Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2015.20.2.193

Shape Optimization to Minimize The Response Time of Direct-acting Solenoid Valve  

Shin, Yujeong (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University)
Lee, Seunghwan (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan)
Choi, Changhwan (Gyeongbuk Institute for Advancement of Eco-friendly Auto Part Technology)
Kim, Jinho (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University)
Publication Information
Abstract
Direct-acting solenoid valves are used in the automotive industry due to their simple structure and quick response in controlling the flow of fluid. We performed an optimization study of response time in order to improve the dynamic performance of a direct-acting solenoid valve. For the optimal design process, we used the commercial optimization software PIAnO, which provides various tools for efficient optimization including design of experiments (DOE), approximation techniques, and a design optimization algorithm. 35 sampling points of computational experiments are performed to find the optimum values of the design variables. In all cases, ANSYS Maxwell electromagnetic analysis software was used to model the electromagnetic dynamics. An approximate model generated from the electromagnetic analysis was estimated and used for the optimization. The best optimization model was selected using the verified approximation model called the Kriging model, and an optimization algorithm called the progressive quadratic response surface method (PQRSM).
Keywords
solenoid valve; shape optimization; response time; design of experiments;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 P. W. Park, KSAE. 20, 11 (1998).
2 C. W. Park, H. S. Kim, S. J. Woo, and Y. R. Kim, KSME. 36, 335, (2012).
3 Aditya Mulemane, J. S. Han, P. H. Lu, S. J. Yoon, and M. C. Lai, KIMM. doi:10.4271/2004-01-0536 (2004).   DOI
4 Ryan R. Chladny, Charles Robert Koch, and Alan F. Lynch., IEEE Trans. Magn. 41, 1155 (2005).   DOI   ScienceOn
5 G. Tao, H. Y. Chen, Y. Y. J., and Z. B. He, J. of Materials Processing Technology 129, 555 (2002).   DOI   ScienceOn
6 L. C. Passarini and P. R. Nakajima, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. & Eng. 25, 329 (2003).   DOI
7 Q. Wang, Fengyu Yang, Q. Yang, Junhui Chen, and Hongyan Guan, Energy Conversion and Management 52, 2309 (2011).   DOI   ScienceOn
8 M. Taghizadeh, A. Ghaffari, and F. Najafi, Comptes Rendus Mecanique, 337, 131 (2009).   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Song June, Huang Jian-ping, Li Xiao-lu, Li Shu-ze, and Huang Zhen, Vehicle Engine 48 (2005).
10 Qianfeng Liu., Hanliang Bo, and Benke Qin, Nuclear Engineering and Design. 240, 2890 (2010).   DOI   ScienceOn
11 J. H. Kim, Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering 25, 53 (2008).
12 C. C. Hwang and Y. H. Cho, IEEE Trans. Magn. 37, 3021 (2001).   DOI   ScienceOn
13 S. J. Lee, J. H. Kim, B. S. Song, and J. H. Kim, J. Magn. 18, 481 (2013).   DOI   ScienceOn
14 J. H. Choi, T. H. Kim, K. B. Jang, and J. Lee, IEEE Trans. Magn. 39, 3241 (2003).   DOI   ScienceOn
15 C. H. Park, H. J. Shim, D. H. Choi, J. K. Kim, and S. M. Lee, KSAE Conference 2264 (2009).
16 K. B. Lee, C. H. Park, and J. H. Kim, Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Article ID 545126 (2014).