Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2014.19.2.151

Planar Hall Resistance Sensor for Monitoring Current  

Kim, KunWoo (Department of Physics, Andong National University)
Torati, Sri Ramulu (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Chungnam National University)
Reddy, Venu (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Chungnam National University)
Yoon, SeokSoo (Department of Physics, Andong National University)
Publication Information
Abstract
Recent years have seen an increasing range of planar Hall resistive (PHR) sensor applications in the field of magnetic sensing. This study describes a new application of the PHR sensor to monitor a current. Initially, thermal drift experiments of the PHR sensor are performed, to determine the accuracy of the PHR signal output. The results of the thermal drift experiments show that there is no considerable drift in the signals attained from 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 2 mA current. Consequently, the PHR sensor provides adequate accuracy of the signal output, to perform the current monitoring experiments. The performances of the PHR sensor with bilayer and trilayer structures are then tested. The minimum detectable currents of the PHR sensor using bilayer and trilayer structures are $0.51{\mu}A$ and 54 nA, respectively. Therefore, the PHR sensor having trilayer structure is the better choice to detect ultra low current of few tens nanoampere.
Keywords
current sensor; Planar Hall Resistance (PHR); bilayer structure; trilayer stucture;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 B. Sinha, T. S. Ramulu, K. W. Kim, R. Venu, J. J. Lee, and C. G. Kim, Biosens. Bioelectron. DOI No: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.03.021 (2014).   DOI   ScienceOn
2 A. R., C. Reig, M. D. Cubells-Beltran, J. B. Roldan, D. Ramirez, S. Cardoso, and P. P. Freitas, Solid State Electron. 54, 1606 (2010).   DOI   ScienceOn
3 S. Oh, M. Jadhav, J. Lim, V. Reddy, and C. G. Kim, Biosens. Bioelectron. 41, 758 (2013).   DOI   ScienceOn
4 B. Sinha, T. Q. Hung, T. S. Ramulu, S. Oh, and K. Kim, J. Appl. Phys. 113, 063903 (2013).   DOI   ScienceOn
5 H. Kim, V. Reddy, K. W. Kim, I. Jeong, X. H. Hu, and C. G. Kim, J. Magn. 19, 1 (2014).   DOI   ScienceOn
6 J. A. Ferreira, W. A. Cronje, and W. A. Relihan, IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 10, 32 (1995).   DOI   ScienceOn
7 M. Shafiq, G. A. Hussain, L. Kutt, and M. Lehtonen, Measurement 49, 126 (2014).   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Z. P. Wang, Q. B. Li, Y. Qi, Z. J. Huang, and J. H. Shi, Opt. Laser. Technol. 38, 87 (2006).   DOI   ScienceOn
9 M. Banjevic, B. Furrer, M. Blagojevic, and R. S. Popovic, Sensor Actuat. A-Phys. 178, 64 (2012).   DOI   ScienceOn
10 S. J. Petricevic, Z. Stojkovic, and J. B. Radunovic, IEEE Instrum. Meas. 55, 923 (2006).   DOI   ScienceOn
11 R. S. Popovic, Z. Randjelovic, and D. Manic, Sensor Actuat. A-Phys. 91, 46 (2001).   DOI   ScienceOn
12 S. H. Cheng and S. F. Lin, Sensor Actuat. A-Phys. 193, 112 (2013).   DOI   ScienceOn
13 P. Mlejnek, M. Vopalensky, and P. Ripka, Sensor Actuat. A-Phys. 141, 649 (2008).   DOI   ScienceOn
14 S. Ziegler, R. C. Woodward, H. H. Iu, and Lawrence J. Borle, IEEE Sens. J. 9, 354 (2009).   DOI   ScienceOn
15 J. Zubia, L. Casado, G. Aldabaldetreku, A. Montero, E. Zubia, and G. Durana, Sensors 13, 13584 (2013).   DOI