Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7236/IJIBC.2022.14.3.270

A study on the relationship between proprietary information cost and the quality of disclosure  

Kim, Ki Beom (Department of Business Administration, Mokpo National University)
Lee, Han Geun (Department of Business Administration, Mokpo National University)
Publication Information
International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication / v.14, no.3, 2022 , pp. 270-275 More about this Journal
Abstract
Examining whether the relationship between proprietary information cost and management's disclosure decision is also valid for domestic companies is expected to provide meaningful implications for investors and regulatory authorities. However, there are no domestic studies related to proprietary information costs so far. This study examines whether managers tend to lower the disclosure level at their discretion in consideration of proprietary information costs. This study used the measurement quality of disclosure to examine whether managers tend to lower the disclosure level at their discretion in consideration of proprietary information costs. As a result of empirical analysis, it was confirmed that there is a negative relationship between proprietary information cost and the quality of disclosure. This suggests that management tends to make disclosure decisions in consideration of not only the benefits of disclosure but also proprietary information costs resulting from disclosure in order to maximize corporate value. These findings are expected to have significant implications for investors and related policy authorities.
Keywords
proprietary information cost; quality of voluntary disclosure; capital costs;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 M. H. Zhang, The Dif erential of Proprietary Cost on the Quality versus Quantity of Voluntary Corporate Disclosures, Dissertation Paper, University of Texas at Austin, USA, 2005.
2 C. A. Botosan and M. Stanford, "Managers' Motives to Withhold Segment Disclosures and the Effect of SFAS No. 131 on Analysts' Information Environment," Accounting Review, Vol. 80, pp. 751-771, 2005. DOI:10.2308/accr.2005.80.3.751   DOI
3 D. Easley and M. O'Hara, "Information and the cost of capital," Journal of Finance, pp. 2185-2221, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00672.x.   DOI
4 Schmalensee, R., "Intra-industry profitability differences in US manufacturing," Journal of industrial economics, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 1953-1983, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2098372   DOI
5 R. E. Verrecchia, "Discretionary Disclosure", Journal of Accounting and Economics," Vol. 5, pp. 179-194, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(83)90011-3   DOI
6 R. Hayes and R. Lundholm, "Segment reporting to the capital market in the presence of a competitor," Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 261-279, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2491502   DOI
7 P. Newman and R. Sansing, "Disclosure policies withmultiple users," Journal ofAccountingResearch, Vol. 31, pp. 92-112, Spring 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2491043   DOI