Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5478/MSL.2012.3.2.58

Determination of Mercury in Fly Ash by Using Flow Injection Cold Vapor Isotope Dilution Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry  

Suh, Jung-Ki (Division of Metrology for Quality of Life, Analytical Chemistry Laboratory (KRISS))
Min, Hyung-Sik (Division of Metrology for Quality of Life, Analytical Chemistry Laboratory (KRISS))
Kamruzzaman, Mohammad (Department of Chemistry, Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Sang-Hak (Department of Chemistry, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
Mass Spectrometry Letters / v.3, no.2, 2012 , pp. 58-61 More about this Journal
Abstract
A method based on flow injection-isotope dilution-cold vapor-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (FI-IDCV-ICP/MS) has been applied to determine trace level of mercury in fly ash. $^{200}Hg$ isotopic spike was added to 0.25 g of BCR176R fly ash and then decomposed by microwave digestion procedure with acid mixture A (8 mL $HNO_3$ + 2 mL HCl + 2 mL HF) and acid mixture B (8 mL $HNO_3$ + 2 mL $HClO_4$ + 2 mL HF) for applying IDMS. Mercury cold vapor was generated by using reductant solution of 0.2% (w/w) $NaBH_4$ and 0.05% (w/w) NaOH. The measurements of n($^{200}Hg$)/n($^{202}Hg$) isotope ratio was made using a quadrupole ICP/MS system. The accuracy in this method was verified by the analysis of certified reference material (CRM) of fly ash (BCR 176R). The indicative value of Hg in BCR 176R fly ash was $1.60{\pm}0.23$ mg/kg (k = 2). The determined values of Hg in BCR 176R fly ash by the method of FI-CV-ID-ICP/MS described in this paper were $1.60{\pm}0.24$ mg/kg (k = 3.18) and the analysis results were in well agreement with the indicative value within the range of uncertainty.
Keywords
Mercury; Flow injection; Cold-vapor; Isotope dilution-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; BCR CRM 176R; Fly ash;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Chen, S. F.; Jiang, S. J. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 1998, 13, 673.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Liao, H. C.; Jiang, S. J. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 1999, 14, 1583.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Long, S. E.; Kelly, W. R. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 1477.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Willie, S. Am. Lab. 2002, 34, 40.
5 Mester, M.; Angelone, M.; Brunori, C.; Cremisini, C.; Muntau, H.; Moraboto, R. Analytica Chimica Acta 1999, 395, 157.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Woller, A.; Garraund, H.; Martin, A.; Donard, O. F. X.; Fodor, P. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 1997, 12, 53.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 De Bievre, P. J. Fresenius Anal. Chem. 1994, 350, 277.   DOI
8 Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement: SBN 92-67-10188-9, 1st ed. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993.
9 Tayor, B. N.; Kuyatt, C. E. Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results; NIST technical note 1297, U. S. Government Printing Office: Washington DC, 1994.
10 EURACHEM Guide: The fitness for purpose of analytical methods. A laboratory guide to method validation and related topics, 1st ed. Eurachem: 1998.
11 Taylor H. E. (eds.) Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: Practice and techniques, Academic Press, 2001.
12 Allibone, J.; Fatemian, E.; Walker, P. J. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 1999, 14, 235.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Mann, J. L.; Long, S. E.; Kelly, W. R. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2003, 18, 1293.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Costley, C. T.; Mossop, K. F.; Dean, J. R.; Gargen, L. M.; Marshall, J.; Carroll, J. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 405, 179.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Armstrong, H. L.; Corns, W. T.; Stockwell, P. B.; O'Connor, G.; Ebdon, L.; Evans, E.H. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 390, 245.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Milton, M. J. T.; Quinn, T. J. Metrologia 2001, 38 , 289.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Jian, L.; Goessler, W.; Irgolic, K. J. Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem. 2000, 366, 48.   DOI
18 Karunasagar, D.; Arunachalam, J.; Gangadharan, S. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 1998, 13, 679.   DOI   ScienceOn