Park, Jai-Soung (Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital)
Park, Seong-Jin (Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital)
Lee, Hae-Kyung (Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital)
Hong, Hyun-Sook (Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital)
Choi, Duek-Lin (Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital)
Yang, Kyung-Moo (Department of Forensic Medicine, National Institute of Scientific Investigation)
Chung, Nak-Eun (Department of Forensic Medicine, National Institute of Scientific Investigation)
Lee, Bong-Woo (Department of Forensic Medicine, National Institute of Scientific Investigation)
Seo, Joong-Seok (Department of Forensic Medicine, National Institute of Scientific Investigation)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Radiology / v.11, no.4, 2010 , pp. 395-406 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: We prospectively compared whole-body multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and 3.0T magnetic resonance (MR) images with autopsy findings. Materials and Methods: Five cadavers were subjected to whole-body, 16-channel MDCT and 3.0T MR imaging within two hours before an autopsy. A radiologist classified the MDCT and 3.0T MRI findings into major and minor findings, which were compared with autopsy findings. Results: Most of the imaging findings, pertaining to head and neck, heart and vascular, chest, abdomen, spine, and musculoskeletal lesions, corresponded to autopsy findings. The causes of death that were determined on the bases of MDCT and 3.0T MRI findings were consistent with the autopsy findings in four of five cases. CT was useful in diagnosing fatal hemorrhage and pneumothorax, as well as determining the shapes and characteristics of the fractures and the direction of external force. MRI was effective in evaluating and tracing the route of a metallic object, soft tissue lesions, chronicity of hemorrhage, and bone bruises. Conclusion: A postmortem MDCT combined with MRI is a potentially powerful tool, providing noninvasive and objective measurements for forensic investigations.
Keywords
Computed tomography (CT); Magnetic resonance (MR); Whole-body imaging; Forensic autopsy;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 4
연도 인용수 순위
1 Winkler ML, Olsen WL, Mills TC, Kaufman L. Hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic brain lesions: evaluation with 0.35-T fast MR imaging. Radiology 1987;165:203-207   DOI
2 Yen K, Thali MJ, Aghayev E, Jackowski C, Schweitzer W, Boesch C, et al. Strangulation signs: initial correlation of MRI, MSCT, and forensic neck findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:501-510   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Dalrymple NC, Prasad SR, El-Merhi FM, Chintapalli KN. Price of isotropy in multidetector CT. Radiographics 2007;27:49-62   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Ross S, Spendlove D, Bolliger S, Christe A, Oesterhelweg L, Grabherr S, et al. Postmortem whole-body CT angiography: evaluation of two contrast media solutions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1380-1389   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Wulenweber R, Schneider V, Grumme T. A computertomographical examination of cranial bullet wounds (author's transl). Z Rechtsmed 1977;80:227-246 [German]   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Groves AM, Beadsmoore CJ, Cheow HK, Balan KK, Courtney HM, Kaptoge S, et al. Can 16-detector multislice CT exclude skeletal lesions during tumour staging? Implications for the cancer patient. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1066-1073   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Patriquin L, Kassarjian A, Barish M, Casserley L, O'Brien M, Andry C, et al. Postmortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to autopsy: preliminary clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:277-287   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Ros PR, Li KC, Vo P, Baer H, Staab EV. Preautopsy magnetic resonance imaging: initial experience. Magn Reson Imaging 1990;8:303-308   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Weustink AC, Hunink MG, van Dijke CF, Renken NS, Krestin GP, Oosterhuis JW. Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy? Radiology 2009;250:897-904   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Berry PJ, Keeling JW, Wigglesworth JS. Perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1997;349:55   DOI
11 Brookes JA, Hall-Craggs MA, Sams VR, Lees WR. Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1996;348:1139-1141   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Harris DP, Jackson GM, Klatt EC, Alexander AL, et al. Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:41-46   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Yen K, Lovblad KO, Scheurer E, Ozdoba C, Thali MJ, Aghayev E, et al. Post-mortem forensic neuroimaging: correlation of MDCT and MRI findings with autopsy results. Forensic Sci Int 2007;173:21-35   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Schmidt GP, Kramer H, Reiser MF, Glaser C. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomographycomputed tomography in oncology. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2007;18:193-202   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Dirnhofer R, Jackowski C, Vock P, Potter K, Thali MJ. VIRTOPSY: minimally invasive, imaging-guided virtual autopsy. Radiographics 2006;26:1305-1333   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Bolliger SA, Thali MJ, Ross S, Buck U, Naether S, Vock P. Virtual autopsy using imaging: bridging radiologic and forensic sciences. A review of the Virtopsy and similar projects. Eur Radiol 2008;18:273-282   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Lundberg GD. Low-tech autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: continued value for quality assurance and patient safety. JAMA 1998;280:1273-1274   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Grabherr S, Djonov V, Friess A, Thali MJ, Ranner G, Vock P, et al. Postmortem angiography after vascular perfusion with diesel oil and a lipophilic contrast agent. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:W515-W523   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Newberg AH, Wetzner SM. Bone bruises: their patterns and significance. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1994;15:396-409   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Jackowski C, Christe A, Sonnenschein M, Aghayev E, Thali MJ. Postmortem unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial infarction in correlation to histological infarction age characterization. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2459-2467   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Tosaka M, Sato N, Hirato J, Fujimaki H, Yamaguchi R, Kohga H, et al. Assessment of hemorrhage in pituitary macroadenoma by T2*-weighted gradient-echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:2023-2029   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Yen K, Vock P, Tiefenthaler B, Ranner G, Scheurer E, Thali MJ, et al. Virtopsy: forensic traumatology of the subcutaneous fatty tissue; multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as diagnostic tools. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:799-806
23 Grabherr S, Gygax E, Sollberger B, Ross S, Oesterhelweg L, Bolliger S, et al. Two-step postmortem angiography with a modified heart-lung machine: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:345-351   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Fidelman NA, Wilson MW, Bloom AI, Kerlan RK Jr, LaBerge JM, Gordon RL. Orthopedic spinal and hip prostheses: effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts during MR arteriography and venography of abdomen and pelvis. Radiology 2006;240:894- 899   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Thali MJ, Yen K, Schweitzer W, Vock P, Boesch C, Ozdoba C, et al. Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)--a feasibility study. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:386-403
26 Durlacher SH, Banfield WG Jr, Bergner AD. Post-mortem pulmonary edema. Yale J Biol Med 1950;22:565-572
27 Schmidt GP, Reiser MF, Baur-Melnyk A. Whole-body imaging of the musculoskeletal system: the value of MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2007;36:1109-1119   DOI   ScienceOn