Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2005.21.2.127

The Effects of Temperature, pH, and Bactericides on the Growth of Erwinia pyrifoliae and Erwinia amylovora  

Shrestha, Rosemary (Division of Bio-Resources Technology, Kangwon National University)
Lee, Seon-Hwa (Division of Biological Environment, Kangwon National University)
Hur, Jang-Hyun (Division of Bio-Resources Technology, Kangwon National University)
Lim, Chun-Keun (Division of Bio-Resources Technology, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
The Plant Pathology Journal / v.21, no.2, 2005 , pp. 127-131 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this comparative study, the effects of temperature, pH, and bactericides on the growth of Erwinia pyrifoliae and Erwinia amylovora were investigated. The maximum temperature for the growth of both Erwinia species was estimated to be $36{\circ}C$. The maximum specific growth rates of E. pyrifoliae and E. amylovora were observed at $27{\circ}C$ and $28{\circ}C$, respectively, and no significant growth differences were shown at their optimum temperatures. However, at lower temperatures ranging from 12-$21{\circ}C$, E. pyrifoliae showed higher growth rates with doubling times shorter than those of E. amylovora. Distinct growth rates at these temperatures revealed that E. pyrifoliae is more cold-tolerant than E. amylovora. The optimum pH for the growth of both pathogens was 7.5 and growth was not seen at pH ${\le}$ 5.0 and ${\ge}$ 10.0. These results showed that the effect of pH on the growth of E. pyrifoliae and E. amylovora was similar. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of copper sulfate, oxolinic acid, streptomycin, and tetracycline, which inhibited growth of E. pyrifoliae and E. amylovora, were determined. The strains of both pathogens were able to grow at 0.08-0.32 mM copper sulfate, but not at higher concentrations. However, none of the tested strains grew in the presence of oxolinic acid (0.001 mM), streptomycin (0.1 mM), and tetracycline (0.01 mM) concentrations. These results suggested that all strains of both Erwinia species were sensitive to tested bactericides and indicated no occurrence of resistant strains of E. pyrifoliae in Korea.
Keywords
doubling time; $hrpN_Ep$; minimum inhibitory growth; Pyrus pyrifolia; shoot blight;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Mizuno, A., Sato, S., Kaeai, A. and Nishiyama, K. 2000. Taxonomic position of the causal pathogen of bacterial shoot blight of pear. J. Gen. Plant. Pathol. 66:48-58   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Shrestha, R., Koo, J. H., Park, D. H., Hwang, I., Hur, J. H. and Lim, C. K. 2003. Erwinia pyrifoliae, a causal endemic pathogen of shoot blight of Asian pear tree in Korea. Plant Pathol. J. 19:204-300
3 Young, J. M., Leuketina, R. C. and Marshal, A. M. 1977. The effects on temperature on growth in vitro of Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas pruni. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 42:345-354   DOI
4 Maxson-Stein, K., McGhee, G. C., Smith, J. J., Jones, A. L. and Sudin, G. W. 2003. Genetic analysis of a pathogenic Erwinia sp. isolated from pear in Japan. Phytopathology 93: 1393-1399   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Billing, E., Baker, L. A. E., Crosse, J. E. and Garrett, C. M. E. 1961. Characteristics of English isolates of Erwinia amylovora. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 24: 195-211   DOI
6 Beer, S. V., Kim, J. H., Zumoff, C. H., Bogdanove, A. J., Laby, R. J., Gustafson, H. L., Momol, T., Aldwinckle, H. S., Tanii, A. and Tamura, O. 1996. Characterization of bacteria that cause 'bacterial shoot blight of pear' in Japan. Acta Hortic. 411: 179-181
7 Ingraham, J. L., Maloe, O. and Neidhardt, F. C. 1983. Growth of bacterial cell. Sinauer Associates Inc. Massachusetts, USA
8 Jock, S., Jacob, T., Kim, W-S., Hilgebrand, M., Vosberg, H. P. and Geider, K. 2003. Instability of short-sequence DNA repeats of pear pathogenic Erwinia strains from Japan and Erwinia amylovora fruit tree and raspberry strains. Mol. Genet. Genomics 268:739-749
9 Ark, P. A. 1937. Variability in the fire blight organism, Erwinia amylovora. Phytopathology 27: 1-28   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Billing, E. 1974. The effect of temperature on the growth of the fire blight pathogen, Erwinia amylovora. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 37:643-648   DOI
11 Kim, W-S., Gardan, L., Rhim, S. L. and Geider, K. 1999. Erwinia pyrifoliae sp. nov., a noval pathogen affecting Asian pear trees (Pyrus pyrifoliae Nakai). Intl. J. Sys. Bacteriol. 49:899-906   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Rhim, S.-L., Voelkisch, B., Gardan, L., Paulin, J. P., Langlotz, C., Kim, W-S. and Geider, K. 1999. An Erwinia species, different from E. amylovora cause a necrotic disease of Asian pear trees. Plant Pathol. 48:514-520   DOI
13 Kim, W-S., Jock, S., Paulin, J. P., Rhim, S.-L. and Geider, K. 2001. Molecular detection and differentiation of Erwinia pyrifoliae and Host range analysis of the Asian pear pathogen. Plant Dis. 85:1183-1188   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Bonn, W G and Van der Zwet, T. 2000. Distribution and economic importance of fire blight. In Vanneste J. L. (ed), Fire blight: The disease and its causative agent, Erwinia amylovora. CABI publishing, UK, pp 37-53
15 Mc Manus, P. S., and Jones, A. L. 1994. Epidemiology and genetic analysis of streptomycin-resistant Erwinia amylovora from Michigan and evaluation of oxytetracycline for control. Phytopathology. 84:627-633   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Pirt, S. J. 1975. Principles of microbe and cell cultivation. Blackwell, Oxford, UK
17 Van der Zwet, T. and Keil, H. L. 1979. Fire blight - A bacterial disease of rosaceous plants. United States Department of Agriculture Handbook 510, Washington DC, USA
18 Begot, C., Desnier, I., Daudin, J. D., Labadie, J. C. and Lebert, A. 1996. Recommendations for calculating growth parameters by optical density measurements. J. Microbiol. Methods 25:225-232   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Shrestha, R., Tsuchiya, K., Baek, S. J., Bae, H. N., Hwang, I., Hur, J. H. and Lim, C. K. 2005. Identification of dspEF. hrpW, and hrpN loci and characterization of the $hrpN_{Ep}$ gene in Erwinia pyrifoliae. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 71 (in press)