Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.03.2014.0023

Evaluation of Mungbean Genotypes Based on Yield Stability and Reaction to Mungbean Yellow Mosaic Virus Disease  

Alam, A.K.M. Mahbubul (Program in Tropical Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University)
Somta, Prakit (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University)
Jompuk, Choosak (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University)
Chatwachirawong, Prasert (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University)
Srinives, Peerasak (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University)
Publication Information
The Plant Pathology Journal / v.30, no.3, 2014 , pp. 261-268 More about this Journal
Abstract
This work was conducted to identify mungbean genotypes showing yield stability and resistance to mungbean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV) disease. Sixteen genotypes were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with two replications for two years (2011 and 2012) at three locations (Gazipur, Ishurdi and Madaripur) of the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute. An analysis of variance exhibited significant effects of genotype (G), environment (E), and genotype ${\times}$ environment ($G{\times}E$) on grain yield. Among eight agronomic characters, the principal component 1 (PC1) was always higher than the PC2. Considering $G{\times}E$ interaction, BM6 was the best genotype at all three locations in both years. Based on grain yield and stability performance, BM6 ranked first while the worst performing genotypes were BM1 and G10. Based on discrimination and representation, Gazipur was identified as an ideal environment for these mungbeans. Relationship between soil-plant analysis developments (SPAD) value was positive with yield but negative with MYMV severity. BM6, G1 and G2 were considered as promising sources of resistance for low disease score and stable response across the environments. The environment proved to have an influence on MYMV infection under natural infestation. A positive correlation was observed between disease score and the temperature under natural growing condition.
Keywords
disease score; GGE biplot; $genotype{\times}strain$ interaction; mungbean;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Alam, A. K. M. M., Podder, R., Haque, A. H. M. M. and Hossain, A. H. 2010. Handbook of Pulses. Publication No. 28. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Suborno Press, Gazipur, Bangladesh.
2 Anandan, A., Rajiv, G., Eswaran, R. and Prakash, M. 2011. Genotypic variation and relationships between quality traits and trace elements in traditional and improved rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. J. Food Sci. 76:122-130.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Asfaw, A., Gurum, F., Alemayehu, F. and Rezene, Y. 2012. Analysis of multi-environment grain yield trials in mung bean Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek based on GGE biplot in southern Ethiopia. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 14:389-398.
4 Campbell, R. J., Mobley, K. N., Marini, R. P. and Pfeiffer, D. G. 1990. Growing conditions alter the relationship between SPAD-502 values and apple leaf chlorophyll. Hort. Sci. 25: 330-331.
5 Jenns, A. E., Leonard, K. J. and Moll, R. H. 1982. Stability analysis for estimating relative durability of quantitative resistance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 63:183-192.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S. and Booth, R. H. 1995. International breeding programs and resource-poor farmers. In: Eyzaguirre, P. and Iwanaga, M. (eds). Proceedings of a workshop on participatory plant breeding. IPGRI, Rome, Italy. pp. 99-116.
7 Dantre, R. K., Keshwa, R. L. and Khare, M. N. 1996. Biochemical changes induced by yellow mosaic virus in resistant and susceptible cultivars of soyabean (Glycine max L.) Merrill. Indian J. Virol. 12:47-49.
8 Islam, M. S., Latif, M. A., Ali, M. and Hossain, M. S. 2008. Population dynamics of white fly on some recommended mungbean varieties in Bangladesh and its impact on incidence of mungbean yellow mosaic virus disease and yield. Int. J. Agri. Sci. Tech. 2: 41-47.
9 Kariya, K., Matsuzaki, A. and Machida, H. 1982. Distribution of chlorophyll content in leaf blade of rice plant. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 51:134-135.   DOI
10 Larcher, W. 1995. Ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional groups. (3rd ed.). Springer, New York.
11 Mali, P. C., Burman, U. and Satish, L. 2000. Effect of planting dates and development of yellow mosaic virus on biochemical constituents of moth bean genotypes. Indian Phytopath. 53:379-383.
12 R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
13 Marimuthu, T., Subramaniam, C. L. and Mohan, R. 1981. Assesment of yield loss due to yellow mosaic infection in mungbean. Pulse Crops Newsletter. 1:104.
14 Petersen, R. G. 1994. Agricultural field experiments: design and analysis. Marcel Dekker Inc. 270 Madison Avenue, New York.
15 Satterthwaite, F. E. 1946. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biom. Bull. 2:210-214.
16 Rahman, A. H. M., Akanda, A. M. and Ashraful, A. K. M. 2006. Relationship of whitefly population build up with the spread of TYLCV on eight tomato varieties. J. Agric. Rural Dev. 4:67-74.
17 Richardson, A. D., Shane, P., Duigan, G. and Berlyn, P. 2002. An evaluation of non-invasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytol. 153:185-194.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Sheffield, F. N. L. 1993. The development of assimilatory tissue of solanaceous host infected with aucuba mosaic to tomato. Ann. Appl. Biol. 20:57-60.
19 Singh, J. P. 1980. Effect of virus diseases on growth components and yield of mungbean and urd bean. Indian Phytopath. 33: 405-408.
20 Singh, G., Sharma, Y. R. and Kaur, L. 1992. Methods of rating yellow mosaic virus of mungbean and urdbean. Plant Dis. Res. 7:1-6.
21 Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E. 2002. Plant Physiology, 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates Inc. Publishers: Massachusetts.
22 Yan, W. 2001. GGEbiplot-A windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment-trial data and other types of two-way data. Agron J. 93:1111-1118.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Thomas, M. J. R., Fukai, S. and Peoples, M. B. 2004. The effect of timing and severity of water deficit on growth, development, yield accumulation and nitrogen fixation of mungbean. Field Crops Res. 86:67-80.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Ullah, H., Khalil, I. F., Khalil, I. A. and Khattak, G. S. S. 2011. Performance of mungbean genotypes evaluated in multienvironmental trails using the GGE biplot method. Atlas J. Biotech. 1:1-8.   DOI
25 Yadava, U. L. 1986. A rapid and non destructive method to determine chlorophyll on intact leaves. Hort. Sci. 21:1449-1450.
26 Yan, W. and Kang, M. S. 2002. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida.
27 Yan, W. and Falk, D. E. 2002. Biplot analysis of host-by-pathogen data. Plant Dis. 86:1396-1401.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Yan, W. and Tinker, N. A. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Can J. Plant Sci. 86:623-645.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Wahid, A. and Rasul, E. 2004. Photosynthesis in leaf, stem, flower and fruit. pp. 479-497. In: Handbook of Photosynthesis. Pessarakli, M. (ed), CRC Press: Florida.
30 Ullah, H., Khalil, I. F., Durrishahwar, I., Khalil, I. A., Fayaz, M., Yan, J. and Ali, F. 2012. Selecting high yield and stable mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes using GGE biplot techniques. Can. J. Plant Sci. 92:951-960.   DOI
31 Ling, Q., Huang, H. and Jarvis, P. 2011. Use of SPAD-502 meter to measure leaf chlorophyll concentration in Arabidopsis thaliana. Photosynth. Res. 107: 209-214.   DOI
32 Brown, S. B., Houghton, J. D. and Hendry, G. A. F. 1991. Chlorophyll breakdown. In: Chlorophylls, H. Scheer (ed). CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida. pp. 465-489.