Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5478/MSL.2020.11.2.36

Comparison of Cell Lysis Techniques via Q-TOF LC/MS  

Kaplan, Ozan (Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University)
Oncul, Selin (Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University)
Ercan, Ayse (Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University)
Celebier, Mustafa (Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University)
Publication Information
Mass Spectrometry Letters / v.11, no.2, 2020 , pp. 36-40 More about this Journal
Abstract
Untargeted metabolomics is a useful tool for drug development focusing on novel chemotherapeutic and chemopreventative agents against cancer cells. In recent years, quadrupole time of flight liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (Q-TOF LC/MS)-based untargeted metabolomic approaches have gained importance to evaluate the effect of these agents at the molecular level. The researchers working on cell culture studies still do not apply standardized methodologies on sample preparation for untargeted metabolomics approaches. In this study, the rough and wet lysis techniques performed on MCF-7 breast cancer cells were compared with each other via the Q-TOF LC/MS-based metabolomic approach. The C18 and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) columns were used for the separation of the metabolites in MCF-7 cell lysates. 505 peaks were detected through the HILIC column and 551 peaks were found through the C18 column for the wet lysis technique. This situation supported by the base peak chromatograms showed that the wet lysis technique allowed us to extract higher number of non-polar metabolites. Almost equal number of metabolites was found for the C18 and HILIC columns (697 peaks for the HILIC column and 695 peaks for the C18 column) when the rough lysis technique was used. However, the intensities of polar metabolites were higher for the rough lysis technique on base peak chromatograms for both the HILIC and C18 columns. Although cell lysis technique, which is the first step in the sample preparation for cell culture studies, does not cause dramatic differences in the number of the detected metabolite peaks, it affects the polar and non-polar metabolite ratio significantly. Therefore, it must be considered carefully especially for in vitro drug development studies.
Keywords
Cell lysis techniques; Cell membrane; Untargeted metabolomics; Q-TOF LC/MS; XCMS;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Dunn, W. B. Phys. Biol. 2008, 5, 011001.   DOI
2 Dunn, W. B.; Erban, A.; Weber, R. J.; Creek, D. J.; Brown, M.; Breitling, R.; Hankemeier, T.; Goodacre, R.; Neumann, S.; Kopka, J. Metabolomics 2013, 9, 44.   DOI
3 Alonso, A.; Marsal, S.; Julia, A. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2015, 3, 23.   DOI
4 Bruce, S. J.; Tavazzi, I.; Parisod, V. R.; Rezzi, S.; Kochhar, S.; Guy, P. A. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 3285.   DOI
5 Vuckovic, D. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 403, 1523.   DOI
6 Gika, H.; Theodoridis, G. Bioanalysis 2011, 3, 1647.   DOI
7 Tulipani, S.; Llorach, R.; Urpi-Sarda, M.; Andres-Lacueva, C. Anal. Chem. 2012, 85, 341.   DOI
8 Xiong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, J.; Yan, G.; Lu, H. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 2018, 78, 5.8.1.   DOI
9 Wang, J.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, S.; Du, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, X.; Chen, W. Talanta 2019, 191, 119.   DOI
10 Poglitsch, M.; Katholnig, K.; Saemann, M. D.; Weichhart, T. J. Immunol. Methods 2011, 373, 167.   DOI
11 Libiseller, G.; Dvorzak, M.; Kleb, U.; Gander, E.; Eisenberg, T.; Madeo, F.; Neumann, S.; Trausinger, G.; Sinner, F.; Pieber, T. BMC Bioinformatics 2015, 16, 118.   DOI
12 Buszewski, B.; Noga, S. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 402, 231.   DOI
13 Pesek, J.; Matyska, M. T. LC-GC 2007, 25, 480.
14 Cubbon, S.; Antonio, C.; Wilson, J.; Thomas?Oates, J. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2010, 29, 671.   DOI
15 Tang, D. Q.; Zou, L.; Yin, X. X.; Ong, C. N. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2016, 35, 574.   DOI
16 Virgiliou, C.; Sampsonidis, I.; Gika, H. G.; Raikos, N.; Theodoridis, G. A. Electrophoresis 2015, 36, 2215.   DOI
17 Kaplan, O.; Celebier, M. Mass Spectrom. Lett. 2020, 11, 1.   DOI