Browse > Article

Mobility Management Requirements and Framework for Systems Beyond IMT-2000  

Jung Hee Young (Protocol Engineering Center, Electronics Telecommunications Research Institute)
Koh Seok Joo (School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Communications and Networks / v.7, no.2, 2005 , pp. 171-177 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper addresses mobility management (MM) requirements and framework for systems beyond IMT-2000 (SBI2K), based on the standardization works that has so far been done in ITU-T study group 19. We first identify the requirements for MM in SBI2K. Based on the identified MM requirements, we describe the MM framework for location management and handover management for SBI2K. We then review and analyze some of the existing IP-based MM protocols. From the analysis and comparison, we see that the existing MM schemes cannot meet all of the MM requirements for SBI2K. It is naturally concluded that further work is needed to enhance the available MM schemes SBI2K.
Keywords
IMT-2000; mobility management; SBI2K;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 2  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 E. Gustafsson, A. Jonsson, and C. Perkins, 'Mobile IPv4 regional regis­tration,' IETF Draft, draft-ietf-mip4-reg-tunnel-00.txt, Nov. 2004
2 H. Soliman et al., 'Hierarchical mobile IPv6 mobility management (HMIPv6),' IETF Draft, draft-ietf-mipshop-hmipv6-04.txt, Dec. 2004
3 IETF RFC 3262, 'SIP: Locating SIP servers,' June 2002
4 D. Saha et al., 'Mobility support in IP: A survey of related protocols,' IEEE Network, vol. 18, pp. 34-40, Nov. 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
5 E. Wedlund and H. Schulzrinne, 'Mobility support using SIP,' in Proc. WoWMoN'99, Seattle, USA, 1999, pp. 76-82
6 ITU- T draft Recommendation Q.MMF, 'Mobility management frame­work for systems beyond IMT-2000,' work in progress, 2005
7 ITU- T Recommendation Q.1702, 'Long-term vision of network aspects for systems beyond IMT-2000,' June 2002
8 R. Stewart et al., 'Stream control transmission protocol (SCTP) dynamic address reconfiguration,' IETF Draft, draft-ietf-tsvwg-addip-sctp-10.txt, Jan. 2005
9 IETF RFC 3344, 'IP mobility support for IPv4,' Aug. 2002
10 ITU-R Recommendation M.1645, 'Vision framework and overall objec­tives of the future development of IMT-2000 and of systems beyond IMT­2000,' June 2003
11 ITU-T Supplement Q.Sup52, 'Mobility management requirements for systems beyond IMT-2000,' Dec. 2004
12 IETF RFC 3775, 'Mobility support in IPv6,' June 2004
13 IETF RFC 2960, 'Stream control transmission protocol,' Oct. 2000
14 ITU- T Recommendation Q.1703, 'Service and network capabilities framework of network aspects for systems beyond IMT-2000,' 2004
15 K. EI Malki et al., 'Low latency handoffs in mobile IPv4,' IETF Draft, draft-ietf-mobileip-Iowlatency-handoffs-v4-09.txt, June 2004
16 IETF RFC 3261, 'SIP: Session initiation protocol,' June 2002
17 C. Politis et al., 'Multilayer mobility management for all-IP networks: Pure SIP vs. hybrid SIP/mobile IP,' in Proc. IEEE VTC 2003, vol. 4, Apr. 2003, pp.2500-2504   DOI
18 R. Koodli et al., 'Fast handovers for mobile IPv6,' IETF Draft, draft-ietf­mipshop-fast-mipv6-03.txt, Oct. 2004
19 S. J. Koh et al., 'mSCTP for soft handover in transport layer,' IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 189-191, Mar. 2004   DOI   ScienceOn