Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3807/JOSK.2002.6.3.100

Another Quantum Eraser Experiment with Two-photon States of Light  

Kim, Tae-Soo (School of Mathematics and Applied Physics, University of Ulsan)
Ko, Jeong-Hoon (School of Mathematics and Applied Physics, University of Ulsan)
Kim, Heonoh (School of Mathematics and Applied Physics, University of Ulsan)
Publication Information
Journal of the Optical Society of Korea / v.6, no.3, 2002 , pp. 100-104 More about this Journal
Abstract
The quantum eraser experiment was revisited, using entangled photons of visible light in a Hong-Ou-Handel type interferometer with a magnitude two orders higher than before in count rates. We introduced which-path information by polarization and subsequently erasied this information by means of polarizers in front of detectors. It was found that the visibility of the interference fringe is revived from 0% to 88% as the polarizers are changed from 0$^{\circ}$ to 45$^{\circ}$.
Keywords
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 P. H. Souto Ribeiro, S. Padua, and C. H. Monken, Opt. Comm. 186, 143 (2000)   DOI   ScienceOn
2 A. Trifonov, G. Bjork, J. Sooderholm, and T. Tsegaye. Eur. Phys. J. D 18, 251 (2002)   DOI
3 P. G. Kwiat, A. M. Steinberh, and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. A 45, 7729 (1992)   DOI   ScienceOn
4 T. J. Herzog, P. G. Kwiat, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3034 (1995)   DOI   ScienceOn
5 E. Schrodinger, Naturwissenschaften, 23, 807 (1935)   DOI
6 T.-G. Noh and C. K. Hong, J. Kor. Phys. Soc. 33, 383 (1998)
7 T. Tsegaye, G. Bjork, M. AtatUre, A. V. Sergienko, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Phys. Rev. A 62, 032106 (2000)   DOI   ScienceOn
8 M. O. Scully, B.-G. Englert, and H. Walther, Nature 351, 111 (1991)   DOI
9 N. Bohr, Naturwissenschaften, 16,245 (1928)   DOI
10 M. O. Scully and K. Druhl, Phys. Rev. A 25, 2208 (1982)   DOI
11 A. G. Zajonc, L. J. Wang, X. Y. Zou, and L. Mandel, Nature 353, 507 (1991)   DOI
12 D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, Physics Today, 46, 22 (1993)   DOI   ScienceOn
13 F. Hervut and M. Vujicic, Phys. Rev. A 56, 931 (1997)   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Y.-H. Kim, R. Y., S. P. Kulik, and Y. Shih, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1 (2001)   DOI   ScienceOn
15 S. P. Walborn, M. O. Terra Cunha, S. Padua, and C. H. Monken, Phys. Rev. A 65, 033818 (2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
16 T. Kim, J. Shin, Y. Ha, H. Kim, G. Park, T. G. Noh, and C. K. Hong, Opt. Comm. 156, 37 (1998)   DOI   ScienceOn
17 C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044 (1987)   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Y. Ha, T. S. Kim, H. S. Kim, and C. K. Hong, Soo Mulli (Korean Edition) 35, 322 (1995)   DOI   ScienceOn
19 J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, Quantum Theory and Measurement(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1983) p. 9
20 A. Zeilinger, Physica Scripta, T76, 203 (1998)   DOI   ScienceOn
21 D. C. Burnham and D. L. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 84 (1970)   DOI
22 J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, Quantum Theory and Measurement(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1983) p. 9.
23 Phys. Rev. A 49, 61 (1994)   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Z. Y. Ou, Phys. Lett. A 226, 323 (1997)   DOI   ScienceOn
25 T. Kim, J. Shin, Y. Ha, H. Kim, G. Park, T. G. Noh, and C. K. Hong, Opt. Comm. 156, 37 (1998)   DOI   ScienceOn
26 C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044 (1987)   DOI   ScienceOn