Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2017.22.2.315

Real-Time Compensation of Errors Caused by the Flux Density Non-uniformity for a Magnetically Suspended Sensitive Gyroscope  

Chaojun, Xin (Equipment Academy)
Yuanwen, Cai (Equipment Academy)
Yuan, Ren (Equipment Academy)
Yahong, Fan (Beijing Institute of Control Engineering)
Yongzhi, Su (Equipment Academy)
Publication Information
Abstract
Magnetically suspended sensitive gyroscopes (MSSGs) provide an interesting alternative for achieving precious attitude angular measurement. To effectively reduce the measurement error caused by the non-uniformity of the air-gap flux density in a MSSG, this paper proposes a novel compensation method based on measuring and modeling of the air-gap flux density. The angular velocity measurement principle and the structure of the MSSG are described, and then the characteristic of the air-gap flux density has been analyzed in detail. Next, to compensate the flux density distribution error and improve the measurement accuracy of the MSSG, a real-time compensation method based on the online measurement with hall probes is designed. The common issues caused by the non-uniformity of the air-gap flux density can be effectively resolved by the proposed method in high-precision magnetically suspended configurations. Comparative simulation results before and after compensation have verified the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed compensation method.
Keywords
Magnetically suspended sensitive gyroscope (MSSG); attitude angular measurement; non-uniformity; air-gap flux density; error compensation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 A. Johan, O. Jim, and H. Magnus, IEEE Trans. Magn. 50, 1 (2014).
2 B. Xiang and J. Q. Tang, Mechatronics 28, 46 (2015).   DOI
3 B. C. Han, S. Q. Zheng, Z. Wang, and Y. Le, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62, 7424 (2015).   DOI
4 P. L. Cui, J. Cui, Q. Yang, and S. Q. Zheng, Math. Probl. Eng. 2015, 1 (2015).
5 Y. Maruyama, T. Mizuno, M. Takasaki, Y. Ishino, and H. Kameno, J. Mechatronics 19, 1261 (2009).   DOI
6 P. L. Cui, S. Li, and C. Peng, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 21, 618 (2016).
7 Y. Ren and J. C. Fang, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 61, 1539 (2014).   DOI
8 J. C. Fang, Y. Ren, and Y. H. Fan, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 61, 2003 (2014).   DOI
9 Y. Maruyama, T. Mizuno, M. Takasaki, Y. Ishino, H. Kameno, and A. Kubo, J. Sys. Design Dyna. 3, 954 (2009).   DOI
10 T. Akiyama, T. Mizuno, M. Takasaki, Y. Ishino, and K. Obara, Mechatronics 24, 1059 (2014).   DOI
11 C. J. Xin, Y. W. Cai, Y. Ren, and Y. H. Fan, J. Magn. 21, 356 (2016).   DOI
12 S. Park and C. Lee, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 10, 618 (2006).
13 R. G. Thomas and F. L. Alan, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 29, 74 (2009).   DOI
14 T. M. Lim and D. S. Zhang, Mechatronics 18, 35 (2008).   DOI
15 T. M. Lim and D. S. Zhang, Artif. Organs 30, 347 (2006).   DOI
16 J. Q. Tang, B. Xiang, and C. E. Wang, ISA Trans. 58, 509 (2015).   DOI
17 C. E. Wang and J. Q. Tang, Math. Probl. Eng. 2013, 147 (2013).
18 L. S. Stephens and D. G. Kim, IEEE Trans. Magn. 38, 1764 (2002).   DOI