Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5478/MSL.2020.11.4.71

A Simple and Efficient Method to Determine Montelukast in Rat Plasma Using Liquid-Liquid Extraction and Tandem Mass Spectrometry  

Kim, Dong Yoon (College of Pharmacy, Dankook University)
Lee, Hyo Chun (College of Pharmacy, Dankook University)
Jang, Yong Jin (College of Pharmacy, Dankook University)
Kim, Jin Hee (College of Pharmacy, Dankook University)
Lee, Ha Ryeong (College of Pharmacy, Dankook University)
Kang, Myung Joo (College of Pharmacy, Dankook University)
Choi, Yong Seok (College of Pharmacy, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Mass Spectrometry Letters / v.11, no.4, 2020 , pp. 71-76 More about this Journal
Abstract
While montelukast (ML), a cysteinyl-leukotriene type 1 receptor (CysLT1) antagonist is widely used to treat symptoms of rhinitis or asthma, its formulations are mainly limited to solid preparation due to its instability. Recently, there have been attempts to develop various ML dosage forms, and this situation increases the demand of sensitive and creditable methods to determine ML in various samples such as plasma. Thus, here, a simple and efficient method to determine ML in rat plasma using liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and multiple reaction monitoring was presented. The mixture of DCM:EtOAc (25:75, v/v), the optimized extract solvent for LLE was found to be effective to extract ML without hydrophilic salts and proteins from the sample with limited volume. Also, the use of zafirlukast, instead of expensive ML-d6, as the internal standard makes the present method economical. The developed method was successfully validated in terms of selectivity, matrix effects (-14.8--6.9%), linearity (r230.998 within 0.5-500 ng/mL), sensitivity (the limit of detection and the lower limit of quantitation, ≤0.5 ng/mL), accuracy (88.4-100.6%), precision (3.0-13.3%), and recovery (80.8-86.3%) by following the FDA guidelines. Finally, the applicability of the validated method to pharmacokinetics (PK) studies was confirmed by the successful determination of PK parameters through it following oral administration of Singulair® granule in rats. Therefore, the present method can contribute to the development of new ML formulations through its performance to determine ML in rat plasma efficiently and sensitively.
Keywords
montelukast; multiple reaction monitoring; liquid-liquid extraction; rat plasma; pharmacokinetics;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Zaid, A. N.; Mousa, A.; Ghazal, N.; Bustami, R. Clin. Transl. Allergy 2015, 5, 37, DOI: 10.1186/s13601-015-0081-8.   DOI
2 Curran, D. P.; Werner, S. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1021, DOI: 10.1021/ol0499248.   DOI
3 Karonen, T.; Neuvonen, P. J.; Backman, J. T. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012, 73, 257, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04086.x.   DOI
4 1. Diamant, Z.; Mantzouranis, E.; Bjermer, L. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2009, 5, 639, DOI: 10.1586/eci.09.62   DOI
5 Lambiase, A.; Bonini, S.; Rasi, G. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2003, 121, 615, DOI: 10.1001/archopht.121.5.615.   DOI
6 Al Omari, M. M.; Zoubi, R. M.; Hasan, E. I.; Khader, T. Z.; Badwan, A. A. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2007, 45, 465, DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2007.07.014.   DOI
7 Lim, S. H. Design of montelukast nanocrystals for enhanced transdermal delivery, master's thesis, Dankook University, Cheonan, South Korea. 2018.
8 Ezzeldin, E.; Abo-Talib, N. F.; Tammam. M. H.; Shahat, A. A. Chem. Cent. J. 2014, 8, 17, DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-8-17.   DOI
9 Huang, Y.; Ding, L.; Liu, Y. Y.; Liu, H.; Wen, A.; Yang, L. J. Chinese Pharm. Sci. 2009, 18, 261.
10 Kim, D. W.; Kim, Y. H.; Yousaf, A. M.; Kim, D. S.; Kwon, Y. K.; Park, J. H.; Kim, Y. I.; Park, J. H.; Jin, S. G.; Kim, K. S.; Cho, K. H.; Li, D. X.; Kim, J. O.; Yong, C. S.; Woo, J. S.; Choi, H. G. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2016, 39, 539, DOI: 10.1007/s12272-015-0664-x.   DOI
11 Challa, B. R.; Awen, B. Z.; Chandu, B. R.; Khagga, M.; Kotthapalli, C. B. Sci. Pharm. 2010, 78, 411, DOI: 10.3797/scipharm.1002-07.   DOI
12 Moein, M. M.; Beqqali, A. E.; Abdel-Rehim, M. J. Chromatogr. B 2017, 1043, 3, DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.09.028.   DOI
13 Ashri, N. Y.; Abdel-Rehim, M. Matrix Biol. 2011, 3, 2003, DOI: 10.4155/bio.11.201.   DOI
14 Park, J. S.; Cho, H. R.; Kang, M. J.; Choi, Y. S. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2016, 39, 73, DOI: 10.1007/s12272-015-0681-9.   DOI
15 Jessome, L. L.; Volmer, D. A. LC GC North Am. 2006, 24, 498.
16 Annesley, T. M. Clin. Chem. 2003, 49, 1041, DOI: 10.1373/49.7.1041.   DOI
17 Crescenzi, C.; Corcia, A. D.; Marchese, S.; Samperi, R. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 1968, DOI: 10.1021/ac00109a010.   DOI
18 Muppavarapu, R.; Guttikara, S.; Rajappan, M.; Kamarajan, K.; Mullangi, R. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2014, 28, 1048, DOI: 10.1002/bmc.3114.   DOI
19 Lee, H. C.; Kim, D. Y.; Choi, M.-J.; Jin, S. G.; Choi, Y. S. Mass Spectrorm. Lett. 2019, 10, 66, DOI: 10.5478/MSL.2019.10.2.66.   DOI
20 Kim, C. H.; Kang, T. H,; Kim, B. D.; Lee, T. H.; Yoon, H. Y.; Goo, Y. T.; Choi, Y. S; Kang, M. J.; Choi, Y. W. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 583: 119393, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119393.   DOI
21 Food and Drug Administration. Boanalytical method validation: guidance for industry FDA-2013-D-1020. 2019.
22 Papp, R.; Luk, P.; Mullet, W. M.; Kwong, E. J. Chromatogr. B 2007, 858, 282, DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.08.003.   DOI