Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5478/MSL.2014.5.3.63

A Simple Carbamidomethylation-Based Isotope Labeling Method for Quantitative Shotgun Proteomics  

Oh, Donggeun (Department of Bio-Analytical Science, University of Science & Technology)
Lee, Sun Young (Center for Bioanalysis, Division of Metrology for Quality of Life, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science)
Kwon, Meehyang (Center for Bioanalysis, Division of Metrology for Quality of Life, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science)
Kim, Sook-Kyung (Center for Bioanalysis, Division of Metrology for Quality of Life, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science)
Moon, Myeong Hee (Department of Chemistry, Yonsei University)
Kang, Dukjin (Center for Bioanalysis, Division of Metrology for Quality of Life, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science)
Publication Information
Mass Spectrometry Letters / v.5, no.3, 2014 , pp. 63-69 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, we present a new isotope-coded carbamidomethylation (iCCM)-based quantitative proteomics, as a complementary strategy for conventional isotope labeling strategies, with providing the simplicity, ease of use, and robustness. In iCCM-based quantification, two proteome samples can be separately isotope-labeled by means of covalently reaction of all cysteinyl residues in proteins with iodoacetamide (IAA) and its isotope (IAA-$^{13}C_2$, $D_2$), denoted as CM and iCCM, respectively, leading to a mass shift of all cysteinyl residues to be + 4 Da. To evaluate iCCM-based isotope labeling in proteomic quantification, 6 protein standards (i.e., bovine serum albumin, serotransferrin, lysozyme, beta-lactoglobulin, beta-galactosidase, and alpha-lactalbumin) isotopically labeled with IAA and its isotope, mixed equally, and followed by proteolytic digestion. The resulting CM-/iCCM-labeled peptide mixtures were analyzed using a nLC-ESI-FT orbitrap-MS/MS. From our experimental results, we found that the efficiency of iCCM-based quantification is more superior to that of mTRAQ, as a conventional nonisobaric labeling method, in which both of a number of identified peptides from 6 protein standards and the less quantitative variations in the relative abundance ratios of heavy-/light-labeled corresponding peptide pairs. Finally, we applied the developed iCCM-based quantitative method to lung cancer serum proteome in order to evaluate the potential in biomarker discovery study.
Keywords
isotope-coded carbamidomethylation; quantitative proteomics; nonisobaric isotope labeling;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Gygi, S. P.; Rist, B.; Gerber, S. A.; Turecek, F.; Gelb, M. H.; Aebersold, R. Nature Biotechnology 1999, 17, 994.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Schiess, R.; Wollscheid, B.; Aebersold, R. Molecular Oncology 2009, 3, 33.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Wolters, D. A.; Washburn, M. P.; Yates, J. R. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 5683.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Aebersold, R.; Mann, M. Nature 2003, 422, 198.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Asara, J, M.; Christofk, H. R.; Freimark, L. M.; Cantley, L. C. Proteomics 2008, 8, 994.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Thompson, A.; Schafer, J.; Kuhn, K.; Kienle, S.; Schwarz, J.; Schmidt, G.; Neumann, T.; Hamon, C. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 1895.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Ye, X.; Luke, B.; Andresson, T.; Blonder, J. Briefings in Functional Genomics & Proteomics 2009, 8, 136.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Kang, U. B.; Yeom, J.; Kim, H.; Lee, C. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 3750.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kim, J. Y.; Kim, S. K.; Kang, D.; Moon, M. H. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 5343.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Duche, J. C.; Urien, S.; Simon, N.; Malaurie, E.; Monnet, I.; Barre, J. Clin Biochem. 2000, 33,197.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Pallis, A. G.; Gridelli C.; van, M. J. P.; Greillier, L.; Wedding U.; Lacombe, D.; Welch, J.; Belani, C. P.; Aapro, M. Ann. Oncol. 2010, 21, 692.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Heo, S. H.; Lee, S. J.; Ryoo, H. M.; Park, J. Y.; Cho, J. Y. Proteomics 2007, 7, 4292.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Zeng, X.; Hood, B. L.; Sun, M.; Conrads, T. P.; Day, R. S.; Weissfeld, J. L.; Bigbee, W. L. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 6440.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Tyan, Y. C.; Wu, H. Y.; Lai, W. W.; Su, W. C.; Liao, P. C. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 1274.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Dowling, P.; O'Driscoll, L.; Meleady, P.; Henry, M.; Roy, S.; Ballot, J.; Moriarty, M.; Crown, J.; Clynes, M. Electrophoresis 2007, 28, 4302.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Wang, C. L.; Wang, C. I.; Liao, P. C., Chen; C. D., Liang, Y.; Chuang, W. Y.; Tsai, Y. H.; Chen, H. C.; Chang, Y. S.; Yu, J. S.; Wu, C. C.; Yu, C. J. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 4428.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Ahn, Y. H.; Shin, P. M.; Oh, N. R.; Park, G. W.; Kim, H.; Yoo, J. S. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 5507.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Ong, S. E.; Blagoev, B.; Kratchmarova, I.; Kristensen, D. B.; Steen, H.; Pandey, A.; Mann, M. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2002, 1, 76.