Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2014.19.2.181

Effects of Motor Imagery Practice in Conjunction with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Stroke Patients  

Ji, Sang-Goo (Department of Physical Therapy, Eulji University Hospital)
Cha, Hyun-Gyu (Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungbuk College)
Kim, Ki-Jong (Department of Physical Therapy, Dong-shin University)
Kim, Myoung-Kwon (Department of Physical Therapy, Young-San University)
Publication Information
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to examine whether motor imagery (MI) practice in conjunction with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to stroke patients could improve theirgait ability. This study was conducted with 29 subjects diagnosed with hemiparesis due to stroke.The experimental group consisted of 15 members who were performed MI practice in conjunction with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, while the control group consisted of 14 members who were performed MI practice and sham therapy. Both groups received traditional physical therapy for 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week, for 6 weeks; additionally, they received mental practice for 15 minutes. The experimental group was instructed to perform rTMS and the control group was instructed to apply sham stimulation for 15 minutes. Gait analysis was performed using a three-dimensional motion capture system, which is a real-time tracking device that delivers data via infrared reflective markers using six cameras. Results showed that the velocity, step length, and cadence of both groups were significantly improved after the practice (p<0.05). Significant differences were found between the groups in velocity and cadence (p<0.05) as well as with respect to the change rate (p<0.05) after practice. The results showed that MI practice in conjunction with rTMS is more effective in improving gait ability than MI practice alone.
Keywords
motor imagery; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; stroke;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 D. Burke, R. Hicks, S. C. Gandevia, J. Stephen, I. Woodforth, and M. Crawford, J. Physiol. 470, 383 (1993).   DOI
2 M. S. Boschker, F. C. Bakker, and M. B. Rietberg, J. Sports Sci. 18, 593 (2000).   DOI
3 S. M. Kosslyn, G. Ganis, and W. L. Thompson, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 635 (2001).   DOI   ScienceOn
4 R. N. Lemon, R. S. Johansson, and G. Westling, J. Neurosci 15, 6145 (1995).
5 T. Drew, J. Neurophysiol. 70, 179 (1993).   DOI
6 A. Pascual-Leone, J. M. Tormos, J. Keenan, F. Tarazona, C. Canete, and M. D. Catala, J. Clin. Nerophysiol. 15, 333 (1998).   DOI   ScienceOn
7 G. Pennisi, G. Alagona, G. Rapisarda, F. Nicoletti, E. Costanzo, R. Ferri, M. Malaquarnera, and R. Bella, Clin. Neurophysiol. 113, 1536 (2002).   DOI   ScienceOn
8 E. M. Khedr, H. M. Farweez, and H. Islam, Eur. J. 10, 567 (2003).
9 Y. R. Yang, C. Y. Tseng, S. Y. Chiou, K. K. Liao, S. J. Cheng, K. L. Lai, and R. Y. Wang, Neurorehabil. 27, 79 (2013).
10 S. J. Olney and C. L. Richards, Gait Posture 4,136 (1996).   DOI   ScienceOn
11 P. M. Davies, Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag, 235 (2000).
12 R. Dickstein, A. Dunsky, and E. Marcovitz, Phys. Ther. 84, 1167 (2004).
13 F. Malouin, C. L. Richards, and S. Belleville, 14th Inter Cong World Confed Phys. Ther. June 7 (2003).