Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2011.27.4.367

Multiplex PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Korean Quarantine Phytoplasmas  

Kim, Young-Hwan (School of Applied Bioscience, Kyungpook National University)
Win, Nang Kyu (School of Applied Bioscience, Kyungpook National University)
Back, Chang-Gi (School of Applied Bioscience, Kyungpook National University)
Yea, Mi-Chi (School of Applied Bioscience, Kyungpook National University)
Yim, Kyu-Ock (Animal, Plant and Fisheries Quarantine and Inspection Agency)
Jung, Hee-Young (School of Applied Bioscience, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
The Plant Pathology Journal / v.27, no.4, 2011 , pp. 367-371 More about this Journal
Abstract
Multiplex PCR assays were developed for the simultaneous detection of ten important Korean quarantine phytoplasmas. The species-specific primers were designed based on ribosomal protein, putative preprotein translocase Y, immunodominant protein, elongation factor TU, chaperonin protein and the 16S rRNA genes of 'Candidatus (Ca.) Phytoplasma' species. Three main primer sets were prepared from ten designed primer pairs to limit nonspecific amplification as much as possible. The multiplex PCR assay using the three primer sets successfully amplified the correct conserved genes for each 'Ca. Phytoplasma' species. In addition, ten important 'Ca. Phytoplasma' species could be easily determined by recognizing band patterns specific for each phytoplasma species from three primer sets. Moreover, a high sensitivity of multiplex PCR for each primer set was observed for samples containing a low DNA concentration (10 ng/${\mu}l$). This study provides the useful multiplex PCR assay as a convenient method to detect the presence of ten important quarantine phytoplasmas in Korea.
Keywords
'Candidatus Phytoplasma' species; Detection; Multiplex PCR; Quarantine;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 1  (Related Records In Web of Science)
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bertaccini, A. and Duduk, B. 2009. Phytoplasma and phytoplasma diseases: a review of recent research. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 48:355-378.
2 Clair, D., Larrue, J., Aubert, G., Gillet, J., Cloquemin, G. and Boudon- Padieu, E. 2003. A multiplex nested-PCR assay for sensitive and simultaneous detection and direct identification of phytoplasma in the Elm yellows group and Stolbur group and its use in survey of grapevine yellows in France. Vitis 42:151-157.
3 Torres, E., Bertolini, E., Cambra, M., Monton, C. and Martin, M. P. 2005. Real-time PCR for simultaneous and quantitative detection of quarantine phytoplasmas from apple proliferation (16SrX) group. Mol. Cell. Probes 19:334-340.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Hodgetts, J., Boonham, N., Mumford, R., Harrison, N. and Dickinson, M. 2008. Phytoplasma phylogenetics based on analysis of secA and 23S rRNA gene sequences for improved resolution of candidate species of 'Candidatus Phytoplasma'. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58:1826-1837.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Zhang, J., Hogenhout, S. A., Nault, L. R., Hoy, C. W. and Miller, S. A. 2004. Molecular and symptom analyses of phytoplasma strains from lettuce reveal a diverse population. Phytopathology 94:842-849.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Daire, X., Clair, D., Reinert, S. W. and Boudon-Padieu, E. 1997. Detection and differentiation of grapevine yellows phytoplasmas belonging to the elm yellows group and to the stolbur subgroup by PCR amplification of non-ribosomal DNA. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 103:507-514.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Edwards, M. C. and Gibbs, R. A. 1994. Multiplex PCR: advantages, development, and applications. Genome Res. 3:S65-S75.   DOI
8 Elateek, S. 2010. Molecular and biochemical genetic studies on some leafhopper transmitted plant pathogens. Ph.D Thesis. The Ohio State University, Wooster, USA.
9 Firrao, G., Garcia-Chapa, M. and Marzachì, C. 2007. Phytoplasmas: genetics, diagnosis and relationships with the plant and insect host. Front. Biosci. 12:1353-1375.   DOI
10 Hoshi, A., Oshima, K., Kakizawa, S., Oshima, K. and Namba, S. 2007. Host-parasite interaction of phytoplasmas from a molecular biological perspective. Bull. Insectol. 60:105-107.
11 Lee, I.-M., Davis, R. E. and Gundersen-Rindal, D. E. 2000. Phytoplasma: ecology and genomic diversity. Phytopathology 88:1359-1366.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Lopez, M. M., Bertolini, E., Marco-Noales, E., Llop, P. and Cambra, M. 2006. Update on molecular tools for detection of plant pathogenic bacteria and viruses. In: Molecular diagnostics: current technology and applications, ed. by J.R. Rao, C.C. Fleming, and J.E. Moore, pp.1-46. Horizon Bioscience, Wymondham, UK.
13 Bertaccini, A. 2007. Phytoplasmas: diversity, taxonomy, and epidemiology. Front. Biosci. 12:673-689.   DOI
14 Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. and Gibson, T. J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice, Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.   DOI